监测社区指导的治疗方案以促进可持续性:来自非洲盘尾丝虫病控制规划的经验教训

U. Amazigo, Oka Obono, K. Dadzie, J. H. Remme, J. Jiya, R. Ndyomugyenyi, J. Roungou, M. Noma, A. Sékétéli
{"title":"监测社区指导的治疗方案以促进可持续性:来自非洲盘尾丝虫病控制规划的经验教训","authors":"U. Amazigo, Oka Obono, K. Dadzie, J. H. Remme, J. Jiya, R. Ndyomugyenyi, J. Roungou, M. Noma, A. Sékétéli","doi":"10.1179/000349802125000664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Community-directed treatment is a relatively new strategy that was adopted in 1997 by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), for large-scale distribution of ivermectin (Mectizan®). Participatory monitoring of 39 of the control projects based on community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) was undertaken from 1998–2000, with a focus on process implementation of the strategy and the predictors of sustainability. Data from 14,925 household interviews in 2314 villages, 183 complete treatment records, 382 focus-group discussions, and the results of interviews with 669 community leaders, 757 trained communitydirected drug distributors (CDD) and 146 health personnel (in 26 projects in four countries) were analysed. The data show that CDD dispensed ivermectin to 65.4% of the total population (71.2% of the eligible population), with no significant gender differences in coverage (P > 0.05). Treatment coverage ranged from 60.2% of the eligible subjects in Cameroon to 76.9% in Uganda. There was no significant relationship between the provision of incentives to CDD and treatment coverage (P > 0.05). The frequency of treatment refusal was highest in Cameroon (29.2%). Although most (72.1%) of the communities investigated selected their CDD on the basis of a community decision at a village meeting, only 37.9% chose their distribution period in the same way. There is clearly a need to improve communication strategies, to address the issues of absentees and refusals, to emphasise community ownership and to de-emphasise incentives for CDD. The investigation of the ‘predictor indicators’ of sustainability should enable APOC to understand the determinants of project performance and to initiate any appropriate changes in the programme.","PeriodicalId":8038,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"75","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring community-directed treatment programmes for sustainability: lessons from the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC)\",\"authors\":\"U. Amazigo, Oka Obono, K. Dadzie, J. H. Remme, J. Jiya, R. Ndyomugyenyi, J. Roungou, M. Noma, A. Sékétéli\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/000349802125000664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Community-directed treatment is a relatively new strategy that was adopted in 1997 by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), for large-scale distribution of ivermectin (Mectizan®). Participatory monitoring of 39 of the control projects based on community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) was undertaken from 1998–2000, with a focus on process implementation of the strategy and the predictors of sustainability. Data from 14,925 household interviews in 2314 villages, 183 complete treatment records, 382 focus-group discussions, and the results of interviews with 669 community leaders, 757 trained communitydirected drug distributors (CDD) and 146 health personnel (in 26 projects in four countries) were analysed. The data show that CDD dispensed ivermectin to 65.4% of the total population (71.2% of the eligible population), with no significant gender differences in coverage (P > 0.05). Treatment coverage ranged from 60.2% of the eligible subjects in Cameroon to 76.9% in Uganda. There was no significant relationship between the provision of incentives to CDD and treatment coverage (P > 0.05). The frequency of treatment refusal was highest in Cameroon (29.2%). Although most (72.1%) of the communities investigated selected their CDD on the basis of a community decision at a village meeting, only 37.9% chose their distribution period in the same way. There is clearly a need to improve communication strategies, to address the issues of absentees and refusals, to emphasise community ownership and to de-emphasise incentives for CDD. The investigation of the ‘predictor indicators’ of sustainability should enable APOC to understand the determinants of project performance and to initiate any appropriate changes in the programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"75\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/000349802125000664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Tropical Medicine & Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/000349802125000664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

摘要

社区指导治疗是1997年非洲盘尾丝虫病控制规划(APOC)为大规模分发伊维菌素(Mectizan®)而采用的一种相对较新的治疗策略。1998-2000年期间,对39个以伊维菌素社区指导治疗为基础的控制项目进行了参与性监测,重点关注战略的实施过程和可持续性预测因素。分析了来自2314个村庄的14,925个家庭访谈、183个完整的治疗记录、382个焦点小组讨论的数据,以及对669名社区领导人、757名经过培训的社区指导药物分发者(CDD)和146名卫生人员(在4个国家的26个项目中)的访谈结果。数据显示,CDD的伊维菌素配给率为65.4%,占符合条件人群的71.2%,性别差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗覆盖率从喀麦隆合格受试者的60.2%到乌干达的76.9%不等。CDD奖励与治疗覆盖率之间无显著关系(P > 0.05)。拒绝治疗的频率在喀麦隆最高(29.2%)。尽管大部分(72.1%)社区是根据村委会会议的决定来选择CDD的,但只有37.9%的社区是根据村委会会议的决定来选择分发时间的。显然有必要改进沟通策略,解决缺勤和拒绝的问题,强调社区的所有权,并减少对CDD的激励。对可持续性“预测指标”的调查应使项目协调会能够了解项目执行情况的决定因素,并着手对方案进行任何适当的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring community-directed treatment programmes for sustainability: lessons from the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC)
Abstract Community-directed treatment is a relatively new strategy that was adopted in 1997 by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC), for large-scale distribution of ivermectin (Mectizan®). Participatory monitoring of 39 of the control projects based on community-directed treatment with ivermectin (CDTI) was undertaken from 1998–2000, with a focus on process implementation of the strategy and the predictors of sustainability. Data from 14,925 household interviews in 2314 villages, 183 complete treatment records, 382 focus-group discussions, and the results of interviews with 669 community leaders, 757 trained communitydirected drug distributors (CDD) and 146 health personnel (in 26 projects in four countries) were analysed. The data show that CDD dispensed ivermectin to 65.4% of the total population (71.2% of the eligible population), with no significant gender differences in coverage (P > 0.05). Treatment coverage ranged from 60.2% of the eligible subjects in Cameroon to 76.9% in Uganda. There was no significant relationship between the provision of incentives to CDD and treatment coverage (P > 0.05). The frequency of treatment refusal was highest in Cameroon (29.2%). Although most (72.1%) of the communities investigated selected their CDD on the basis of a community decision at a village meeting, only 37.9% chose their distribution period in the same way. There is clearly a need to improve communication strategies, to address the issues of absentees and refusals, to emphasise community ownership and to de-emphasise incentives for CDD. The investigation of the ‘predictor indicators’ of sustainability should enable APOC to understand the determinants of project performance and to initiate any appropriate changes in the programme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mosquitoes and their Control A Realistic Strategy for Fighting Malaria in Africa Frontispiece — Dr Michael Chance George Stanley Nelson Dr Brian Coulter M.D., F.R.C.P.(I.), F.R.C.P.C.H.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1