中国政商融合——能创造价值吗?政治关系与企业绩效的关系

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Strategy and Management Pub Date : 2023-07-24 DOI:10.1108/jsma-03-2023-0041
Xiaoyu Yang, Longzhu Dong, A. Nahm
{"title":"中国政商融合——能创造价值吗?政治关系与企业绩效的关系","authors":"Xiaoyu Yang, Longzhu Dong, A. Nahm","doi":"10.1108/jsma-03-2023-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to examine how business executives' political connections are associated with government subsidies and strategic change, and how they, in turn, influence firm performance, measured by return on assets (ROA) and market share.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses were tested using the large firm-level dataset provided by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China for the period 2003–2013. This is one of the most comprehensive datasets of Chinese manufacturing companies and includes 321,722 firms on average per year, which spans over 37 industries.FindingsThe authors found that political connections, measured by senior executives' membership in the National People's Congress of China (NPC), were positively associated with government subsidies but were not associated with strategic change. Also, government subsidies, as the underlying mechanism, mediated the relationships between NPC membership and firm performance but strategic change did not.Research limitations/implicationsBy examining the possible mediators between corporate political strategies and firm performance, the authors confirmed the thought that the impact of political connections on firm performance is a complex phenomenon and goes beyond a simple direct effect. However, future research could explore other mediators in this relationship.Originality/valueWhile the direct relationship between political connections and firm performance has been examined in management literature, the results are mixed. For the first time, the authors addressed the gap and opened the “black box” – the underlying mechanisms of this relationship. This study's findings contribute to the literature on corporate political activity, strategic change, and their influences on firm performance.","PeriodicalId":46229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategy and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mingling business and politics in China – Does it build value? The relationship between political connection and firm performance\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Yang, Longzhu Dong, A. Nahm\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsma-03-2023-0041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims to examine how business executives' political connections are associated with government subsidies and strategic change, and how they, in turn, influence firm performance, measured by return on assets (ROA) and market share.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses were tested using the large firm-level dataset provided by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China for the period 2003–2013. This is one of the most comprehensive datasets of Chinese manufacturing companies and includes 321,722 firms on average per year, which spans over 37 industries.FindingsThe authors found that political connections, measured by senior executives' membership in the National People's Congress of China (NPC), were positively associated with government subsidies but were not associated with strategic change. Also, government subsidies, as the underlying mechanism, mediated the relationships between NPC membership and firm performance but strategic change did not.Research limitations/implicationsBy examining the possible mediators between corporate political strategies and firm performance, the authors confirmed the thought that the impact of political connections on firm performance is a complex phenomenon and goes beyond a simple direct effect. However, future research could explore other mediators in this relationship.Originality/valueWhile the direct relationship between political connections and firm performance has been examined in management literature, the results are mixed. For the first time, the authors addressed the gap and opened the “black box” – the underlying mechanisms of this relationship. This study's findings contribute to the literature on corporate political activity, strategic change, and their influences on firm performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strategy and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strategy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-03-2023-0041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-03-2023-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨企业高管的政治关系如何与政府补贴和战略变革相关联,以及它们如何反过来影响企业绩效(以资产回报率(ROA)和市场份额衡量)。设计/方法/方法使用中国国家统计局(NBS)提供的2003-2013年间大型企业数据集对假设进行了检验。这是中国制造业企业最全面的数据集之一,平均每年包括321,722家企业,涵盖37个行业。研究结果作者发现,以高管在中国全国人民代表大会(NPC)中的席位来衡量的政治关系与政府补贴呈正相关,但与战略变革无关。此外,政府补贴作为潜在机制,在人大成员资格与企业绩效之间起到中介作用,而战略变革没有起到中介作用。通过考察企业政治战略与企业绩效之间可能的中介关系,作者证实了政治关系对企业绩效的影响是一个复杂的现象,超越了简单的直接影响。然而,未来的研究可以探索这种关系中的其他中介。原创性/价值虽然在管理学文献中研究了政治关系和公司绩效之间的直接关系,但结果好坏参半。作者第一次解决了这一差距,并打开了“黑盒子”——这种关系的潜在机制。本研究的发现有助于研究公司政治活动、战略变革及其对公司绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mingling business and politics in China – Does it build value? The relationship between political connection and firm performance
PurposeThis study aims to examine how business executives' political connections are associated with government subsidies and strategic change, and how they, in turn, influence firm performance, measured by return on assets (ROA) and market share.Design/methodology/approachHypotheses were tested using the large firm-level dataset provided by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) of China for the period 2003–2013. This is one of the most comprehensive datasets of Chinese manufacturing companies and includes 321,722 firms on average per year, which spans over 37 industries.FindingsThe authors found that political connections, measured by senior executives' membership in the National People's Congress of China (NPC), were positively associated with government subsidies but were not associated with strategic change. Also, government subsidies, as the underlying mechanism, mediated the relationships between NPC membership and firm performance but strategic change did not.Research limitations/implicationsBy examining the possible mediators between corporate political strategies and firm performance, the authors confirmed the thought that the impact of political connections on firm performance is a complex phenomenon and goes beyond a simple direct effect. However, future research could explore other mediators in this relationship.Originality/valueWhile the direct relationship between political connections and firm performance has been examined in management literature, the results are mixed. For the first time, the authors addressed the gap and opened the “black box” – the underlying mechanisms of this relationship. This study's findings contribute to the literature on corporate political activity, strategic change, and their influences on firm performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategy and Management is an international journal dedicated to: -improving the existing knowledge and understanding of strategy development and implementation globally in private and public organizations -encouraging new thinking and innovative approaches to the study of strategy -offering executives strategic insights based on outcomes of original scholarly research; and -establishing effective communication between researchers and executives managing public and private organizations.
期刊最新文献
Promoting BMI through organizational culture: the mediating role of strategic flexibility Stablecoins and inflation in Latin America: the case of Argentina Farmers’ willingness to adopt digital application tools in Ogun State, Nigeria The effect of technological overlap on acquisition premiums: moderating roles of target firm's technology clockspeed and industry munificence Knowledge management as a driver of economic performance in the Spanish wine industry: the mediating role of open innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1