{"title":"书评:《重新团结——大胆的劳工改革如何修复、振兴和重新团结美国》","authors":"Thomas Klikauer","doi":"10.1177/10242589231152405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"really driven by the changing character of employment in the context of a wide range of societal, political, economic and cultural considerations. Rather than a shortcoming, however, this can be seen as an opportunity to drive new empirical research that would strengthen causal relationships between precariousness and well-being, focusing on post-pandemic labour markets in developed democracies, but also worldwide. To conclude, the book is a timely and important contribution to the relatively large body of literature on precarious work (see, for example, Choonara et al., 2022). While focusing on the drivers and broader effects of precarious work on well-being, it leaves space for more research on the roles of agency and power resources in understanding why precarious work emerges and how it interacts with other aspects of well-being across different institutional settings. The book by Doellgast et al. (2018) partly does justice to the role of agency and power relations in understanding precarious work and solidarity across relevant stakeholders, but the existing body of literature on precarious work and its institutional and welfare buffers is certainly not exhaustive. Rather, it is gaining even more relevance with technological change, and changing paradigms of work, life, policy and institutions in post-COVID labour markets.","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"157 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Re-Union – How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Klikauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10242589231152405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"really driven by the changing character of employment in the context of a wide range of societal, political, economic and cultural considerations. Rather than a shortcoming, however, this can be seen as an opportunity to drive new empirical research that would strengthen causal relationships between precariousness and well-being, focusing on post-pandemic labour markets in developed democracies, but also worldwide. To conclude, the book is a timely and important contribution to the relatively large body of literature on precarious work (see, for example, Choonara et al., 2022). While focusing on the drivers and broader effects of precarious work on well-being, it leaves space for more research on the roles of agency and power resources in understanding why precarious work emerges and how it interacts with other aspects of well-being across different institutional settings. The book by Doellgast et al. (2018) partly does justice to the role of agency and power relations in understanding precarious work and solidarity across relevant stakeholders, but the existing body of literature on precarious work and its institutional and welfare buffers is certainly not exhaustive. Rather, it is gaining even more relevance with technological change, and changing paradigms of work, life, policy and institutions in post-COVID labour markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"157 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231152405\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231152405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在广泛的社会、政治、经济和文化考虑的背景下,就业特征的变化是真正的驱动因素。然而,这不是一个缺点,而是一个推动新的实证研究的机会,这些研究将加强不稳定性与福祉之间的因果关系,重点关注发达民主国家以及全世界的大流行后劳动力市场。总之,这本书是对相对较大的关于不稳定工作的文献的及时和重要贡献(例如,参见Choonara et al., 2022)。在关注不稳定工作对幸福感的驱动因素和更广泛影响的同时,它为更多研究机构和权力资源的作用留下了空间,以理解不稳定工作出现的原因,以及它如何与不同制度背景下的福祉的其他方面相互作用。Doellgast等人(2018)的书在一定程度上公正地评价了代理和权力关系在理解不稳定工作和相关利益相关者团结方面的作用,但现有的关于不稳定工作及其制度和福利缓冲的文献肯定不是详尽的。相反,它与技术变革以及后covid - 19劳动力市场中不断变化的工作、生活、政策和制度范例的相关性越来越强。
Book Review: Re-Union – How Bold Labor Reforms Can Repair, Revitalize, and Reunite the United States
really driven by the changing character of employment in the context of a wide range of societal, political, economic and cultural considerations. Rather than a shortcoming, however, this can be seen as an opportunity to drive new empirical research that would strengthen causal relationships between precariousness and well-being, focusing on post-pandemic labour markets in developed democracies, but also worldwide. To conclude, the book is a timely and important contribution to the relatively large body of literature on precarious work (see, for example, Choonara et al., 2022). While focusing on the drivers and broader effects of precarious work on well-being, it leaves space for more research on the roles of agency and power resources in understanding why precarious work emerges and how it interacts with other aspects of well-being across different institutional settings. The book by Doellgast et al. (2018) partly does justice to the role of agency and power relations in understanding precarious work and solidarity across relevant stakeholders, but the existing body of literature on precarious work and its institutional and welfare buffers is certainly not exhaustive. Rather, it is gaining even more relevance with technological change, and changing paradigms of work, life, policy and institutions in post-COVID labour markets.