银行和金融服务中的消费者自主权和可移植性之路

Michael S. Barr, Abigail E. DeHart, Andrew Kang
{"title":"银行和金融服务中的消费者自主权和可移植性之路","authors":"Michael S. Barr, Abigail E. DeHart, Andrew Kang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3483757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the critical ways to promote economic security is by making financial services work better for more American families. Efforts to build a financial system that promotes consumer autonomy will involve innovation and reforms to our payment systems and more broadly, our policy and legal infrastructure. Such advances help empower consumers and harness technological innovation, but they also need to be grounded with strong consumer protections—especially in an era where people increasingly turn to technology to manage their financial lives. This white paper is designed to spark conversation among academics, private sector stakeholders, public interest organizations, legislators, policy-makers, and regulators about how to approach consumer financial data.<br><br>Consumer financial data is playing an increasingly important role in driving value creation in the financial services sector. Banks can now leverage advanced processing technologies to obtain new insights about client behavior to develop smarter projects. At the same time, data has fueled innovation by financial technology service providers (“FSPs”) that source data from banks. These service providers harness the data to create products and services that perform key consumer financial activities once handled entirely by banks and offer new experiences that banks themselves are often not delivering.<br><br>But who owns a customer’s financial data? FSPs assert that consumers should be empowered to own their own data, especially as this would introduce new competition into the financial service sector. Many banks, however, contend that opening up consumer information to third parties raises serious risks of fraud and abuse. Both sides of the debate advocate for the consumer’s interest: banks on the grounds of security and privacy, and the fintech sector on the grounds of access and innovation.","PeriodicalId":83420,"journal":{"name":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer Autonomy and Pathways to Portability in Banking and Financial Services\",\"authors\":\"Michael S. Barr, Abigail E. DeHart, Andrew Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3483757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the critical ways to promote economic security is by making financial services work better for more American families. Efforts to build a financial system that promotes consumer autonomy will involve innovation and reforms to our payment systems and more broadly, our policy and legal infrastructure. Such advances help empower consumers and harness technological innovation, but they also need to be grounded with strong consumer protections—especially in an era where people increasingly turn to technology to manage their financial lives. This white paper is designed to spark conversation among academics, private sector stakeholders, public interest organizations, legislators, policy-makers, and regulators about how to approach consumer financial data.<br><br>Consumer financial data is playing an increasingly important role in driving value creation in the financial services sector. Banks can now leverage advanced processing technologies to obtain new insights about client behavior to develop smarter projects. At the same time, data has fueled innovation by financial technology service providers (“FSPs”) that source data from banks. These service providers harness the data to create products and services that perform key consumer financial activities once handled entirely by banks and offer new experiences that banks themselves are often not delivering.<br><br>But who owns a customer’s financial data? FSPs assert that consumers should be empowered to own their own data, especially as this would introduce new competition into the financial service sector. Many banks, however, contend that opening up consumer information to third parties raises serious risks of fraud and abuse. Both sides of the debate advocate for the consumer’s interest: banks on the grounds of security and privacy, and the fintech sector on the grounds of access and innovation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Michigan journal of law reform. University of Michigan. Law School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

促进经济安全的关键途径之一是让金融服务更好地为更多的美国家庭服务。建立一个促进消费者自主的金融体系的努力将涉及对我们的支付系统以及更广泛的政策和法律基础设施的创新和改革。这些进步有助于赋予消费者权力并利用技术创新,但它们也需要以强有力的消费者保护为基础——尤其是在人们越来越多地转向技术来管理他们的财务生活的时代。本白皮书旨在激发学术界、私营部门利益相关者、公共利益组织、立法者、政策制定者和监管机构就如何处理消费者金融数据进行对话。消费者金融数据在推动金融服务业的价值创造方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。银行现在可以利用先进的处理技术来获得有关客户行为的新见解,从而开发更智能的项目。与此同时,数据也推动了从银行获取数据的金融技术服务提供商(“fsp”)的创新。这些服务提供商利用这些数据创建产品和服务,执行过去完全由银行处理的关键消费者金融活动,并提供银行自己通常无法提供的新体验。但是谁拥有客户的财务数据呢?金融服务提供商断言,消费者应该有权拥有自己的数据,特别是因为这将给金融服务部门带来新的竞争。然而,许多银行认为,向第三方开放消费者信息会增加欺诈和滥用的严重风险。辩论的双方都主张维护消费者的利益:基于安全和隐私的银行,以及基于准入和创新的金融科技行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer Autonomy and Pathways to Portability in Banking and Financial Services
One of the critical ways to promote economic security is by making financial services work better for more American families. Efforts to build a financial system that promotes consumer autonomy will involve innovation and reforms to our payment systems and more broadly, our policy and legal infrastructure. Such advances help empower consumers and harness technological innovation, but they also need to be grounded with strong consumer protections—especially in an era where people increasingly turn to technology to manage their financial lives. This white paper is designed to spark conversation among academics, private sector stakeholders, public interest organizations, legislators, policy-makers, and regulators about how to approach consumer financial data.

Consumer financial data is playing an increasingly important role in driving value creation in the financial services sector. Banks can now leverage advanced processing technologies to obtain new insights about client behavior to develop smarter projects. At the same time, data has fueled innovation by financial technology service providers (“FSPs”) that source data from banks. These service providers harness the data to create products and services that perform key consumer financial activities once handled entirely by banks and offer new experiences that banks themselves are often not delivering.

But who owns a customer’s financial data? FSPs assert that consumers should be empowered to own their own data, especially as this would introduce new competition into the financial service sector. Many banks, however, contend that opening up consumer information to third parties raises serious risks of fraud and abuse. Both sides of the debate advocate for the consumer’s interest: banks on the grounds of security and privacy, and the fintech sector on the grounds of access and innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System Out of Balance: A Critical Analysis of Philosophical Justifications for Copyright Law Through the Lenz of Users' Rights Giving the Fourth Amendment Meaning: Creating an Adversarial Warrant Proceeding to Protect From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures Private Caregiver Presumption For Elder Caregivers The Short Unhappy Life of the Negotiation Class Former Whistleblowers: Why the False Claims Act's Anti-Retaliation Provision Should Protect Former Employees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1