槲皮素、抗坏血酸、咖啡因和鞣花酸比罗格列酮、二甲双胍和格列美脲更有效地干扰导致糖尿病相关神经系统并发症发展的途径:一项体外比较研究

Vineet Mehta , Parul Verma , Neelam Sharma , Arun Sharma , Aman Thakur , Udayabanu Malairaman
{"title":"槲皮素、抗坏血酸、咖啡因和鞣花酸比罗格列酮、二甲双胍和格列美脲更有效地干扰导致糖尿病相关神经系统并发症发展的途径:一项体外比较研究","authors":"Vineet Mehta ,&nbsp;Parul Verma ,&nbsp;Neelam Sharma ,&nbsp;Arun Sharma ,&nbsp;Aman Thakur ,&nbsp;Udayabanu Malairaman","doi":"10.1016/j.bfopcu.2016.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neuropathy is the least understood and most devastating complication associated with diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy develops in patients despite of regular therapy, indicating that marketed drugs has minimal effect on pathways leading to the development and progression of these complications. Present study was aimed to evaluate natural compounds for their ability to interfere with pathways leading to the development of diabetes mediated neurological complications and compare their efficacy with marketed anti-diabetic drugs. Anti-diabetic potential of ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, ellagic acid, cinnamic acid, caffeine and piperine was predicted by evaluating <em>in-silico</em> interaction energy (kcal/mol) of these compounds with insulin receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-γ and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 proteins. Ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin and ellagic acid showed excellent <em>in-vitro</em> antioxidant activity in DPPH radical scavenging and inhibition of lipid peroxidation assay, which was 1.5–3 folds better than the marketed drugs. Quercetin, gallic acid, cinnamic acid, piperine and caffeine efficiently prevented H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> induced genotoxicity, which commercial drugs failed to prevent. Further, quercetin, ellagic acid, caffeine and ascorbic acid were 3–4.7 folds better than marketed drugs in inhibiting α-amylase activity. Herbal molecules and rosiglitazone showed comparable results for glucose uptake, which may be attributed to enhanced GLUT4 translocation into primary neuronal culture under hyperglycemic conditions. In conclusion, currently available marketed anti-diabetic drugs have minimal effect on the pathways leading to diabetic neuropathy and supplementing diabetic therapeutics with quercetin, ascorbic acid, caffeine and ellagic acid may be better suited to counter diabetic neuropathy through inhibiting oxidative stress, genotoxicity and improving neuronal glucose utilization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9369,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University","volume":"55 1","pages":"Pages 115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bfopcu.2016.12.002","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quercetin, ascorbic acid, caffeine and ellagic acid are more efficient than rosiglitazone, metformin and glimepiride in interfering with pathways leading to the development of neurological complications associated with diabetes: A comparative in-vitro study\",\"authors\":\"Vineet Mehta ,&nbsp;Parul Verma ,&nbsp;Neelam Sharma ,&nbsp;Arun Sharma ,&nbsp;Aman Thakur ,&nbsp;Udayabanu Malairaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bfopcu.2016.12.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neuropathy is the least understood and most devastating complication associated with diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy develops in patients despite of regular therapy, indicating that marketed drugs has minimal effect on pathways leading to the development and progression of these complications. Present study was aimed to evaluate natural compounds for their ability to interfere with pathways leading to the development of diabetes mediated neurological complications and compare their efficacy with marketed anti-diabetic drugs. Anti-diabetic potential of ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, ellagic acid, cinnamic acid, caffeine and piperine was predicted by evaluating <em>in-silico</em> interaction energy (kcal/mol) of these compounds with insulin receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-γ and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 proteins. Ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin and ellagic acid showed excellent <em>in-vitro</em> antioxidant activity in DPPH radical scavenging and inhibition of lipid peroxidation assay, which was 1.5–3 folds better than the marketed drugs. Quercetin, gallic acid, cinnamic acid, piperine and caffeine efficiently prevented H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> induced genotoxicity, which commercial drugs failed to prevent. Further, quercetin, ellagic acid, caffeine and ascorbic acid were 3–4.7 folds better than marketed drugs in inhibiting α-amylase activity. Herbal molecules and rosiglitazone showed comparable results for glucose uptake, which may be attributed to enhanced GLUT4 translocation into primary neuronal culture under hyperglycemic conditions. In conclusion, currently available marketed anti-diabetic drugs have minimal effect on the pathways leading to diabetic neuropathy and supplementing diabetic therapeutics with quercetin, ascorbic acid, caffeine and ellagic acid may be better suited to counter diabetic neuropathy through inhibiting oxidative stress, genotoxicity and improving neuronal glucose utilization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bfopcu.2016.12.002\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110093116300527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110093116300527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

神经病变是与糖尿病相关的最不为人所知和最具破坏性的并发症。尽管患者接受了常规治疗,但糖尿病神经病变仍会发生,这表明市场上销售的药物对导致这些并发症发生和进展的途径的影响微乎其微。本研究旨在评估天然化合物对糖尿病介导的神经系统并发症通路的干扰能力,并将其与市售抗糖尿病药物的疗效进行比较。通过测定抗坏血酸、没食子酸、槲皮素、鞣花酸、肉桂酸、咖啡因和胡椒碱与胰岛素受体、过氧化物酶体增殖激活受体γ -γ和二肽基肽酶-4蛋白的硅相互作用能(kcal/mol),预测抗坏血酸、没食子酸、槲皮素、鞣花酸、肉桂酸、咖啡因和胡椒碱的抗糖尿病潜能。抗坏血酸、没食子酸、槲皮素和鞣花酸在体外清除DPPH自由基和抑制脂质过氧化实验中表现出优异的抗氧化活性,比市售药物高1.5-3倍。槲皮素、没食子酸、肉桂酸、胡椒碱和咖啡因能有效预防H2O2诱导的遗传毒性,这是市售药物无法预防的。槲皮素、鞣花酸、咖啡因和抗坏血酸对α-淀粉酶活性的抑制效果是市售药物的3-4.7倍。草药分子和罗格列酮在葡萄糖摄取方面显示出相似的结果,这可能归因于在高血糖条件下GLUT4转运到原代神经元培养中。综上所述,目前已上市的抗糖尿病药物对导致糖尿病神经病变的途径影响很小,而槲皮素、抗坏血酸、咖啡因和鞣花酸可能更适合通过抑制氧化应激、遗传毒性和改善神经元葡萄糖利用来对抗糖尿病神经病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quercetin, ascorbic acid, caffeine and ellagic acid are more efficient than rosiglitazone, metformin and glimepiride in interfering with pathways leading to the development of neurological complications associated with diabetes: A comparative in-vitro study

Neuropathy is the least understood and most devastating complication associated with diabetes. Diabetic neuropathy develops in patients despite of regular therapy, indicating that marketed drugs has minimal effect on pathways leading to the development and progression of these complications. Present study was aimed to evaluate natural compounds for their ability to interfere with pathways leading to the development of diabetes mediated neurological complications and compare their efficacy with marketed anti-diabetic drugs. Anti-diabetic potential of ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin, ellagic acid, cinnamic acid, caffeine and piperine was predicted by evaluating in-silico interaction energy (kcal/mol) of these compounds with insulin receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-γ and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 proteins. Ascorbic acid, gallic acid, quercetin and ellagic acid showed excellent in-vitro antioxidant activity in DPPH radical scavenging and inhibition of lipid peroxidation assay, which was 1.5–3 folds better than the marketed drugs. Quercetin, gallic acid, cinnamic acid, piperine and caffeine efficiently prevented H2O2 induced genotoxicity, which commercial drugs failed to prevent. Further, quercetin, ellagic acid, caffeine and ascorbic acid were 3–4.7 folds better than marketed drugs in inhibiting α-amylase activity. Herbal molecules and rosiglitazone showed comparable results for glucose uptake, which may be attributed to enhanced GLUT4 translocation into primary neuronal culture under hyperglycemic conditions. In conclusion, currently available marketed anti-diabetic drugs have minimal effect on the pathways leading to diabetic neuropathy and supplementing diabetic therapeutics with quercetin, ascorbic acid, caffeine and ellagic acid may be better suited to counter diabetic neuropathy through inhibiting oxidative stress, genotoxicity and improving neuronal glucose utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Morphological and Anatomical Characterization of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf Cultivated in Egypt Microbial Contamination Of Non- Sterile Pharmaceutical Drops Produced In Egypt Effect of Selected Essential Oils Against Zoonoses and their Epidemiological Survey Among Domestic Rodents in Egypt Morpho-Anatomical Characters Of The Floral Structures Of Erythrina × Neillii Mabberley And Lorence (Fabaceae) And Their Importance To Species Characterization Phytochemicals, Acute Toxicity and Genotoxicity of Chewing Sticks from Zanthoxylum zanthoxyloides Root and Distemonanthus benthamianus Stem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1