正宗品牌定位还是醒洗?LGBTQI+消费者对品牌行动主义的看法

Cassiano Tressoldi, Lélis Balestrin Espartel, S. Rohden
{"title":"正宗品牌定位还是醒洗?LGBTQI+消费者对品牌行动主义的看法","authors":"Cassiano Tressoldi, Lélis Balestrin Espartel, S. Rohden","doi":"10.1108/edi-05-2022-0126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex and others (LGBTQI+) movement has been the focus of companies that seek to win over consumers by supporting diversity. Any positioning, however, that is not perceived as being consistent and genuine can harm the brand's image. Through a queer theoretical perspective, the authors explore perceptions of LGBTQI+ consumers regarding brand activism.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research was carried out that involved interviewing Brazilian consumers who are part of the LGBTQI+ community.FindingsAspects of the identity of these individuals draw closer to those brands that share the same values the individuals have. Brand activism is perceived positively in terms of the brand's representativeness and social impact. When activism is perceived as inauthentic, activism generates a backlash and consumers begin to boycott brands as the consumers associate positioning with woke-washing practices.Originality/valueThe results indicate that to adopt an activist stance with regard to the LGBTQI+ public, brands need to be consistent in the brands' communication and advertising and in brands' organizational culture and diversity. This research provides important indicators for brands that genuinely want to support the LGBTQI+ community and is the first to use queer theory to analyze brand activism.","PeriodicalId":72949,"journal":{"name":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Authentic brand positioning or woke washing? LGBTQI+ consumer perceptions of brand activism\",\"authors\":\"Cassiano Tressoldi, Lélis Balestrin Espartel, S. Rohden\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/edi-05-2022-0126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex and others (LGBTQI+) movement has been the focus of companies that seek to win over consumers by supporting diversity. Any positioning, however, that is not perceived as being consistent and genuine can harm the brand's image. Through a queer theoretical perspective, the authors explore perceptions of LGBTQI+ consumers regarding brand activism.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research was carried out that involved interviewing Brazilian consumers who are part of the LGBTQI+ community.FindingsAspects of the identity of these individuals draw closer to those brands that share the same values the individuals have. Brand activism is perceived positively in terms of the brand's representativeness and social impact. When activism is perceived as inauthentic, activism generates a backlash and consumers begin to boycott brands as the consumers associate positioning with woke-washing practices.Originality/valueThe results indicate that to adopt an activist stance with regard to the LGBTQI+ public, brands need to be consistent in the brands' communication and advertising and in brands' organizational culture and diversity. This research provides important indicators for brands that genuinely want to support the LGBTQI+ community and is the first to use queer theory to analyze brand activism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-05-2022-0126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, diversity and inclusion : an international journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-05-2022-0126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿、双性人和其他(LGBTQI+)群体运动一直是企业通过支持多样性来赢得消费者的焦点。然而,任何不被认为是一致和真实的定位都会损害品牌形象。通过酷儿理论的视角,作者探讨了LGBTQI+消费者对品牌行动主义的看法。设计/方法/方法进行了定性研究,包括采访属于LGBTQI+社区的巴西消费者。这些人的身份特征与那些与他们拥有相同价值观的品牌越来越接近。就品牌的代表性和社会影响而言,品牌行动主义被认为是积极的。当行动主义被认为是不真实的,行动主义就会产生反弹,消费者开始抵制品牌,因为消费者将定位与洗衣服的做法联系在一起。独创性/价值研究结果表明,品牌要对LGBTQI+群体采取积极的立场,需要在品牌的传播和广告以及品牌的组织文化和多样性上保持一致。本研究为真正想要支持LGBTQI+群体的品牌提供了重要的指标,也是第一个用酷儿理论分析品牌行动主义的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Authentic brand positioning or woke washing? LGBTQI+ consumer perceptions of brand activism
PurposeThe lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex and others (LGBTQI+) movement has been the focus of companies that seek to win over consumers by supporting diversity. Any positioning, however, that is not perceived as being consistent and genuine can harm the brand's image. Through a queer theoretical perspective, the authors explore perceptions of LGBTQI+ consumers regarding brand activism.Design/methodology/approachQualitative research was carried out that involved interviewing Brazilian consumers who are part of the LGBTQI+ community.FindingsAspects of the identity of these individuals draw closer to those brands that share the same values the individuals have. Brand activism is perceived positively in terms of the brand's representativeness and social impact. When activism is perceived as inauthentic, activism generates a backlash and consumers begin to boycott brands as the consumers associate positioning with woke-washing practices.Originality/valueThe results indicate that to adopt an activist stance with regard to the LGBTQI+ public, brands need to be consistent in the brands' communication and advertising and in brands' organizational culture and diversity. This research provides important indicators for brands that genuinely want to support the LGBTQI+ community and is the first to use queer theory to analyze brand activism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The future of work in shaping the employment inclusion of young adults with disabilities: a qualitative study. Who gets to choose: a global perspective on gender, work and choice in the post-pandemic workplace What is there to be happy about? The impact of race and resilience in the United States A key to recovery for working mothers? Psychological detachment and the roles of relaxation, mastery and control on boundary violations Investigating the gender pay gap in the Maltese financial and insurance sector: a macro and micro approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1