葡萄糖酸氯己定与聚维酮碘用于手部卫生消毒的杀菌活性评价

T. Akamatsu, K. Tabata, M. Hironaga, M. Uyeda
{"title":"葡萄糖酸氯己定与聚维酮碘用于手部卫生消毒的杀菌活性评价","authors":"T. Akamatsu, K. Tabata, M. Hironaga, M. Uyeda","doi":"10.1248/JHS1956.41.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the aim of revaluating short-time hygienic hand disinfection in general wards, the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and povidone-iodine (PVI) was studied using the glove-juice procedure. In addition, the in vitro bactericidal activity of these antiseptics against 9 different bacterial strains was studied. Test groups of volunteers who disinfected their hands in a basin containing an aqueous solution of either 0.2% CHG or 0.2% PVI showed significantly inferior disinfection efficacy when compared to test groups which applied detergent solutions containing 4% CHG or 7.5% PVI directly onto their palms, scrubbed their hands, and washed the disinfectant away with running water, or to test groups which disinfected their hands by rubbing them with 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol or 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol. In addition, for the test groups which used CHG preparations (4% CHG in detergent, 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous CHG), the disinfection efficacy was maintained, even at 90 min after disinfection, as well as immediately after disinfection. However, for the test groups which used PVI preparations (7.5% PVI in detergent, 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous PVI), the disinfection efficacy at 90 min after disinfection was distinctly reduced. Furthermore, it became evident from the results of the in vitro bactericidal activity study that, compared to CHG, the bactericidal efficacy of PVI is reduced to a large extent in the presence of organic matter. These study results showed that the efficacy of CHG is superior to PVI, even in short-time hygienic hand disinfection.","PeriodicalId":14851,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health","volume":"53 1","pages":"419-425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone-Iodine for Hygienic Hand Disinfection\",\"authors\":\"T. Akamatsu, K. Tabata, M. Hironaga, M. Uyeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1248/JHS1956.41.419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the aim of revaluating short-time hygienic hand disinfection in general wards, the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and povidone-iodine (PVI) was studied using the glove-juice procedure. In addition, the in vitro bactericidal activity of these antiseptics against 9 different bacterial strains was studied. Test groups of volunteers who disinfected their hands in a basin containing an aqueous solution of either 0.2% CHG or 0.2% PVI showed significantly inferior disinfection efficacy when compared to test groups which applied detergent solutions containing 4% CHG or 7.5% PVI directly onto their palms, scrubbed their hands, and washed the disinfectant away with running water, or to test groups which disinfected their hands by rubbing them with 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol or 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol. In addition, for the test groups which used CHG preparations (4% CHG in detergent, 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous CHG), the disinfection efficacy was maintained, even at 90 min after disinfection, as well as immediately after disinfection. However, for the test groups which used PVI preparations (7.5% PVI in detergent, 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous PVI), the disinfection efficacy at 90 min after disinfection was distinctly reduced. Furthermore, it became evident from the results of the in vitro bactericidal activity study that, compared to CHG, the bactericidal efficacy of PVI is reduced to a large extent in the presence of organic matter. These study results showed that the efficacy of CHG is superior to PVI, even in short-time hygienic hand disinfection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"419-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1248/JHS1956.41.419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of toxicology and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/JHS1956.41.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了重新评价普通病房短时间卫生手部消毒效果,采用手套液法对葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)和聚维酮碘(PVI)的消毒效果进行了研究。此外,还研究了这些防腐剂对9种不同菌株的体外杀菌活性。与将含有4% CHG或7.5% PVI的洗涤剂溶液直接涂在手掌上,洗手并用自来水冲洗掉消毒剂的试验组相比,在含有0.2% CHG或0.2% PVI的水溶液的盆中洗手的试验组的消毒效果明显不如用0.2% CHG和80%乙醇或0.5% PVI和80%乙醇摩擦双手消毒的试验组。此外,对于使用CHG制剂(4% CHG洗涤剂,0.2% CHG 80%乙醇或0.2% CHG水溶液)的试验组,消毒后90分钟和消毒后立即保持消毒效果。然而,对于使用PVI制剂的试验组(洗涤剂中含7.5% PVI, 80%乙醇中含0.5% PVI,或0.2%水溶液PVI),消毒后90 min的消毒效果明显降低。此外,从体外杀菌活性研究的结果可以明显看出,与CHG相比,PVI在有机物存在下的杀菌效果在很大程度上降低。这些研究结果表明,即使在短时间的卫生手部消毒中,CHG的效果也优于PVI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone-Iodine for Hygienic Hand Disinfection
With the aim of revaluating short-time hygienic hand disinfection in general wards, the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and povidone-iodine (PVI) was studied using the glove-juice procedure. In addition, the in vitro bactericidal activity of these antiseptics against 9 different bacterial strains was studied. Test groups of volunteers who disinfected their hands in a basin containing an aqueous solution of either 0.2% CHG or 0.2% PVI showed significantly inferior disinfection efficacy when compared to test groups which applied detergent solutions containing 4% CHG or 7.5% PVI directly onto their palms, scrubbed their hands, and washed the disinfectant away with running water, or to test groups which disinfected their hands by rubbing them with 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol or 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol. In addition, for the test groups which used CHG preparations (4% CHG in detergent, 0.2% CHG in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous CHG), the disinfection efficacy was maintained, even at 90 min after disinfection, as well as immediately after disinfection. However, for the test groups which used PVI preparations (7.5% PVI in detergent, 0.5% PVI in 80% ethanol, or 0.2% aqueous PVI), the disinfection efficacy at 90 min after disinfection was distinctly reduced. Furthermore, it became evident from the results of the in vitro bactericidal activity study that, compared to CHG, the bactericidal efficacy of PVI is reduced to a large extent in the presence of organic matter. These study results showed that the efficacy of CHG is superior to PVI, even in short-time hygienic hand disinfection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELECTIVE AND SIMPLE QUANTIFICATION OF METALLOTHIONEIN III IN MOUSE BRAIN METALLOTHIONEIN INDUCTION IN RAT BRAIN AFTER INTRASTRIATAL INJECTION OF ZINC AND CADMIUM SALTS Studies on Photochemical Behaviors of Pesticides in Environment. Oil Spill Accident in the Sea of Japan Identification of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons of the Particulate Accumulated in the Tunnel Duct of Freeway and Generation of Their Oxygenated Derivatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1