罗伯特·默顿与科学社会学:《科学社会学:理论与实证研究》,罗伯特·默顿著

K. Prewitt
{"title":"罗伯特·默顿与科学社会学:《科学社会学:理论与实证研究》,罗伯特·默顿著","authors":"K. Prewitt","doi":"10.1353/sor.2022.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 1949, Robert Merton asked: \"Why did sociology document the problems and performance of the professional thief … but not the problems and performance of the professional social scientist?\" Unsuccessfully, he argued for a systematic study of the \"social science of social science.\" This essay, seven decades later, returns to Merton's question, now reframed as \"using science as evidence in public policy.\" Policy use is less robust than it can and should be. This would not be the case if Merton's systematic study had been mounted. The good news is that it is not too late.","PeriodicalId":21868,"journal":{"name":"Social Research: An International Quarterly","volume":"7 1","pages":"433 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robert Merton and the Sociology of Science: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Robert K. Merton\",\"authors\":\"K. Prewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sor.2022.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 1949, Robert Merton asked: \\\"Why did sociology document the problems and performance of the professional thief … but not the problems and performance of the professional social scientist?\\\" Unsuccessfully, he argued for a systematic study of the \\\"social science of social science.\\\" This essay, seven decades later, returns to Merton's question, now reframed as \\\"using science as evidence in public policy.\\\" Policy use is less robust than it can and should be. This would not be the case if Merton's systematic study had been mounted. The good news is that it is not too late.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Research: An International Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"433 - 445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Research: An International Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2022.0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Research: An International Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2022.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:1949年,罗伯特·默顿(Robert Merton)提出了一个问题:“为什么社会学记录了职业小偷的问题和表现……而没有记录职业社会科学家的问题和表现?”他主张对“社会科学的社会科学”进行系统的研究,但没有成功。七十年后,这篇文章回到了默顿的问题,现在被重新定义为“在公共政策中使用科学作为证据”。政策的使用不如它能够和应该做到的那么稳健。如果默顿的系统研究得到加强,情况就不会如此了。好消息是,现在还为时不晚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robert Merton and the Sociology of Science: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Robert K. Merton
Abstract:In 1949, Robert Merton asked: "Why did sociology document the problems and performance of the professional thief … but not the problems and performance of the professional social scientist?" Unsuccessfully, he argued for a systematic study of the "social science of social science." This essay, seven decades later, returns to Merton's question, now reframed as "using science as evidence in public policy." Policy use is less robust than it can and should be. This would not be the case if Merton's systematic study had been mounted. The good news is that it is not too late.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Invisibility or Blindness? On Attention, the Unseen, and the Seen Impatient Consumers All He Needed Was a Hull: Slow Criticism in Cancel Culture Times Notes on Contributors Being Online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1