相机辅助照度测量的联合验证研究

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Lighting Research & Technology Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1177/14771535231154169
F. Mahlab, H. Yamaguchi, Y. Shimozima, N. Yoshizawa, H. Cai
{"title":"相机辅助照度测量的联合验证研究","authors":"F. Mahlab, H. Yamaguchi, Y. Shimozima, N. Yoshizawa, H. Cai","doi":"10.1177/14771535231154169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This joint study conducted in the United States and Japan reviewed existing illuminance measurement methods that use a conventional digital single-lens reflex camera, including (a) per-pixel illuminance calculation using non-fisheye wide-angle lenses, (b) hemispherical projection-based illuminance calculation, (c) the KU method developed by the University of Kansas (KU) and (d) the L-CEPT method developed by the Japanese team for per-pixel illuminance calculation using 180° fisheye lens. Next, laboratory and field measurements were conducted in 32 test scenarios in Kansas and Japan to improve and validate the two similar methods (c) and (d) for per-pixel illuminance calculation and compare them to the simplified method (b) using orthographic projection-based illuminance calculation. Based on the test results, the camera-aided illuminance measurement method could have an error rate of 13.7% ± 15.3% (SD) in all 32 scenarios. Large errors (>25%) were observed in six extremely dynamic gymnasiums with rapidly changing morning sunlight. Alternatively, an average error rate of 7.7% ± 7.5% was observed in the 26 test scenarios without rapidly changing direct sunlight. The simplified orthographic projection-based method could achieve the same level of accuracy as the per-pixel KU/L-CEPT method. Yet, multiple issues on camera-aided illuminance measurement still need further investigation.","PeriodicalId":18133,"journal":{"name":"Lighting Research & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A joint validation study on camera-aided illuminance measurement\",\"authors\":\"F. Mahlab, H. Yamaguchi, Y. Shimozima, N. Yoshizawa, H. Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14771535231154169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This joint study conducted in the United States and Japan reviewed existing illuminance measurement methods that use a conventional digital single-lens reflex camera, including (a) per-pixel illuminance calculation using non-fisheye wide-angle lenses, (b) hemispherical projection-based illuminance calculation, (c) the KU method developed by the University of Kansas (KU) and (d) the L-CEPT method developed by the Japanese team for per-pixel illuminance calculation using 180° fisheye lens. Next, laboratory and field measurements were conducted in 32 test scenarios in Kansas and Japan to improve and validate the two similar methods (c) and (d) for per-pixel illuminance calculation and compare them to the simplified method (b) using orthographic projection-based illuminance calculation. Based on the test results, the camera-aided illuminance measurement method could have an error rate of 13.7% ± 15.3% (SD) in all 32 scenarios. Large errors (>25%) were observed in six extremely dynamic gymnasiums with rapidly changing morning sunlight. Alternatively, an average error rate of 7.7% ± 7.5% was observed in the 26 test scenarios without rapidly changing direct sunlight. The simplified orthographic projection-based method could achieve the same level of accuracy as the per-pixel KU/L-CEPT method. Yet, multiple issues on camera-aided illuminance measurement still need further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lighting Research & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lighting Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535231154169\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lighting Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535231154169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项在美国和日本进行的联合研究回顾了现有的使用传统数字单镜头反光相机的照度测量方法,包括(a)使用非鱼眼广角镜头的每像素照度计算,(b)基于半球面投影的照度计算,(c)堪萨斯大学(KU)开发的KU方法和(d)日本团队开发的使用180°鱼眼镜头的每像素照度计算的L-CEPT方法。接下来,在堪萨斯州和日本的32个测试场景中进行了实验室和现场测量,以改进和验证两种相似的逐像素照度计算方法(c)和(d),并将其与基于正射影的照度计算简化方法(b)进行比较。测试结果表明,在所有32种场景下,摄像机辅助照度测量方法的误差率为13.7%±15.3% (SD)。在6个极具活力且晨光变化迅速的体育馆中观测到较大的误差(>25%)。在没有快速变化的直射阳光的情况下,26个测试场景的平均错误率为7.7%±7.5%。基于简化正射影的方法可以达到与逐像素KU/L-CEPT方法相同的精度水平。然而,在相机辅助照度测量方面还有许多问题需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A joint validation study on camera-aided illuminance measurement
This joint study conducted in the United States and Japan reviewed existing illuminance measurement methods that use a conventional digital single-lens reflex camera, including (a) per-pixel illuminance calculation using non-fisheye wide-angle lenses, (b) hemispherical projection-based illuminance calculation, (c) the KU method developed by the University of Kansas (KU) and (d) the L-CEPT method developed by the Japanese team for per-pixel illuminance calculation using 180° fisheye lens. Next, laboratory and field measurements were conducted in 32 test scenarios in Kansas and Japan to improve and validate the two similar methods (c) and (d) for per-pixel illuminance calculation and compare them to the simplified method (b) using orthographic projection-based illuminance calculation. Based on the test results, the camera-aided illuminance measurement method could have an error rate of 13.7% ± 15.3% (SD) in all 32 scenarios. Large errors (>25%) were observed in six extremely dynamic gymnasiums with rapidly changing morning sunlight. Alternatively, an average error rate of 7.7% ± 7.5% was observed in the 26 test scenarios without rapidly changing direct sunlight. The simplified orthographic projection-based method could achieve the same level of accuracy as the per-pixel KU/L-CEPT method. Yet, multiple issues on camera-aided illuminance measurement still need further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lighting Research & Technology
Lighting Research & Technology 工程技术-光学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lighting Research & Technology (LR&T) publishes original peer-reviewed research on all aspects of light and lighting and is published in association with The Society of Light and Lighting. LR&T covers the human response to light, the science of light generation, light control and measurement plus lighting design for both interior and exterior environments, as well as daylighting, energy efficiency and sustainability
期刊最新文献
Design, analysis and validation of Customised Homocentric Fresnel Collector based on longest wavelength of visible spectrum Visual and non-visual responses of drivers to simulated LED headlights varying in correlated colour temperature Life cycle cost analysis of LED retrofit and luminaire replacements for four-foot T8 troffers Editorial: Special issue for early career researchers in lighting Opinion: How to foster a motivating ecosystem for our next generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1