cordoba中所谓的圣文森特大教堂:从历史神话到历史固执

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY AL-QANTARA Pub Date : 2015-06-30 DOI:10.3989/ALQANTARA.2015.001
Fernando Arce-Sainz
{"title":"cordoba中所谓的圣文森特大教堂:从历史神话到历史固执","authors":"Fernando Arce-Sainz","doi":"10.3989/ALQANTARA.2015.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Underneath the Great-Mosque of Cordoba, there are some archaeological remains which have been the origin of several historiographical debates. The core of these debates was the idea that there were previous Christian buildings in the site later demolished to make room for the Umayyad mosque. However, the documented church of Saint Vincent, for the astonishment of many, did not appear in the excavations made in the 1930s. Much later, set aside the myth, but never truly forgotten, the idea that there might have been a full episcopal complex suceeded the other. Recent historigraphical developments are building new interpretations upon an archaeological evidence, that drove archaeologists, in the past, to deny definitively the presence of these ecclesiastical premises. This article argues what others have already stated: that according to the present archaeological knowledge, no evidence shows that there were previous Christian buildings under the Umayyad mosque. In terms of our conclusions, the article is not original. The main aim of this contribution is to offer a new and neccesary contextualizacion of textual and archaeological interpretations of emphirical data.","PeriodicalId":44299,"journal":{"name":"AL-QANTARA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La supuesta basílica de San Vicente en Córdoba: de mito histórico a obstinación historiográfica\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Arce-Sainz\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/ALQANTARA.2015.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Underneath the Great-Mosque of Cordoba, there are some archaeological remains which have been the origin of several historiographical debates. The core of these debates was the idea that there were previous Christian buildings in the site later demolished to make room for the Umayyad mosque. However, the documented church of Saint Vincent, for the astonishment of many, did not appear in the excavations made in the 1930s. Much later, set aside the myth, but never truly forgotten, the idea that there might have been a full episcopal complex suceeded the other. Recent historigraphical developments are building new interpretations upon an archaeological evidence, that drove archaeologists, in the past, to deny definitively the presence of these ecclesiastical premises. This article argues what others have already stated: that according to the present archaeological knowledge, no evidence shows that there were previous Christian buildings under the Umayyad mosque. In terms of our conclusions, the article is not original. The main aim of this contribution is to offer a new and neccesary contextualizacion of textual and archaeological interpretations of emphirical data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AL-QANTARA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AL-QANTARA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/ALQANTARA.2015.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-QANTARA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ALQANTARA.2015.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在科尔多瓦大清真寺的下面,有一些考古遗迹,它们一直是几次史学辩论的起源。这些争论的核心是这个地方以前有基督教建筑,后来被拆除,为倭马亚清真寺腾出空间。然而,令许多人惊讶的是,记录在案的圣文森特教堂并没有出现在20世纪30年代的挖掘中。很久以后,抛开神话,但从未真正忘记,可能有一个完整的主教综合体接替了另一个。最近的史学发展在考古证据的基础上建立了新的解释,这促使考古学家在过去明确否认这些教会场所的存在。这篇文章论证了其他人已经说过的:根据目前的考古知识,没有证据表明在倭马亚清真寺下面有以前的基督教建筑。就我们的结论而言,这篇文章不是原创的。这一贡献的主要目的是提供一个新的和必要的文本和考古解释经验数据的语境化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La supuesta basílica de San Vicente en Córdoba: de mito histórico a obstinación historiográfica
Underneath the Great-Mosque of Cordoba, there are some archaeological remains which have been the origin of several historiographical debates. The core of these debates was the idea that there were previous Christian buildings in the site later demolished to make room for the Umayyad mosque. However, the documented church of Saint Vincent, for the astonishment of many, did not appear in the excavations made in the 1930s. Much later, set aside the myth, but never truly forgotten, the idea that there might have been a full episcopal complex suceeded the other. Recent historigraphical developments are building new interpretations upon an archaeological evidence, that drove archaeologists, in the past, to deny definitively the presence of these ecclesiastical premises. This article argues what others have already stated: that according to the present archaeological knowledge, no evidence shows that there were previous Christian buildings under the Umayyad mosque. In terms of our conclusions, the article is not original. The main aim of this contribution is to offer a new and neccesary contextualizacion of textual and archaeological interpretations of emphirical data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AL-QANTARA
AL-QANTARA Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Al-Qanṭara inició su publicación en 1980, como continuación de Al-Andalus (1933-1978). Al-Qanṭara está dedicada a la civilización del Islam clásico (hasta el siglo XVII incluido) con especial atención al Occidente islámico. Se publica en forma de dos fascículos anuales de unas 250 páginas cada uno. Una sección monográfica aparece en el segundo fascículo de cada año. La revista sólo solicita contribuciones para las secciones monográficas.
期刊最新文献
Cómo aprendió árabe Campomanes: sobre el aprendizaje de lenguas orientales en la Ilustración española La guerra y la esclavización de los moriscos de las Alpujarras (enero a abril de 1569): el reino de Granada como mercado coyuntural de esclavos La versión simple del instrumento al-sarrāŷiyya: comentarios textuales y técnicos Pintura califal de Bédar (Almería, 355/966) Entre musalsal et silsila, une frontière ténue: Le cas de la muṣāfaḥa et de la mushābaka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1