审计独立性标准的实证观察:审计师和教师的感知

B.J. Machado de Almeida
{"title":"审计独立性标准的实证观察:审计师和教师的感知","authors":"B.J. Machado de Almeida","doi":"10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions of the auditors and teachers in relation to the issue of independence in auditing. We used appropriate statistic instruments and gathered the opinions of a sample of 1275 questionnaires given to these professionals, which obtained an answer rate of 35% and correspond to 447 questionnaires fully answered. The results allow us to conclude that there are particular specificities, not very efficient control structures, profound differences regarding this concept depending on the group under study, and a set of similarities with the international research. The research is innovative, nationally and internationally, due to the richness given by the diversity of the perceptions. As for the contributions, we enhance that this is the first study with an empirical basis ever done in Portugal and that it allows us to alert the professional orders and institutions to improve the safeguard of independence mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101212,"journal":{"name":"Tékhne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.07.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical observation of the criteria for independence in auditing: Perception of auditors and teachers\",\"authors\":\"B.J. Machado de Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions of the auditors and teachers in relation to the issue of independence in auditing. We used appropriate statistic instruments and gathered the opinions of a sample of 1275 questionnaires given to these professionals, which obtained an answer rate of 35% and correspond to 447 questionnaires fully answered. The results allow us to conclude that there are particular specificities, not very efficient control structures, profound differences regarding this concept depending on the group under study, and a set of similarities with the international research. The research is innovative, nationally and internationally, due to the richness given by the diversity of the perceptions. As for the contributions, we enhance that this is the first study with an empirical basis ever done in Portugal and that it allows us to alert the professional orders and institutions to improve the safeguard of independence mechanisms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tékhne\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2015.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tékhne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S164599111500033X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tékhne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S164599111500033X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是确定审计师和教师对审计独立性问题的看法。我们使用了合适的统计工具,对发放给这些专业人员的1275份问卷样本进行了意见收集,得到了35%的答复率,其中有447份问卷得到了完整的回答。研究结果使我们得出结论,这一概念存在特定的特殊性,不是非常有效的控制结构,根据所研究的群体,这一概念存在深刻的差异,并且与国际研究有一些相似之处。由于观念的多样性所带来的丰富性,这项研究在国内和国际上都具有创新性。至于贡献,我们强调,这是在葡萄牙进行的第一项具有经验基础的研究,它使我们能够提醒专业订单和机构改善独立机制的保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical observation of the criteria for independence in auditing: Perception of auditors and teachers

The objective of this study is to determine the perceptions of the auditors and teachers in relation to the issue of independence in auditing. We used appropriate statistic instruments and gathered the opinions of a sample of 1275 questionnaires given to these professionals, which obtained an answer rate of 35% and correspond to 447 questionnaires fully answered. The results allow us to conclude that there are particular specificities, not very efficient control structures, profound differences regarding this concept depending on the group under study, and a set of similarities with the international research. The research is innovative, nationally and internationally, due to the richness given by the diversity of the perceptions. As for the contributions, we enhance that this is the first study with an empirical basis ever done in Portugal and that it allows us to alert the professional orders and institutions to improve the safeguard of independence mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Networks, Exchange Rate Fluctuation, and Economic Growth: ARDL Approach A Content Analysis on the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the United States of America Entrepreneurship and Income Inequality: A Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Analysis Ethics, Legal and Privacy Concerns for the Next Generation of Insurance Policies Brand management and internationalization: A case study in the sports equipment industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1