{"title":"破坏,生存和临床医生的使用:在与具有挑战性的病人一起工作时保留自我客体体验的机会","authors":"G. Hagman","doi":"10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Many patients resist engagement in the therapeutic relationship because they fear the traumatic consequences of the mobilization of thwarted selfobject needs in what they fear will be a faulty, nonempathic environment. At times this resistance is manifest in “narcissistic rage” as described by Heinz Kohut. Providing opportunities for selfobject experience in work with these patients can be challenging. In his 1971 paper The Use of the Object, D.W. Winnicott described a developmental process in which the state of omnipotent merger with important objects undergoes a transformation in which the other is increasingly recognized as not only outside the self, but also in possession of a subjectivity of its own and thus can be made use of. In work with some seriously and persistently mentally ill, the client’s capacity to make use of the clinician is poorly developed or highly conflicted. Given this the clinical process in which the client achieves the recognition of the worker and trust in their intentions—and hence can make use of them as a selfobject, is often prolonged and stormy. A case is discussed at length that illustrates this. The report documents the importance of holding, containment, management of the countertransference, and survival strategies for the clinician. It also shows the patient’s growing ability to make use of the clinician as a selfobject as she struggles to understand and cope with changes in her life world and self-experience.","PeriodicalId":42308,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","volume":"88 1","pages":"14 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Destruction, survival and the use of the clinician: Preserving opportunities for selfobject experience in work with challenging patients\",\"authors\":\"G. Hagman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Many patients resist engagement in the therapeutic relationship because they fear the traumatic consequences of the mobilization of thwarted selfobject needs in what they fear will be a faulty, nonempathic environment. At times this resistance is manifest in “narcissistic rage” as described by Heinz Kohut. Providing opportunities for selfobject experience in work with these patients can be challenging. In his 1971 paper The Use of the Object, D.W. Winnicott described a developmental process in which the state of omnipotent merger with important objects undergoes a transformation in which the other is increasingly recognized as not only outside the self, but also in possession of a subjectivity of its own and thus can be made use of. In work with some seriously and persistently mentally ill, the client’s capacity to make use of the clinician is poorly developed or highly conflicted. Given this the clinical process in which the client achieves the recognition of the worker and trust in their intentions—and hence can make use of them as a selfobject, is often prolonged and stormy. A case is discussed at length that illustrates this. The report documents the importance of holding, containment, management of the countertransference, and survival strategies for the clinician. It also shows the patient’s growing ability to make use of the clinician as a selfobject as she struggles to understand and cope with changes in her life world and self-experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalysis Self and Context\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"14 - 25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalysis Self and Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalysis Self and Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2022.2154772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOANALYSIS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
许多患者拒绝参与治疗关系,因为他们害怕在他们担心的错误的、非共情的环境中调动受挫的自我客体需求会带来创伤性后果。有时,这种抗拒表现为Heinz Kohut所说的“自恋的愤怒”。在治疗这些病人时提供自我客体体验的机会是具有挑战性的。D.W.温尼科特(D.W. Winnicott)在其1971年的论文《客体的使用》(The Use of The Object)中描述了一个发展过程,在这个过程中,与重要客体的全能合并状态经历了一种转变,在这种转变中,他者越来越被认为不仅是在自我之外,而且拥有自己的主观性,因此可以被利用。在治疗一些严重和持续的精神疾病时,病人利用临床医生的能力发展不足或高度冲突。鉴于此,在临床过程中,来访者获得了对工作者的认可和对他们意图的信任——因此可以将他们作为一个自我客体来利用——往往是漫长而激烈的。详细讨论了一个案例来说明这一点。该报告记录了临床医生控制、遏制、反移情管理和生存策略的重要性。它还显示了病人在努力理解和应对生活世界和自我体验的变化时,将临床医生作为自我客体的能力日益增强。
Destruction, survival and the use of the clinician: Preserving opportunities for selfobject experience in work with challenging patients
ABSTRACT Many patients resist engagement in the therapeutic relationship because they fear the traumatic consequences of the mobilization of thwarted selfobject needs in what they fear will be a faulty, nonempathic environment. At times this resistance is manifest in “narcissistic rage” as described by Heinz Kohut. Providing opportunities for selfobject experience in work with these patients can be challenging. In his 1971 paper The Use of the Object, D.W. Winnicott described a developmental process in which the state of omnipotent merger with important objects undergoes a transformation in which the other is increasingly recognized as not only outside the self, but also in possession of a subjectivity of its own and thus can be made use of. In work with some seriously and persistently mentally ill, the client’s capacity to make use of the clinician is poorly developed or highly conflicted. Given this the clinical process in which the client achieves the recognition of the worker and trust in their intentions—and hence can make use of them as a selfobject, is often prolonged and stormy. A case is discussed at length that illustrates this. The report documents the importance of holding, containment, management of the countertransference, and survival strategies for the clinician. It also shows the patient’s growing ability to make use of the clinician as a selfobject as she struggles to understand and cope with changes in her life world and self-experience.