改善研究文化规范,鼓励透明度和严谨性

IF 3.784 3区 化学 Q1 Chemistry ACS Combinatorial Science Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329
David Mellor
{"title":"改善研究文化规范,鼓励透明度和严谨性","authors":"David Mellor","doi":"10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Improving research culture to value transparency and rigor is necessary to engage in a productive “Credibility Revolution.” The field of educational psychology is well positioned to act toward this goal. It will take specific actions by both grassroots groups plus leadership to set standards that will ensure that getting published, funded, or hired is determined by universally supported ideals. These improved standards must ensure that transparency, rigor, and credibility are valued above novelty, impact, and incredibility. Grassroots groups advocate for change and share experience so that the next generation of researchers have the experience needed to sustain these early moves. Each community can take inspiration from others that have made shifts toward better practices. These instances provide opportunities for emulating trail-blazers, training for new practices such as preregistration, and constructively evaluating or criticizing practice in ways that advances the reputation of all involved.","PeriodicalId":14,"journal":{"name":"ACS Combinatorial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7840,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving norms in research culture to incentivize transparency and rigor\",\"authors\":\"David Mellor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Improving research culture to value transparency and rigor is necessary to engage in a productive “Credibility Revolution.” The field of educational psychology is well positioned to act toward this goal. It will take specific actions by both grassroots groups plus leadership to set standards that will ensure that getting published, funded, or hired is determined by universally supported ideals. These improved standards must ensure that transparency, rigor, and credibility are valued above novelty, impact, and incredibility. Grassroots groups advocate for change and share experience so that the next generation of researchers have the experience needed to sustain these early moves. Each community can take inspiration from others that have made shifts toward better practices. These instances provide opportunities for emulating trail-blazers, training for new practices such as preregistration, and constructively evaluating or criticizing practice in ways that advances the reputation of all involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Combinatorial Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7840,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Combinatorial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Combinatorial Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

改善研究文化,重视透明度和严谨性,是开展富有成效的“可信度革命”的必要条件。教育心理学领域为实现这一目标做好了准备。它将由基层团体和领导层共同采取具体行动来制定标准,以确保出版、资助或雇用都是由普遍支持的理想决定的。这些改进后的标准必须确保透明度、严谨性和可信度高于新颖性、影响力和可信度。基层组织倡导变革并分享经验,以便下一代研究人员拥有维持这些早期行动所需的经验。每个社区都可以从其他已经转向更好实践的社区获得灵感。这些实例提供了模仿先行者的机会,为新实践(如预注册)提供培训,并以提高所有相关人员声誉的方式建设性地评估或批评实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving norms in research culture to incentivize transparency and rigor
Abstract Improving research culture to value transparency and rigor is necessary to engage in a productive “Credibility Revolution.” The field of educational psychology is well positioned to act toward this goal. It will take specific actions by both grassroots groups plus leadership to set standards that will ensure that getting published, funded, or hired is determined by universally supported ideals. These improved standards must ensure that transparency, rigor, and credibility are valued above novelty, impact, and incredibility. Grassroots groups advocate for change and share experience so that the next generation of researchers have the experience needed to sustain these early moves. Each community can take inspiration from others that have made shifts toward better practices. These instances provide opportunities for emulating trail-blazers, training for new practices such as preregistration, and constructively evaluating or criticizing practice in ways that advances the reputation of all involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Combinatorial Science
ACS Combinatorial Science CHEMISTRY, APPLIED-CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry has been relaunched as ACS Combinatorial Science under the leadership of new Editor-in-Chief M.G. Finn of The Scripps Research Institute. The journal features an expanded scope and will build upon the legacy of the Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, a highly cited leader in the field.
期刊最新文献
Reply. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis. The role of endometrial scratching in IVF/ICSI: a critical appraisal of individual participant data meta-analysis. Does the holy grail of the evidence pyramid vindicate the controversial practice of endometrial scratching or is there room for healthy skepticism? Reply. How much evidence is needed to stop calling endometrial scratching 'controversial'? Cellular mechanisms of monozygotic twinning: clues from assisted reproduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1