对《全球创业观察》国家专家调查数据的批判性评估

IF 7.8 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1177/10422587221134928

C. A. Rietveld, Pankaj C. Patel

{"title":"对《全球创业观察》国家专家调查数据的批判性评估","authors":"C. A. Rietveld, Pankaj C. Patel","doi":"10.1177/10422587221134928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data collected through the National Expert Survey (NES) of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) are widely used to benchmark and assess the quality and impact of national entrepreneurial ecosystems. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the publicly available NES data, we show that the construct validity of the survey is not sufficient and that the experts differ so greatly in their evaluations of the entrepreneurial framework conditions (EFCs) in a country that meaningful cross-country and within-country (longitudinal) analyses are precluded. We conclude that the currently available NES data are not suited for motivating policy decisions.","PeriodicalId":48443,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Assessment of the National Expert Survey Data of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Rietveld, Pankaj C. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10422587221134928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data collected through the National Expert Survey (NES) of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) are widely used to benchmark and assess the quality and impact of national entrepreneurial ecosystems. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the publicly available NES data, we show that the construct validity of the survey is not sufficient and that the experts differ so greatly in their evaluations of the entrepreneurial framework conditions (EFCs) in a country that meaningful cross-country and within-country (longitudinal) analyses are precluded. We conclude that the currently available NES data are not suited for motivating policy decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221134928\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221134928","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

通过全球创业监测(GEM)的国家专家调查(NES)收集的数据被广泛用于基准和评估国家创业生态系统的质量和影响。基于对公开可用的NES数据的综合分析，我们表明调查的结构效度是不够的，专家们对一个国家的创业框架条件(EFCs)的评估差异很大，以至于排除了有意义的跨国和国内(纵向)分析。我们的结论是，目前可用的NES数据不适合激励政策决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

A Critical Assessment of the National Expert Survey Data of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor

Data collected through the National Expert Survey (NES) of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) are widely used to benchmark and assess the quality and impact of national entrepreneurial ecosystems. Based on a comprehensive analysis of the publicly available NES data, we show that the construct validity of the survey is not sufficient and that the experts differ so greatly in their evaluations of the entrepreneurial framework conditions (EFCs) in a country that meaningful cross-country and within-country (longitudinal) analyses are precluded. We conclude that the currently available NES data are not suited for motivating policy decisions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice BUSINESS-

CiteScore

19.00

自引率

12.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (ETP) is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal dedicated to conceptual and empirical research that advances, tests, or extends theory relating to entrepreneurship in its broadest sense. Article Topics: Topics covered in ETP include, but are not limited to: New Venture Creation, Development, Growth, and Performance Characteristics, Behaviors, and Types of Entrepreneurs Small Business Management Family-Owned Businesses Corporate, Social, and Sustainable Entrepreneurship National and International Studies of Enterprise Creation Research Methods in Entrepreneurship Venture Financing Content: The journal publishes articles that explore these topics through rigorous theoretical development, empirical analysis, and methodological innovation. ETP serves as a platform for advancing our understanding of entrepreneurship and its implications for individuals, organizations, and society.