静脉注射芬太尼预防桡动脉介入治疗中桡动脉痉挛的作用

Partha Pratim Saha, A. Choudhury, S. Ahsan, A. Momen, S. R. Patwary, N. Alam, Kofil Uddin, Pritha Sarkar, Heru Al Amin
{"title":"静脉注射芬太尼预防桡动脉介入治疗中桡动脉痉挛的作用","authors":"Partha Pratim Saha, A. Choudhury, S. Ahsan, A. Momen, S. R. Patwary, N. Alam, Kofil Uddin, Pritha Sarkar, Heru Al Amin","doi":"10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radial artery spasm (RAS), one of the commonest complications in trans radial cardiac intervention, leads a variety range of adverse events. Different prevention strategies had been introduced and the use of sedation is one of them. Use of Fentanyl is common in cardiac interventions to achieve sedation and analgesia and also offers a potent vasodilatory effect. Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of fentanyl in the prevention of RAS in trans radial intervention. \nMethods: This observational analytic study was conducted in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) for a period of 1 year following approval of the protocol in the total of 260 patients who underwent coronary intervention through trans radial approach (Coronary Angiogram and or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). They were categorized in 2 group- group I patients received intravenous fentanyl and group II patients didn’t receive fentanyl. Besides this, each patient received all treatments according to standard protocol of NICVD. RAS was identified by subjective and objective evidence. Patient is discomfort was quantified with a visual analogue scale. \nResults: The frequency of RAS was 17.70% in group I versus 30.80% in group II (p =0.014). Intravenous use of fentanyl significantly reduced radial artery spasm (p< 0.05). Bivariate logistic regression analysis showed use of fentanyl had lower odds to prevent radial artery spasm (odds ratio [OR]: 0.430, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.239 to 0.779). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of spasm was 8. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed use of fentanyl was the strong predictor of RAS ([OR]: 0.370; 95% [CI]: .195-.703) as well as use of reprocessed sheath, smoking, catheter diameter 6Fr and visual analogue scale (VAS) Score during cannulation became independent predictaor of RAS. Patient discomfort in VAS score was 4.75±2.70 in Group I versus 5.33±2.64 in group II (p< 0 .05). \nConclusion: In this study, use of fentanyl reduced the frequency of radial artery spasm and the procedure related level of patient discomfort. \nUniversity Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 54-60","PeriodicalId":23424,"journal":{"name":"University Heart Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl to Prevent Radial Artery Spasm During Trans Radial Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Partha Pratim Saha, A. Choudhury, S. Ahsan, A. Momen, S. R. Patwary, N. Alam, Kofil Uddin, Pritha Sarkar, Heru Al Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Radial artery spasm (RAS), one of the commonest complications in trans radial cardiac intervention, leads a variety range of adverse events. Different prevention strategies had been introduced and the use of sedation is one of them. Use of Fentanyl is common in cardiac interventions to achieve sedation and analgesia and also offers a potent vasodilatory effect. Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of fentanyl in the prevention of RAS in trans radial intervention. \\nMethods: This observational analytic study was conducted in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) for a period of 1 year following approval of the protocol in the total of 260 patients who underwent coronary intervention through trans radial approach (Coronary Angiogram and or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). They were categorized in 2 group- group I patients received intravenous fentanyl and group II patients didn’t receive fentanyl. Besides this, each patient received all treatments according to standard protocol of NICVD. RAS was identified by subjective and objective evidence. Patient is discomfort was quantified with a visual analogue scale. \\nResults: The frequency of RAS was 17.70% in group I versus 30.80% in group II (p =0.014). Intravenous use of fentanyl significantly reduced radial artery spasm (p< 0.05). Bivariate logistic regression analysis showed use of fentanyl had lower odds to prevent radial artery spasm (odds ratio [OR]: 0.430, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.239 to 0.779). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of spasm was 8. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed use of fentanyl was the strong predictor of RAS ([OR]: 0.370; 95% [CI]: .195-.703) as well as use of reprocessed sheath, smoking, catheter diameter 6Fr and visual analogue scale (VAS) Score during cannulation became independent predictaor of RAS. Patient discomfort in VAS score was 4.75±2.70 in Group I versus 5.33±2.64 in group II (p< 0 .05). \\nConclusion: In this study, use of fentanyl reduced the frequency of radial artery spasm and the procedure related level of patient discomfort. \\nUniversity Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 54-60\",\"PeriodicalId\":23424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/uhj.v18i1.57881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:桡动脉痉挛(RAS)是经桡动脉心脏介入治疗中最常见的并发症之一,可导致一系列不良事件。采用了不同的预防策略,镇静的使用是其中之一。使用芬太尼是常见的心脏干预,以实现镇静和镇痛,也提供了一个有效的血管扩张作用。目的:探讨芬太尼在经桡动脉介入治疗中预防RAS的作用。方法:这项观察性分析研究是在国家心血管疾病研究所(NICVD)进行的,为期1年,共260例通过经桡动脉入路(冠状动脉造影和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。将患者分为两组,第一组患者静脉注射芬太尼,第二组患者不注射芬太尼。除此之外,每位患者均按照NICVD的标准方案接受了所有治疗。通过主客观证据对RAS进行鉴定。用视觉模拟量表量化患者的不适程度。结果:RAS发生率I组为17.70%,II组为30.80% (p =0.014)。静脉注射芬太尼可显著减少桡动脉痉挛(p< 0.05)。双变量logistic回归分析显示,使用芬太尼预防桡动脉痉挛的几率较低(优势比[OR]: 0.430, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.239 ~ 0.779)。避免1例痉挛需要治疗的次数为8次。多因素logistic回归分析也显示芬太尼的使用是RAS的强预测因子([OR]: 0.370;95% [CI]: 0.195 ~ 0.703)、使用再处理护套、吸烟、插管时导管直径6Fr和视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分成为RAS的独立预测指标。患者VAS不适评分I组为4.75±2.70分,II组为5.33±2.64分(p< 0.05)。结论:在本研究中,芬太尼的使用减少了桡动脉痉挛的频率和手术相关的患者不适程度。大学心脏杂志2022;18 (1): 54-60
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl to Prevent Radial Artery Spasm During Trans Radial Intervention
Background: Radial artery spasm (RAS), one of the commonest complications in trans radial cardiac intervention, leads a variety range of adverse events. Different prevention strategies had been introduced and the use of sedation is one of them. Use of Fentanyl is common in cardiac interventions to achieve sedation and analgesia and also offers a potent vasodilatory effect. Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of fentanyl in the prevention of RAS in trans radial intervention. Methods: This observational analytic study was conducted in National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD) for a period of 1 year following approval of the protocol in the total of 260 patients who underwent coronary intervention through trans radial approach (Coronary Angiogram and or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). They were categorized in 2 group- group I patients received intravenous fentanyl and group II patients didn’t receive fentanyl. Besides this, each patient received all treatments according to standard protocol of NICVD. RAS was identified by subjective and objective evidence. Patient is discomfort was quantified with a visual analogue scale. Results: The frequency of RAS was 17.70% in group I versus 30.80% in group II (p =0.014). Intravenous use of fentanyl significantly reduced radial artery spasm (p< 0.05). Bivariate logistic regression analysis showed use of fentanyl had lower odds to prevent radial artery spasm (odds ratio [OR]: 0.430, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.239 to 0.779). The number needed to treat to avoid 1 case of spasm was 8. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also revealed use of fentanyl was the strong predictor of RAS ([OR]: 0.370; 95% [CI]: .195-.703) as well as use of reprocessed sheath, smoking, catheter diameter 6Fr and visual analogue scale (VAS) Score during cannulation became independent predictaor of RAS. Patient discomfort in VAS score was 4.75±2.70 in Group I versus 5.33±2.64 in group II (p< 0 .05). Conclusion: In this study, use of fentanyl reduced the frequency of radial artery spasm and the procedure related level of patient discomfort. University Heart Journal 2022; 18(1): 54-60
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Cardiac Troponin I Levels with the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Awareness on MINOCA Minimally Invasive Ascending Aortic Replacement with Concomitant Aortic Valve Replacement, A Case Report The outcome of Autogenous Venous Graft Vs Prosthetic Graft in Peripheral Arterial Disease- Study in Bangladesh Correlation between the GRACE Risk Score and the SYNTAX Score in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1