评价与改进学生评价教学的形成性运用

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960
Kamel Omer, Shoshanah Jacobs, K. Cottenie, William Bettger, John F. Dawson, Steffen Graether, Coral Murrant, J. Zettel, Genevieve Newton
{"title":"评价与改进学生评价教学的形成性运用","authors":"Kamel Omer, Shoshanah Jacobs, K. Cottenie, William Bettger, John F. Dawson, Steffen Graether, Coral Murrant, J. Zettel, Genevieve Newton","doi":"10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) are a ubiquitous tool in higher education. Though they are not effective means of evaluating teaching ability, they are useful in formative teaching development of a teaching career. We characterise the current formative use of and attitudes towards SETs by instructors across all disciplines (STEM and non-STEM). We found that tenured instructors used SETs for formative development more than untenured, and that non-STEM instructors had more negative associations with SETs than STEM instructors. Based upon these data, we make recommendations to redesign the SET instrument and change the way in which the data are used to support formative teaching development.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating and Improving the Formative Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching\",\"authors\":\"Kamel Omer, Shoshanah Jacobs, K. Cottenie, William Bettger, John F. Dawson, Steffen Graether, Coral Murrant, J. Zettel, Genevieve Newton\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) are a ubiquitous tool in higher education. Though they are not effective means of evaluating teaching ability, they are useful in formative teaching development of a teaching career. We characterise the current formative use of and attitudes towards SETs by instructors across all disciplines (STEM and non-STEM). We found that tenured instructors used SETs for formative development more than untenured, and that non-STEM instructors had more negative associations with SETs than STEM instructors. Based upon these data, we make recommendations to redesign the SET instrument and change the way in which the data are used to support formative teaching development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.10960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学生教学评价(set)是高等教育中普遍使用的工具。虽然它们不是评价教学能力的有效手段,但它们对教师生涯形成性教学的发展是有益的。我们描述了目前所有学科(STEM和非STEM)教师对set的形成性使用和态度。我们发现,终身教职教师比非终身教职教师更多地使用set进行形成性发展,非STEM教师比STEM教师与set有更多的负相关。基于这些数据,我们建议重新设计SET工具,并改变数据用于支持形成性教学发展的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating and Improving the Formative Use of Student Evaluation of Teaching
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) are a ubiquitous tool in higher education. Though they are not effective means of evaluating teaching ability, they are useful in formative teaching development of a teaching career. We characterise the current formative use of and attitudes towards SETs by instructors across all disciplines (STEM and non-STEM). We found that tenured instructors used SETs for formative development more than untenured, and that non-STEM instructors had more negative associations with SETs than STEM instructors. Based upon these data, we make recommendations to redesign the SET instrument and change the way in which the data are used to support formative teaching development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Integrating Writing and Writing Instruction into a Research Methods Course Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Barriers to Study Abroad Renewing our Commitment to Teaching Excellence through SoTL: An Introduction to Issue 14.1 Developing an Undergraduate Career Conference: Leveraging Mentorship to Promote Career Discovery Facilitated Study Groups for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Experience from a Large Public Canadian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1