游泳表现有和没有通气管和潜在的能量差异

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.22462/07.08.2021.1
N. Schellart
{"title":"游泳表现有和没有通气管和潜在的能量差异","authors":"N. Schellart","doi":"10.22462/07.08.2021.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Swimming requires frequent lifting and rotating of the head to inhale. A snorkeler saves energy by avoiding this maneuver, but the snorkel adds breathing work due to air flow resistance. The needed power of these head movements has never been examined, although the extra power of breathing through a snorkel was studied recently. This study aimed: 1) to model the work of vertically lifting and rotating in comparison with the breathing work added by a snorkel; 2) to compare heart rate (HR) and velocity (v) while swimming under both conditions; 3) to evaluate the results for surface-swimming divers. Presumably the power when using a snorkel is less, and the difference in power predicts the difference in swimming velocity. Kinematics of head lifting and rotation, and the difference between the hydrodynamics were modeled. A swim test lasting 12 minutes at maximum speed (Cooper swim test) was performed in a pool by nine recreational divers in the front crawl style, with face mask but without fins. All subjects performed the test both with and without snorkel. The average velocity with a snorkel, 0.72±0.09 m∙s-1, was 4.4±3.9% higher than without (p=0.008), but HR (144±16 bpm) showed no difference (0.8±3.4%). The model based on our subjects’ performance showed that 7.5% of the total power is spent in the inhaling maneuver while crawling and 2.7% while snorkeling. Theoretically this would allow the snorkeler to swim 5.2% faster. It is concluded that snorkeling is energetically advantageous as well as for divers swimming on the surface.","PeriodicalId":49396,"journal":{"name":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Swim performance with and without snorkel and the underlying energetic differences\",\"authors\":\"N. Schellart\",\"doi\":\"10.22462/07.08.2021.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Swimming requires frequent lifting and rotating of the head to inhale. A snorkeler saves energy by avoiding this maneuver, but the snorkel adds breathing work due to air flow resistance. The needed power of these head movements has never been examined, although the extra power of breathing through a snorkel was studied recently. This study aimed: 1) to model the work of vertically lifting and rotating in comparison with the breathing work added by a snorkel; 2) to compare heart rate (HR) and velocity (v) while swimming under both conditions; 3) to evaluate the results for surface-swimming divers. Presumably the power when using a snorkel is less, and the difference in power predicts the difference in swimming velocity. Kinematics of head lifting and rotation, and the difference between the hydrodynamics were modeled. A swim test lasting 12 minutes at maximum speed (Cooper swim test) was performed in a pool by nine recreational divers in the front crawl style, with face mask but without fins. All subjects performed the test both with and without snorkel. The average velocity with a snorkel, 0.72±0.09 m∙s-1, was 4.4±3.9% higher than without (p=0.008), but HR (144±16 bpm) showed no difference (0.8±3.4%). The model based on our subjects’ performance showed that 7.5% of the total power is spent in the inhaling maneuver while crawling and 2.7% while snorkeling. Theoretically this would allow the snorkeler to swim 5.2% faster. It is concluded that snorkeling is energetically advantageous as well as for divers swimming on the surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22462/07.08.2021.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22462/07.08.2021.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

游泳需要经常抬起和旋转头部来吸气。浮潜者通过避免这种动作来节省能量,但由于气流阻力,浮潜增加了呼吸功。这些头部运动所需的力量从未被研究过,尽管最近研究了通过通气管呼吸的额外力量。本研究的目的是:1)模拟垂直升降和旋转的功,并与通气管增加的呼吸功进行比较;2)比较两种情况下游泳时的心率(HR)和速度(v);3)对水面游泳潜水员的结果进行评价。据推测,使用通气管时的功率较小,而功率的差异预示着游泳速度的差异。建立了头部升降和旋转的运动学模型,并对二者的流体力学差异进行了建模。9名休闲潜水员在游泳池中进行了12分钟的最大速度游泳试验(库珀游泳试验),他们采用前爬泳方式,戴口罩,不戴脚蹼。所有受试者都进行了有和没有通气管的测试。通气后平均流速为0.72±0.09 m∙s-1,比未通气时高4.4±3.9% (p=0.008),但心率(144±16 bpm)差异无统计学意义(0.8±3.4%)。基于实验对象表现的模型显示,爬行时吸入动作消耗了总能量的7.5%,浮潜时则消耗了2.7%。理论上,这将使浮潜者的游泳速度提高5.2%。结果表明,浮潜不仅有利于潜水者在水面上游泳,而且对能量也有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Swim performance with and without snorkel and the underlying energetic differences
Swimming requires frequent lifting and rotating of the head to inhale. A snorkeler saves energy by avoiding this maneuver, but the snorkel adds breathing work due to air flow resistance. The needed power of these head movements has never been examined, although the extra power of breathing through a snorkel was studied recently. This study aimed: 1) to model the work of vertically lifting and rotating in comparison with the breathing work added by a snorkel; 2) to compare heart rate (HR) and velocity (v) while swimming under both conditions; 3) to evaluate the results for surface-swimming divers. Presumably the power when using a snorkel is less, and the difference in power predicts the difference in swimming velocity. Kinematics of head lifting and rotation, and the difference between the hydrodynamics were modeled. A swim test lasting 12 minutes at maximum speed (Cooper swim test) was performed in a pool by nine recreational divers in the front crawl style, with face mask but without fins. All subjects performed the test both with and without snorkel. The average velocity with a snorkel, 0.72±0.09 m∙s-1, was 4.4±3.9% higher than without (p=0.008), but HR (144±16 bpm) showed no difference (0.8±3.4%). The model based on our subjects’ performance showed that 7.5% of the total power is spent in the inhaling maneuver while crawling and 2.7% while snorkeling. Theoretically this would allow the snorkeler to swim 5.2% faster. It is concluded that snorkeling is energetically advantageous as well as for divers swimming on the surface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine
Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 医学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal accepts manuscripts for publication that are related to the areas of diving research and physiology, hyperbaric medicine and oxygen therapy, submarine medicine, naval medicine and clinical research related to the above topics. To be considered for UHM scientific papers must deal with significant and new research in an area related to biological, physical and clinical phenomena related to the above environments.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of the treatment outcomes of cerebral gas embolism at 2.8 ATA in comparison with 6 ATA. Behavior and changes in rectal temperature in dogs and cats undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy: clinical data review. Does hyperbaric chamber attendance pose an asthma risk? Case report. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss - A Comorbidity Lens. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treatment of vascular occlusion after permanent dermal filler injection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1