{"title":"不同胎龄大鼠移植后肾细胞排斥反应与发育的关系","authors":"Jian Xu, Yahui Sun, Chunyue Xu, Yening Huang, Liang-jie Hong, F. Zeng","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the relationship between cellular rejection and the development of allo-or xenografted primordia from different gestational ages. \n \n \nMethods \nWhole rat metanephroi from embryonic day E14~E19 were transplanted into omenta of outbred (SD→SD, 6 groups, n≥10 each; E15-E17SDCsA, 3 groups, n=15 each), syngeneic (Lewis→Lewis, 5 groups, n=8 each), allogeneic (Lewis→BN, E15BN n=6 each E15BNCsA n=10 each, E16BNCsA n=10 each) rats and xenogeneic (Lewis→C57groups, E15C57 n=10 each, E15C57CsA, n=8 each; Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, 3 groups, n=10 each) recipients. Histopathology, Banff’s grading and electron microscopy (EM) were utilized for assessing the graft development. Similarly, biochemical indicators and creatinine clearances were measured. \n \n \nResults \nAt 4 weeks post-transplantation, in SD→SD groups, E14-E17SD metanephroi developed with Banff’s rejections. E14/E15SD was significantly lighter than E16/E17SD (P 0.05). E14Lewis and E18Lewis rats had significantly poorly differentiated metanephroi than those in E16 Lewis group. In Lewis→C57BL/6, E15 metanephroi were rejected at Day 14 post-transplantation (n=10) and no improvement was evident after CsA dosing (15 mg·kg-1·d-1, n=8). In Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, all E15~E17Balb/c metanephroi developed well. Both light microscopy and EM examination showed normal nephrons and collecting ducts and wet weight, creatinine or urea nitrogen of effusion showed no significant difference (P>0.05). E15Lewis and E16Lewis had significantly different values of wet weight and creatinine clearances from those of E15SDCsA and E16SDCsA. E15SDCsA had the greatest wet weight and the lowest creatinine clearance rate (P<0.01). \n \n \nConclusions \nAfter controlling rejection during allo-and xenotransplantations, E15, E16 and E17 rat metanephros have similar development characteristics. And cellular immunogenic factors still remain the major barriers to their developments. \n \n \nKey words: \nmetanephrogenic blastema; immunological rejection; immunosuppressant; organogenesis","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"25 1","pages":"369-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between cellular rejection and development of rat transplanted metanephroi from different gestational ages\",\"authors\":\"Jian Xu, Yahui Sun, Chunyue Xu, Yening Huang, Liang-jie Hong, F. Zeng\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the relationship between cellular rejection and the development of allo-or xenografted primordia from different gestational ages. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nWhole rat metanephroi from embryonic day E14~E19 were transplanted into omenta of outbred (SD→SD, 6 groups, n≥10 each; E15-E17SDCsA, 3 groups, n=15 each), syngeneic (Lewis→Lewis, 5 groups, n=8 each), allogeneic (Lewis→BN, E15BN n=6 each E15BNCsA n=10 each, E16BNCsA n=10 each) rats and xenogeneic (Lewis→C57groups, E15C57 n=10 each, E15C57CsA, n=8 each; Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, 3 groups, n=10 each) recipients. Histopathology, Banff’s grading and electron microscopy (EM) were utilized for assessing the graft development. Similarly, biochemical indicators and creatinine clearances were measured. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAt 4 weeks post-transplantation, in SD→SD groups, E14-E17SD metanephroi developed with Banff’s rejections. E14/E15SD was significantly lighter than E16/E17SD (P 0.05). E14Lewis and E18Lewis rats had significantly poorly differentiated metanephroi than those in E16 Lewis group. In Lewis→C57BL/6, E15 metanephroi were rejected at Day 14 post-transplantation (n=10) and no improvement was evident after CsA dosing (15 mg·kg-1·d-1, n=8). In Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, all E15~E17Balb/c metanephroi developed well. Both light microscopy and EM examination showed normal nephrons and collecting ducts and wet weight, creatinine or urea nitrogen of effusion showed no significant difference (P>0.05). E15Lewis and E16Lewis had significantly different values of wet weight and creatinine clearances from those of E15SDCsA and E16SDCsA. E15SDCsA had the greatest wet weight and the lowest creatinine clearance rate (P<0.01). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nAfter controlling rejection during allo-and xenotransplantations, E15, E16 and E17 rat metanephros have similar development characteristics. And cellular immunogenic factors still remain the major barriers to their developments. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nmetanephrogenic blastema; immunological rejection; immunosuppressant; organogenesis\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"369-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.06.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between cellular rejection and development of rat transplanted metanephroi from different gestational ages
Objective
To explore the relationship between cellular rejection and the development of allo-or xenografted primordia from different gestational ages.
Methods
Whole rat metanephroi from embryonic day E14~E19 were transplanted into omenta of outbred (SD→SD, 6 groups, n≥10 each; E15-E17SDCsA, 3 groups, n=15 each), syngeneic (Lewis→Lewis, 5 groups, n=8 each), allogeneic (Lewis→BN, E15BN n=6 each E15BNCsA n=10 each, E16BNCsA n=10 each) rats and xenogeneic (Lewis→C57groups, E15C57 n=10 each, E15C57CsA, n=8 each; Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, 3 groups, n=10 each) recipients. Histopathology, Banff’s grading and electron microscopy (EM) were utilized for assessing the graft development. Similarly, biochemical indicators and creatinine clearances were measured.
Results
At 4 weeks post-transplantation, in SD→SD groups, E14-E17SD metanephroi developed with Banff’s rejections. E14/E15SD was significantly lighter than E16/E17SD (P 0.05). E14Lewis and E18Lewis rats had significantly poorly differentiated metanephroi than those in E16 Lewis group. In Lewis→C57BL/6, E15 metanephroi were rejected at Day 14 post-transplantation (n=10) and no improvement was evident after CsA dosing (15 mg·kg-1·d-1, n=8). In Lewis→Balb/c nude mice, all E15~E17Balb/c metanephroi developed well. Both light microscopy and EM examination showed normal nephrons and collecting ducts and wet weight, creatinine or urea nitrogen of effusion showed no significant difference (P>0.05). E15Lewis and E16Lewis had significantly different values of wet weight and creatinine clearances from those of E15SDCsA and E16SDCsA. E15SDCsA had the greatest wet weight and the lowest creatinine clearance rate (P<0.01).
Conclusions
After controlling rejection during allo-and xenotransplantations, E15, E16 and E17 rat metanephros have similar development characteristics. And cellular immunogenic factors still remain the major barriers to their developments.
Key words:
metanephrogenic blastema; immunological rejection; immunosuppressant; organogenesis