税收法律关系冲突学:理论与方法论

V. Chaika, Larysa Chaika
{"title":"税收法律关系冲突学:理论与方法论","authors":"V. Chaika, Larysa Chaika","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose. The objective of the article is to establish the content and meaning of conflicts that arise and cease in the field of tax relations. Methods. The evolution of scientific conflict concepts is due to the interdisciplinary approach: emphasis is placed on the impossibility of separating philosophical, social, psycholinguistic and legal aspects of the conflict. Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the “conflict” category was carried out using an integrative approach. Results. Modern approaches to the conflict as an object of scientific analysis are differentiated into two main groups: 1) the conflict is considered in a narrow field sense; 2) the conflict is studied from interdisciplinary positions. The legal nature and attributive properties of the tax conflict are clarified from the standpoint of the tax law theory. There are five groups of factors that confirm the actual existence of conflicting tax relationships. A special attention was paid to the characteristics of the tax dispute (as one of the stages of the tax conflict) and ways to protect the rights of taxpayers. In particular, the issue of self-protection of taxpayers’ rights as a guarantee of the realization of subjective rights and legitimate interests in tax relations and as a basis for preventing tax conflicts and tax disputes was highlighted. Conclusions. It is proved that the basis of any conflict is a contradiction, which plays a systemic role both for certain types of conflict and for different levels of their research. However, the presence of contradictions forms only the preconditions of possible behaviour, while interpersonal relationships – as a social category – play a crucial role in the choice of an individual strategy in communicative interaction. It was substantiated that the tax dispute is a mechanism to guarantee the realization of subjective rights of stakeholders and the balance of public and private interests in the field of taxation, given the following factors: 1) focus on protection and restoration of violated (disputed) rights, further; 2) focus on resolving the tax conflict that has arisen over the exercise of rights and obligations; 3) focus on ensuring stability of conditions to implement the legal norm and optimization of legal regulation; 4) considering the dispute by the state power authorized body ensures stability of the legal system of a society. It is determined that a tax dispute is a tax conflict of the tax relations subjects, submitted for consideration to the authorized jurisdiction body, concerning their mutual rights and obligations, as well as the conditions of their implementation, and which requires a solution based on a legal assessment of the facts and verification of the legality of the government entity’s actions in relation to the taxpayer.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONFLICTOLOGY OF TAX LEGAL RELATIONS: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT\",\"authors\":\"V. Chaika, Larysa Chaika\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose. The objective of the article is to establish the content and meaning of conflicts that arise and cease in the field of tax relations. Methods. The evolution of scientific conflict concepts is due to the interdisciplinary approach: emphasis is placed on the impossibility of separating philosophical, social, psycholinguistic and legal aspects of the conflict. Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the “conflict” category was carried out using an integrative approach. Results. Modern approaches to the conflict as an object of scientific analysis are differentiated into two main groups: 1) the conflict is considered in a narrow field sense; 2) the conflict is studied from interdisciplinary positions. The legal nature and attributive properties of the tax conflict are clarified from the standpoint of the tax law theory. There are five groups of factors that confirm the actual existence of conflicting tax relationships. A special attention was paid to the characteristics of the tax dispute (as one of the stages of the tax conflict) and ways to protect the rights of taxpayers. In particular, the issue of self-protection of taxpayers’ rights as a guarantee of the realization of subjective rights and legitimate interests in tax relations and as a basis for preventing tax conflicts and tax disputes was highlighted. Conclusions. It is proved that the basis of any conflict is a contradiction, which plays a systemic role both for certain types of conflict and for different levels of their research. However, the presence of contradictions forms only the preconditions of possible behaviour, while interpersonal relationships – as a social category – play a crucial role in the choice of an individual strategy in communicative interaction. It was substantiated that the tax dispute is a mechanism to guarantee the realization of subjective rights of stakeholders and the balance of public and private interests in the field of taxation, given the following factors: 1) focus on protection and restoration of violated (disputed) rights, further; 2) focus on resolving the tax conflict that has arisen over the exercise of rights and obligations; 3) focus on ensuring stability of conditions to implement the legal norm and optimization of legal regulation; 4) considering the dispute by the state power authorized body ensures stability of the legal system of a society. It is determined that a tax dispute is a tax conflict of the tax relations subjects, submitted for consideration to the authorized jurisdiction body, concerning their mutual rights and obligations, as well as the conditions of their implementation, and which requires a solution based on a legal assessment of the facts and verification of the legality of the government entity’s actions in relation to the taxpayer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative law and process\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative law and process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。本文的目的是确立税收关系领域中产生和终止冲突的内容和意义。方法。科学冲突概念的演变是由于跨学科的方法:强调不可能将冲突的哲学、社会、心理语言和法律方面分开。采用综合方法对“冲突”类别进行了全面和系统的分析。结果。将冲突作为科学分析对象的现代方法主要分为两大类:1)在狭隘的领域意义上考虑冲突;2)从跨学科的角度来研究冲突。从税法理论的角度厘清了税收冲突的法律性质和属性。有五组因素可以证实税收冲突关系的实际存在。特别关注了税收纠纷(作为税收冲突的一个阶段)的特点和保护纳税人权利的途径。特别强调了纳税人权利的自我保护问题,这是实现税收关系中主观权利和合法利益的保障,也是防止税收冲突和税收纠纷的基础。结论。事实证明,任何冲突的基础都是矛盾,无论是对某些类型的冲突还是对其不同层次的研究,矛盾都起着系统的作用。然而,矛盾的存在只是可能行为的前提条件,而人际关系作为一个社会范畴,在交际互动中对个体策略的选择起着至关重要的作用。税收纠纷是一种保障税收领域利益相关者主观权利实现和公私利益平衡的机制,主要体现在以下几个方面:1)注重对被侵犯(争议)权利的保护和恢复;2)着力解决权利义务行使过程中产生的税收冲突;3)注重保障法律规范实施条件的稳定性和法律规制的优化;4)由国家权力授权机构考虑纠纷,确保社会法律制度的稳定。税收纠纷被确定为税收关系主体之间的税收冲突,提交给授权管辖机构审议,涉及他们的相互权利和义务,以及他们的实施条件,需要在对事实的法律评估和对政府实体对纳税人行为的合法性的验证的基础上解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CONFLICTOLOGY OF TAX LEGAL RELATIONS: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT
Purpose. The objective of the article is to establish the content and meaning of conflicts that arise and cease in the field of tax relations. Methods. The evolution of scientific conflict concepts is due to the interdisciplinary approach: emphasis is placed on the impossibility of separating philosophical, social, psycholinguistic and legal aspects of the conflict. Comprehensive and systematic analysis of the “conflict” category was carried out using an integrative approach. Results. Modern approaches to the conflict as an object of scientific analysis are differentiated into two main groups: 1) the conflict is considered in a narrow field sense; 2) the conflict is studied from interdisciplinary positions. The legal nature and attributive properties of the tax conflict are clarified from the standpoint of the tax law theory. There are five groups of factors that confirm the actual existence of conflicting tax relationships. A special attention was paid to the characteristics of the tax dispute (as one of the stages of the tax conflict) and ways to protect the rights of taxpayers. In particular, the issue of self-protection of taxpayers’ rights as a guarantee of the realization of subjective rights and legitimate interests in tax relations and as a basis for preventing tax conflicts and tax disputes was highlighted. Conclusions. It is proved that the basis of any conflict is a contradiction, which plays a systemic role both for certain types of conflict and for different levels of their research. However, the presence of contradictions forms only the preconditions of possible behaviour, while interpersonal relationships – as a social category – play a crucial role in the choice of an individual strategy in communicative interaction. It was substantiated that the tax dispute is a mechanism to guarantee the realization of subjective rights of stakeholders and the balance of public and private interests in the field of taxation, given the following factors: 1) focus on protection and restoration of violated (disputed) rights, further; 2) focus on resolving the tax conflict that has arisen over the exercise of rights and obligations; 3) focus on ensuring stability of conditions to implement the legal norm and optimization of legal regulation; 4) considering the dispute by the state power authorized body ensures stability of the legal system of a society. It is determined that a tax dispute is a tax conflict of the tax relations subjects, submitted for consideration to the authorized jurisdiction body, concerning their mutual rights and obligations, as well as the conditions of their implementation, and which requires a solution based on a legal assessment of the facts and verification of the legality of the government entity’s actions in relation to the taxpayer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOME ISSUES OF INSTANCE JURISDICTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUNCTIONING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS UNDER MARITAL LAW THE LEGAL ESSENCE OF THE ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE: A BRIEF COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS PECULIARITIES OF DETERMINING THE LEGAL STATUS OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENSE COUNCIL OF UKRAINE AS A SUBJECT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THE LAW ON FOOD SECURITY OF UKRAINE AS A LEGAL BASIS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE FIELD OF ENSURING FOOD SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1