教科书技术呈现与可读性:马来西亚四本阿拉伯语教科书的KBD分析

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290
Mohd Fadzli Ismail, N.M.K. Nik Yusoff
{"title":"教科书技术呈现与可读性:马来西亚四本阿拉伯语教科书的KBD分析","authors":"Mohd Fadzli Ismail, N.M.K. Nik Yusoff","doi":"10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Efforts to improve the teaching of the Arabic language as a subject have the potential to strengthen the Integrated Dini Curriculum (KBD) in Malaysia. Thus, it is appropriate and necessary to examine the relevance of textbook technical presentation in terms of text readability. Therefore, this study aims to identify the relationship between the technical presentation of the Arabic textbook (al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah) in the Form Four Integrated Dini Curriculum in Government-Aided Religious Schools (SABK) and the readability of textbooks. \n  \nMethodology: This study was designed as survey research. 694 respondents Form Four SABK were recruited in this study, selected using a proportionate stratified random sampling method. The questionnaire items were administrated to the respondents after they were tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. This included frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation tests. \n  \nFindings: Results showed that the technical presentation of KBD Form Four Arabic textbooks is of a high level. However, the readability of the textbook overall was unsatisfactory. It was also shown that there was a weak significant positive relationship between the textbook technical presentation and the readability of Arabic textbooks for SABK students. \n  \nContributions: The findings of this study have implications on textbook writers to improve textbook readability, especially for language learners. The findings also may contribute to the Ministry of education, course designers, as well school administrators to be vigilant before making any decisions on textbooks used for educational purposes. \n  \nKeywords: al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah, government-aided religious school students, Integrated Dini Curriculum, readability, textbook technical presentation. \n  \nCite as: Ismail, M. F., & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R. (2022). Textbook technical presentation vs. Readability: An analysis of KBD form four Arabic textbooks in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 270-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290","PeriodicalId":16687,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TEXTBOOK TECHNICAL PRESENTATION VS. READABILITY: AN ANALYSIS OF KBD FORM FOUR ARABIC TEXTBOOKS IN MALAYSIA\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Fadzli Ismail, N.M.K. Nik Yusoff\",\"doi\":\"10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Purpose: Efforts to improve the teaching of the Arabic language as a subject have the potential to strengthen the Integrated Dini Curriculum (KBD) in Malaysia. Thus, it is appropriate and necessary to examine the relevance of textbook technical presentation in terms of text readability. Therefore, this study aims to identify the relationship between the technical presentation of the Arabic textbook (al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah) in the Form Four Integrated Dini Curriculum in Government-Aided Religious Schools (SABK) and the readability of textbooks. \\n  \\nMethodology: This study was designed as survey research. 694 respondents Form Four SABK were recruited in this study, selected using a proportionate stratified random sampling method. The questionnaire items were administrated to the respondents after they were tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. This included frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation tests. \\n  \\nFindings: Results showed that the technical presentation of KBD Form Four Arabic textbooks is of a high level. However, the readability of the textbook overall was unsatisfactory. It was also shown that there was a weak significant positive relationship between the textbook technical presentation and the readability of Arabic textbooks for SABK students. \\n  \\nContributions: The findings of this study have implications on textbook writers to improve textbook readability, especially for language learners. The findings also may contribute to the Ministry of education, course designers, as well school administrators to be vigilant before making any decisions on textbooks used for educational purposes. \\n  \\nKeywords: al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah, government-aided religious school students, Integrated Dini Curriculum, readability, textbook technical presentation. \\n  \\nCite as: Ismail, M. F., & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R. (2022). Textbook technical presentation vs. Readability: An analysis of KBD form four Arabic textbooks in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 270-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290\",\"PeriodicalId\":16687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:努力改善阿拉伯语作为一门学科的教学,有可能加强马来西亚的综合迪尼课程(KBD)。因此,从文本可读性的角度来考察教科书技术表现的相关性是适当和必要的。因此,本研究旨在确定政府资助宗教学校(SABK)中四年级综合Dini课程中阿拉伯语教科书(al- lughah al- ' Arabiyyah al- mu ' asirah)的技术呈现与教科书的可读性之间的关系。方法:本研究采用问卷调查法。本研究采用比例分层随机抽样方法,共招募了694名调查对象。问卷内容经过效度和信度检验后发放给被调查者。对数据进行描述性和推理性分析。这包括频率、百分比、平均值、标准差和Pearson相关检验。结果:结果表明,大学部中四阿拉伯语教材的技术呈现水平较高。然而,教科书的可读性总体上并不令人满意。教科书技术呈现与SABK学生的阿拉伯语教科书可读性之间存在微弱的显著正相关。贡献:本研究结果对教科书编写者提高教科书可读性,尤其是对语言学习者而言,具有启示意义。这一发现也可能有助于教育部、课程设计者以及学校管理者在决定是否使用用于教育目的的教科书之前保持警惕。关键词:al- lughah al- ' Arabiyyah al- mu ' asirah,政府资助的宗教学校学生,综合Dini课程,可读性,教科书技术呈现引自:Ismail, M. F, & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R.(2022)。教科书技术呈现与可读性:马来西亚四本阿拉伯语教科书的KBD分析。自然科学学报,7(2),270-290。http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TEXTBOOK TECHNICAL PRESENTATION VS. READABILITY: AN ANALYSIS OF KBD FORM FOUR ARABIC TEXTBOOKS IN MALAYSIA
Background and Purpose: Efforts to improve the teaching of the Arabic language as a subject have the potential to strengthen the Integrated Dini Curriculum (KBD) in Malaysia. Thus, it is appropriate and necessary to examine the relevance of textbook technical presentation in terms of text readability. Therefore, this study aims to identify the relationship between the technical presentation of the Arabic textbook (al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah) in the Form Four Integrated Dini Curriculum in Government-Aided Religious Schools (SABK) and the readability of textbooks.   Methodology: This study was designed as survey research. 694 respondents Form Four SABK were recruited in this study, selected using a proportionate stratified random sampling method. The questionnaire items were administrated to the respondents after they were tested for validity and reliability. Data were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. This included frequency, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation tests.   Findings: Results showed that the technical presentation of KBD Form Four Arabic textbooks is of a high level. However, the readability of the textbook overall was unsatisfactory. It was also shown that there was a weak significant positive relationship between the textbook technical presentation and the readability of Arabic textbooks for SABK students.   Contributions: The findings of this study have implications on textbook writers to improve textbook readability, especially for language learners. The findings also may contribute to the Ministry of education, course designers, as well school administrators to be vigilant before making any decisions on textbooks used for educational purposes.   Keywords: al-Lughah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mu’asirah, government-aided religious school students, Integrated Dini Curriculum, readability, textbook technical presentation.   Cite as: Ismail, M. F., & Nik Yusoff, N. M. R. (2022). Textbook technical presentation vs. Readability: An analysis of KBD form four Arabic textbooks in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 7(2), 270-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss2pp270-290
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊最新文献
“GREETINGS FROM HELL (NERAKA KIRIM SALAM)”: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS-BASED CYBERBULLYING OF DEHIJABIS IMPLEMENTING MONETARY POLICY WITH APPLICATION OF SUKUK: CHALLENGES AND POLICY DIRECTIONS CHALLENGES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN IMPLEMENTING GAMIFICATION APPROACH AMONG VOCATIONAL COLLEGE LECTURERS IN MALAYSIA THE CONSTRUCTION AND NEGOTIATION OF AGENTIVE IDENTITY: A CASE STUDY OF A MALAYSIAN STUDENT HEURISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIVE LANGUAGE CURRICULUM OF SUCCESSFUL COUNTRIES IN PISA AND TURKEY BY USING ANFIS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1