北约武装干预南斯拉夫联邦共和国的国际法教训

IF 1.6 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS International Spectator Pub Date : 1999-07-01 DOI:10.1080/03932729908456875
N. Ronzitti
{"title":"北约武装干预南斯拉夫联邦共和国的国际法教训","authors":"N. Ronzitti","doi":"10.1080/03932729908456875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the UN Charter, the threat and use of force is prohibited by Article 2.4, which most writers consider a peremptory norm of international law. The use of force by individual states (acting alone or in a military alliance) is permitted only in self-defence under article 51 or against “enemy states”, according to Articles 107 and 53 (the action may be taken by individual states or by a regional organisation). The practice shows that states are lawfully permitted to resort to force, if they are authorised by the UN Security Council (SC), acting under Chapter VII, that is, if the SC determines that there is a threat to peace or a breach of peace or that an act of aggression have taken place. This point is no longer object of controversy, even though writers are questioning whether this permissive rule is the consequence of a custom within the Charter or can simply be derived from Article 48, which states that actions required to carry out decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all UN members “or by some of them”. 1","PeriodicalId":46246,"journal":{"name":"International Spectator","volume":"16 1","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons of international law from NATO's armed intervention against the federal republic of Yugoslavia\",\"authors\":\"N. Ronzitti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03932729908456875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under the UN Charter, the threat and use of force is prohibited by Article 2.4, which most writers consider a peremptory norm of international law. The use of force by individual states (acting alone or in a military alliance) is permitted only in self-defence under article 51 or against “enemy states”, according to Articles 107 and 53 (the action may be taken by individual states or by a regional organisation). The practice shows that states are lawfully permitted to resort to force, if they are authorised by the UN Security Council (SC), acting under Chapter VII, that is, if the SC determines that there is a threat to peace or a breach of peace or that an act of aggression have taken place. This point is no longer object of controversy, even though writers are questioning whether this permissive rule is the consequence of a custom within the Charter or can simply be derived from Article 48, which states that actions required to carry out decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all UN members “or by some of them”. 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":46246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Spectator\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"45-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Spectator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729908456875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Spectator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729908456875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

根据《联合国宪章》,第2.4条禁止以武力相威胁和使用武力,大多数作者认为这是国际法的强制性规范。根据第51条的规定,只有在自卫的情况下,或者在第107条和第53条的规定下,针对“敌国”的情况下,个别国家(单独行动或军事同盟行动)才被允许使用武力(这种行动可以由个别国家或地区组织采取)。实践表明,如果各国得到联合国安理会授权,根据第七章行事,也就是说,如果安理会确定存在对和平的威胁或破坏和平或侵略行为已经发生,那么各国就可以合法地使用武力。这一点已不再是争论的对象,尽管作者们正在质疑这一允许规则是《宪章》内的一种习惯的结果,还是可以简单地从第48条推导出来,该条规定,为执行安理会维持国际和平与安全的决定所需要的行动,应由所有联合国会员国“或其中一些会员国”采取。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons of international law from NATO's armed intervention against the federal republic of Yugoslavia
Under the UN Charter, the threat and use of force is prohibited by Article 2.4, which most writers consider a peremptory norm of international law. The use of force by individual states (acting alone or in a military alliance) is permitted only in self-defence under article 51 or against “enemy states”, according to Articles 107 and 53 (the action may be taken by individual states or by a regional organisation). The practice shows that states are lawfully permitted to resort to force, if they are authorised by the UN Security Council (SC), acting under Chapter VII, that is, if the SC determines that there is a threat to peace or a breach of peace or that an act of aggression have taken place. This point is no longer object of controversy, even though writers are questioning whether this permissive rule is the consequence of a custom within the Charter or can simply be derived from Article 48, which states that actions required to carry out decisions of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security shall be taken by all UN members “or by some of them”. 1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Spectator
International Spectator INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Weathering the Geopolitical Storms: The Ever-elusive Success of EU Policy towards Iran Opposing Nuclear Weapons Testing in the Global South: A Comparative Perspective Oops! … EU Did It Again! The EU’s Preference for Global Treaties vis-a-vis the Reality of WHO Politics The Falklands/Malvinas as an Identity Dispute: A Constructivist Analysis of the British and Argentinian Positions Kuwait as a Mediator in Regional Affairs: The Gulf Crises of 2014 and 2017
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1