肯尼亚西部米戈里河流域土地利用和土地覆盖变化的动态和驱动因素

Stephen Balaka Opiyo, Godwin Opinde, Sammy Letema
{"title":"肯尼亚西部米戈里河流域土地利用和土地覆盖变化的动态和驱动因素","authors":"Stephen Balaka Opiyo,&nbsp;Godwin Opinde,&nbsp;Sammy Letema","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2022.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding land use and land cover (LULC) change dynamics and their contributing factors are critical for developing sustainable land management strategies. Therefore, this paper assesses the trends and patterns of LULC changes and their drivers in the Migori River watershed in Kenya from 1980 to 2020. The spatial analysis is based on remote sensing data based on the maximum likelihood classifier algorithm; whereas the analysis of the drivers is based on index-based ranking and logistic regression of 318 households’ survey data. The results show that between 1980 and 2020, the watershed experienced a considerable decline in shrub lands by 40.63% (−235.97 km<sup>2</sup>), grasslands by 84.86% (−59.14 km<sup>2</sup>), forests by 52.90% (−98.36 km<sup>2</sup>), water by 82.03% (−39.27 km<sup>2</sup>) and wetlands by 38.44% (−3.69 km<sup>2</sup>); whereas cultivated land, bare land and built-up areas expanded over the same period by 34.25% (+347.42 km<sup>2</sup>), 132.28% (+60.95 km<sup>2</sup>) and 461.20% (+25.32 km<sup>2</sup>), respectively. The results of the household survey revealed that the perceptions of the locals tended to corroborate these observed LULC patterns obtained from spatial analysis, with 60.50% (n = 192) of the respondents reporting a significant expansion in agricultural land use (at p &lt; 0.05), and 75.80% (n = 241) observing a significant decline in forest areas in the watershed (at p &lt; 0.05). Fuel wood collection, timber/poles production, agricultural expansion, population pressure, and high poverty are the major drivers of these LULC changes. The findings also revealed that educational level significantly influenced the survey participants’ perceptions concerning these drivers. The paper concludes that the watershed’s natural landscapes have been undergoing destruction at the expense of human settlement and infrastructural developments driven by anthropogenic activities. Therefore, there is a need, among others, for land use zoning to regulate conflicting land uses on the watershed between settlement, conservation, and agricultural lands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 219-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471422000195/pdfft?md5=5f7558cbc838d2238c076a36b78a5c52&pid=1-s2.0-S2589471422000195-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamics and drivers of land use and land cover changes in Migori River Watershed, western Kenya region\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Balaka Opiyo,&nbsp;Godwin Opinde,&nbsp;Sammy Letema\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsee.2022.11.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding land use and land cover (LULC) change dynamics and their contributing factors are critical for developing sustainable land management strategies. Therefore, this paper assesses the trends and patterns of LULC changes and their drivers in the Migori River watershed in Kenya from 1980 to 2020. The spatial analysis is based on remote sensing data based on the maximum likelihood classifier algorithm; whereas the analysis of the drivers is based on index-based ranking and logistic regression of 318 households’ survey data. The results show that between 1980 and 2020, the watershed experienced a considerable decline in shrub lands by 40.63% (−235.97 km<sup>2</sup>), grasslands by 84.86% (−59.14 km<sup>2</sup>), forests by 52.90% (−98.36 km<sup>2</sup>), water by 82.03% (−39.27 km<sup>2</sup>) and wetlands by 38.44% (−3.69 km<sup>2</sup>); whereas cultivated land, bare land and built-up areas expanded over the same period by 34.25% (+347.42 km<sup>2</sup>), 132.28% (+60.95 km<sup>2</sup>) and 461.20% (+25.32 km<sup>2</sup>), respectively. The results of the household survey revealed that the perceptions of the locals tended to corroborate these observed LULC patterns obtained from spatial analysis, with 60.50% (n = 192) of the respondents reporting a significant expansion in agricultural land use (at p &lt; 0.05), and 75.80% (n = 241) observing a significant decline in forest areas in the watershed (at p &lt; 0.05). Fuel wood collection, timber/poles production, agricultural expansion, population pressure, and high poverty are the major drivers of these LULC changes. The findings also revealed that educational level significantly influenced the survey participants’ perceptions concerning these drivers. The paper concludes that the watershed’s natural landscapes have been undergoing destruction at the expense of human settlement and infrastructural developments driven by anthropogenic activities. Therefore, there is a need, among others, for land use zoning to regulate conflicting land uses on the watershed between settlement, conservation, and agricultural lands.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 219-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471422000195/pdfft?md5=5f7558cbc838d2238c076a36b78a5c52&pid=1-s2.0-S2589471422000195-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471422000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471422000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

了解土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)变化动态及其影响因素对于制定可持续土地管理战略至关重要。因此,本文对1980 - 2020年肯尼亚米戈里河流域土地利用价值变化的趋势、格局及其驱动因素进行了研究。空间分析是基于最大似然分类器算法的遥感数据;而驱动因素的分析则是基于318户调查数据的指数排序和logistic回归。结果表明:1980 ~ 2020年,流域内灌木林地减少40.63% (- 235.97 km2),草地减少84.86% (- 59.14 km2),森林减少52.90% (- 98.36 km2),水体减少82.03% (- 39.27 km2),湿地减少38.44% (- 3.69 km2);同期耕地、裸地和建成区面积分别增长34.25% (+347.42 km2)、132.28% (+60.95 km2)和461.20% (+25.32 km2)。家庭调查的结果显示,当地人的看法倾向于证实从空间分析中获得的这些观察到的LULC模式,60.50% (n = 192)的受访者报告了农业用地的显著扩张(p <0.05), 75.80% (n = 241)观察到流域森林面积显著下降(p <0.05)。燃料木材收集、木材/木杆生产、农业扩张、人口压力和高度贫困是这些LULC变化的主要驱动因素。研究结果还显示,受教育程度显著影响调查参与者对这些司机的看法。该论文的结论是,该流域的自然景观正在遭受破坏,其代价是人类活动驱动的人类住区和基础设施发展。因此,除其他外,有必要进行土地使用分区,以规范定居点、保护和农业用地之间分水岭上的冲突土地使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamics and drivers of land use and land cover changes in Migori River Watershed, western Kenya region

Understanding land use and land cover (LULC) change dynamics and their contributing factors are critical for developing sustainable land management strategies. Therefore, this paper assesses the trends and patterns of LULC changes and their drivers in the Migori River watershed in Kenya from 1980 to 2020. The spatial analysis is based on remote sensing data based on the maximum likelihood classifier algorithm; whereas the analysis of the drivers is based on index-based ranking and logistic regression of 318 households’ survey data. The results show that between 1980 and 2020, the watershed experienced a considerable decline in shrub lands by 40.63% (−235.97 km2), grasslands by 84.86% (−59.14 km2), forests by 52.90% (−98.36 km2), water by 82.03% (−39.27 km2) and wetlands by 38.44% (−3.69 km2); whereas cultivated land, bare land and built-up areas expanded over the same period by 34.25% (+347.42 km2), 132.28% (+60.95 km2) and 461.20% (+25.32 km2), respectively. The results of the household survey revealed that the perceptions of the locals tended to corroborate these observed LULC patterns obtained from spatial analysis, with 60.50% (n = 192) of the respondents reporting a significant expansion in agricultural land use (at p < 0.05), and 75.80% (n = 241) observing a significant decline in forest areas in the watershed (at p < 0.05). Fuel wood collection, timber/poles production, agricultural expansion, population pressure, and high poverty are the major drivers of these LULC changes. The findings also revealed that educational level significantly influenced the survey participants’ perceptions concerning these drivers. The paper concludes that the watershed’s natural landscapes have been undergoing destruction at the expense of human settlement and infrastructural developments driven by anthropogenic activities. Therefore, there is a need, among others, for land use zoning to regulate conflicting land uses on the watershed between settlement, conservation, and agricultural lands.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation of wetland vegetation succession based on coupled Gaussian and population dynamics models: A case study of Poyang Lake wetlands Morphometric analysis of watersheds: A comprehensive review of data sources, quality, and geospatial techniques Flash flood susceptibility mapping of north-east depression of Bangladesh using different GIS based bivariate statistical models Source, fate, toxicity, and remediation of micro-plastic in wetlands: A critical review Effects of Spartina alterniflora control on soil carbon and nitrogen in coastal wetlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1