农业的多元性、农业的同一性及其与农户阶级定位问题的关系

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.12658/m0667
A. Sönmez
{"title":"农业的多元性、农业的同一性及其与农户阶级定位问题的关系","authors":"A. Sönmez","doi":"10.12658/m0667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a methodological one, addressing the issue of how to deal with questions of identity, of farming, and its relation to the class locations of households engaged in farming and off-farm employment concurrently, which is usually called “pluriactivity”. The paper first examines and assesses why and how this problem arises out of different abstract conceptions of class, the social-class-identities of productive activities, the occupational identities of individuals and how the household boundaries are drawn in empirical research. Next, the paper makes suggestions for how to overcome these problems by paying attention to the problem of emergence, that is, how to describe and decide the very unity and identity that several income generating activities and forms of employment bring about concerning the class location of individuals and households. The leading argument of this essay is that the same or similar types of activities or types of employment derive their identity not from within themselves as separate entities but from the larger scheme of material, social or cultural objectives which the individuals and households, acting on the principle of “we-intentionality”, try to achieve by using their labour and resources as instruments.","PeriodicalId":53769,"journal":{"name":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pluriactivity, Identity of Farming and Their Relation to the Question of Class Location of Farming Households\",\"authors\":\"A. Sönmez\",\"doi\":\"10.12658/m0667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a methodological one, addressing the issue of how to deal with questions of identity, of farming, and its relation to the class locations of households engaged in farming and off-farm employment concurrently, which is usually called “pluriactivity”. The paper first examines and assesses why and how this problem arises out of different abstract conceptions of class, the social-class-identities of productive activities, the occupational identities of individuals and how the household boundaries are drawn in empirical research. Next, the paper makes suggestions for how to overcome these problems by paying attention to the problem of emergence, that is, how to describe and decide the very unity and identity that several income generating activities and forms of employment bring about concerning the class location of individuals and households. The leading argument of this essay is that the same or similar types of activities or types of employment derive their identity not from within themselves as separate entities but from the larger scheme of material, social or cultural objectives which the individuals and households, acting on the principle of “we-intentionality”, try to achieve by using their labour and resources as instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0667\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12658/m0667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是一篇方法论论文,探讨了如何处理身份问题,农业问题,以及它与同时从事农业和非农就业的家庭的阶级位置的关系,这通常被称为“多元活动”。本文首先从不同的抽象阶级概念、生产活动的社会阶级认同、个人的职业认同以及实证研究中如何划定家庭界限等方面考察和评估了这一问题产生的原因和方式。其次,本文通过关注涌现问题提出了如何克服这些问题的建议,即如何描述和确定几种创收活动和就业形式所带来的关于个人和家庭阶级定位的统一性和同一性。本文的主要论点是,相同或相似类型的活动或就业类型的身份不是来自他们作为独立实体的内部,而是来自更大的物质、社会或文化目标计划,这些目标是个人和家庭根据“我们-意向性”原则,试图通过使用他们的劳动和资源作为工具来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pluriactivity, Identity of Farming and Their Relation to the Question of Class Location of Farming Households
This paper is a methodological one, addressing the issue of how to deal with questions of identity, of farming, and its relation to the class locations of households engaged in farming and off-farm employment concurrently, which is usually called “pluriactivity”. The paper first examines and assesses why and how this problem arises out of different abstract conceptions of class, the social-class-identities of productive activities, the occupational identities of individuals and how the household boundaries are drawn in empirical research. Next, the paper makes suggestions for how to overcome these problems by paying attention to the problem of emergence, that is, how to describe and decide the very unity and identity that several income generating activities and forms of employment bring about concerning the class location of individuals and households. The leading argument of this essay is that the same or similar types of activities or types of employment derive their identity not from within themselves as separate entities but from the larger scheme of material, social or cultural objectives which the individuals and households, acting on the principle of “we-intentionality”, try to achieve by using their labour and resources as instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society
Insan & Toplum-The Journal of Humanity & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
LGBT Hareketin Gelişimi, Kurumsallaşması ve Batı Medeniyet Projesine Dönüşümü İslam Can & Ejder Ulutaş, Teşhir Toplumu: Bir Duyu Sosyolojisi Denemesi, Ketebe Yayınları, 2021, 188 s. Martha C. Nussbaum, Her Şey Çıkar İçin mi? Demokrasi İnsanlığa Neden İhtiyaç Duyuyor? İrem Sağlamer (Çev.), Sander Yayınları, 2022, 184 s. M. Sami Okumuş, Tarihin Televizyonla İhyası: TRT Tarihi ve Dizi Filmler (1974-2020). Dergâh Yayınları, 2021, 306 s. Hezbollah’s Diversionary War in Lebanon: Continuity and Change in the Threat Perception
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1