衡量支付意愿:一种比较估值方法

IF 11.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1177/00222429231195564
Sharlene He, Eric T. Anderson, Derek D. Rucker
{"title":"衡量支付意愿:一种比较估值方法","authors":"Sharlene He, Eric T. Anderson, Derek D. Rucker","doi":"10.1177/00222429231195564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Willingness to pay (WTP) is a metric that is widely valued and utilized among both practitioners and academics. However, the conceptualization of WTP is ambiguous, and this ambiguity is reflected across existing methods of measuring WTP. This paper first presents a formal mathematical framework that clarifies WTP as a distributional concept—rather than a single number—constructed as a function of customers, comparisons, and situations. The framework further reveals the operation of two comparative mechanisms, direct and indirect, by which situational factors affect WTP. This paper then introduces a new method to measure WTP—Comparative Method of Valuation (CMV)—that, unlike existing methods, is designed to account for the inherently comparative and situational nature of WTP. Across nine studies reported in the paper and four additional studies in the Web Appendix, the authors a) examine differences in results between CMV and choice-based conjoint as well as between CMV and the classic Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) methodology, b) demonstrate that CMV is a valid and reliable measure of WTP, and c) illustrate applications of CMV to managerial problems. In total, this paper offers both conceptual clarity and methodological advances to understanding the construction and measurement of WTP for practitioners and academics alike.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Measuring Willingness to Pay: A Comparative Method of Valuation\",\"authors\":\"Sharlene He, Eric T. Anderson, Derek D. Rucker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222429231195564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Willingness to pay (WTP) is a metric that is widely valued and utilized among both practitioners and academics. However, the conceptualization of WTP is ambiguous, and this ambiguity is reflected across existing methods of measuring WTP. This paper first presents a formal mathematical framework that clarifies WTP as a distributional concept—rather than a single number—constructed as a function of customers, comparisons, and situations. The framework further reveals the operation of two comparative mechanisms, direct and indirect, by which situational factors affect WTP. This paper then introduces a new method to measure WTP—Comparative Method of Valuation (CMV)—that, unlike existing methods, is designed to account for the inherently comparative and situational nature of WTP. Across nine studies reported in the paper and four additional studies in the Web Appendix, the authors a) examine differences in results between CMV and choice-based conjoint as well as between CMV and the classic Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) methodology, b) demonstrate that CMV is a valid and reliable measure of WTP, and c) illustrate applications of CMV to managerial problems. In total, this paper offers both conceptual clarity and methodological advances to understanding the construction and measurement of WTP for practitioners and academics alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231195564\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429231195564","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

支付意愿(WTP)是一个在从业者和学者中被广泛重视和使用的度量标准。然而,WTP的概念是模糊的,这种模糊反映在现有的测量WTP的方法中。本文首先提出了一个正式的数学框架,将WTP澄清为一个分布概念——而不是一个单一的数字——作为客户、比较和情况的函数构造。该框架进一步揭示了情境因素影响工作效率的直接和间接两种比较机制。然后,本文介绍了一种衡量WTP的新方法-比较估价法(CMV),它与现有方法不同,旨在解释WTP固有的比较和情境性质。在论文中报告的9项研究和Web附录中的另外4项研究中,作者a)检查了CMV与基于选择的联合方法之间的结果差异,以及CMV与经典的Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM)方法之间的结果差异,b)证明CMV是WTP的有效可靠测量方法,c)说明了CMV在管理问题中的应用。总的来说,本文为从业者和学者理解WTP的构建和测量提供了概念上的清晰度和方法上的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: Measuring Willingness to Pay: A Comparative Method of Valuation
Willingness to pay (WTP) is a metric that is widely valued and utilized among both practitioners and academics. However, the conceptualization of WTP is ambiguous, and this ambiguity is reflected across existing methods of measuring WTP. This paper first presents a formal mathematical framework that clarifies WTP as a distributional concept—rather than a single number—constructed as a function of customers, comparisons, and situations. The framework further reveals the operation of two comparative mechanisms, direct and indirect, by which situational factors affect WTP. This paper then introduces a new method to measure WTP—Comparative Method of Valuation (CMV)—that, unlike existing methods, is designed to account for the inherently comparative and situational nature of WTP. Across nine studies reported in the paper and four additional studies in the Web Appendix, the authors a) examine differences in results between CMV and choice-based conjoint as well as between CMV and the classic Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) methodology, b) demonstrate that CMV is a valid and reliable measure of WTP, and c) illustrate applications of CMV to managerial problems. In total, this paper offers both conceptual clarity and methodological advances to understanding the construction and measurement of WTP for practitioners and academics alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Beyond the Pair: Media Archetypes and Complex Channel Synergies in Advertising EXPRESS: Conceptual Research: Multidisciplinary Insights for Marketing EXPRESS: Racial Inequity in Donation-based Crowdfunding Platforms: the Role of Facial Emotional Expressiveness Becoming More Socially Profit Oriented EXPRESS: To Dispose or Eat? the Impact of Perceived Healthiness on Consumption Decisions for About-to-Expire Foods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1