{"title":"开放科学:科学家是赞成的,那么图书管理员呢?","authors":"L. Shevchenko","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author reviews the results of the survey of the researchers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), responses to The State of Open Data survey of researchers in 192 countries (2016–2022), and interviews of the librarians of SB RAS scientific organizations on their attitude to open science and its information support. The study was accomplished within the research project of SB RAS State Public Scientific and Technological Library “Development of the functional model of scientific library in the open science information ecosystem”. The author demonstrates that the researchers have been increasingly publishing their results in the open science (OS) journals, though still are unaware of OS types, doubt OS publications quality, and beware data exchange. The scientists are positive about open science and an open data (OD) system, OD and open-source software, open cooperation between researchers, as well as open peer reviewing. The study also proves that the librarians have been providing traditional services, not very eager about open science support services, doubt their necessity and relevance. The author argues that the librarians have to reconsider their attitude toward open science support, to explore new resources, to expand their competences, and to build the system of integrated information support of scientific research, which makes the libraries active actors in advancing open science practices.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open science: Scientists are in favor, what about the librarians?\",\"authors\":\"L. Shevchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author reviews the results of the survey of the researchers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), responses to The State of Open Data survey of researchers in 192 countries (2016–2022), and interviews of the librarians of SB RAS scientific organizations on their attitude to open science and its information support. The study was accomplished within the research project of SB RAS State Public Scientific and Technological Library “Development of the functional model of scientific library in the open science information ecosystem”. The author demonstrates that the researchers have been increasingly publishing their results in the open science (OS) journals, though still are unaware of OS types, doubt OS publications quality, and beware data exchange. The scientists are positive about open science and an open data (OD) system, OD and open-source software, open cooperation between researchers, as well as open peer reviewing. The study also proves that the librarians have been providing traditional services, not very eager about open science support services, doubt their necessity and relevance. The author argues that the librarians have to reconsider their attitude toward open science support, to explore new resources, to expand their competences, and to build the system of integrated information support of scientific research, which makes the libraries active actors in advancing open science practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-113-131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Open science: Scientists are in favor, what about the librarians?
The author reviews the results of the survey of the researchers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), responses to The State of Open Data survey of researchers in 192 countries (2016–2022), and interviews of the librarians of SB RAS scientific organizations on their attitude to open science and its information support. The study was accomplished within the research project of SB RAS State Public Scientific and Technological Library “Development of the functional model of scientific library in the open science information ecosystem”. The author demonstrates that the researchers have been increasingly publishing their results in the open science (OS) journals, though still are unaware of OS types, doubt OS publications quality, and beware data exchange. The scientists are positive about open science and an open data (OD) system, OD and open-source software, open cooperation between researchers, as well as open peer reviewing. The study also proves that the librarians have been providing traditional services, not very eager about open science support services, doubt their necessity and relevance. The author argues that the librarians have to reconsider their attitude toward open science support, to explore new resources, to expand their competences, and to build the system of integrated information support of scientific research, which makes the libraries active actors in advancing open science practices.