轻度或边缘性智力残疾患者抑郁症的患病率和诊断:多仪器测试告诉我们更多

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642
J. Scheirs, A. Muller, N. Manders, C. D. van der Zanden
{"title":"轻度或边缘性智力残疾患者抑郁症的患病率和诊断:多仪器测试告诉我们更多","authors":"J. Scheirs, A. Muller, N. Manders, C. D. van der Zanden","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction Estimates of the prevalence of depression in people with intellectual disability range from almost nonexistent to 39%. We analyzed the outcomes of three screening instruments to find out more about the prevalence in people with mild or borderline disability. Methods 102 Dutch individuals residing in institutions or living independently took part. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Signaallijst Depressie voor Zwakzinnigen were used. Results Using the standard cutoff values, the numbers of people identified as depressed by the tests were 31%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. These were high numbers, and they did not refer to the same cases. When scoring above cutoff on all three tests simultaneously was the criterion, 13.7% of the participants were identified as depressed. Conclusion The combined use of several measuring instruments taught us that depression in people with intellectual disabilities might occur more frequently than often assumed: 13.7% might be the lower limit of its actual prevalence. People in this group still run the risk of being underdiagnosed.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"59 1","pages":"54 - 66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Diagnosis of Depression in People with Mild or Borderline Intellectual Disability: Multiple Instrument Testing Tells Us More\",\"authors\":\"J. Scheirs, A. Muller, N. Manders, C. D. van der Zanden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Introduction Estimates of the prevalence of depression in people with intellectual disability range from almost nonexistent to 39%. We analyzed the outcomes of three screening instruments to find out more about the prevalence in people with mild or borderline disability. Methods 102 Dutch individuals residing in institutions or living independently took part. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Signaallijst Depressie voor Zwakzinnigen were used. Results Using the standard cutoff values, the numbers of people identified as depressed by the tests were 31%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. These were high numbers, and they did not refer to the same cases. When scoring above cutoff on all three tests simultaneously was the criterion, 13.7% of the participants were identified as depressed. Conclusion The combined use of several measuring instruments taught us that depression in people with intellectual disabilities might occur more frequently than often assumed: 13.7% might be the lower limit of its actual prevalence. People in this group still run the risk of being underdiagnosed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2022.2029642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对智力残疾患者中抑郁症患病率的估计从几乎不存在到39%不等。我们分析了三种筛查手段的结果,以了解更多关于轻度或边缘性残疾人群的患病率。方法对居住在机构或独立生活的102名荷兰人进行调查。采用贝克抑郁量表、格拉斯哥抑郁量表和信号分子抑郁量表。结果使用标准截断值,通过测试确定为抑郁症的人数分别为31%,44%和22%。这些数字都很高,而且它们指的不是同一种情况。当三项测试同时得分高于临界值为标准时,13.7%的参与者被确定为抑郁。结论多种测量手段的综合使用告诉我们,智力障碍患者抑郁症的发生频率可能比通常假设的要高:13.7%可能是其实际患病率的下限。这一群体的人仍然有被诊断不足的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Prevalence and Diagnosis of Depression in People with Mild or Borderline Intellectual Disability: Multiple Instrument Testing Tells Us More
ABSTRACT Introduction Estimates of the prevalence of depression in people with intellectual disability range from almost nonexistent to 39%. We analyzed the outcomes of three screening instruments to find out more about the prevalence in people with mild or borderline disability. Methods 102 Dutch individuals residing in institutions or living independently took part. The Beck Depression Inventory, the Glasgow Depression Scale and the Signaallijst Depressie voor Zwakzinnigen were used. Results Using the standard cutoff values, the numbers of people identified as depressed by the tests were 31%, 44%, and 22%, respectively. These were high numbers, and they did not refer to the same cases. When scoring above cutoff on all three tests simultaneously was the criterion, 13.7% of the participants were identified as depressed. Conclusion The combined use of several measuring instruments taught us that depression in people with intellectual disabilities might occur more frequently than often assumed: 13.7% might be the lower limit of its actual prevalence. People in this group still run the risk of being underdiagnosed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1