为什么儿童易受暗示仍然是一个严重的问题

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Contemporary Problems Pub Date : 2002-01-01 DOI:10.2307/1192368
Amye Warren, D. Marsil
{"title":"为什么儿童易受暗示仍然是一个严重的问题","authors":"Amye Warren, D. Marsil","doi":"10.2307/1192368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Amye R. Warren (*) Dorothy F. Marsil (**) I INTRODUCTION After more than two decades of continuous contemporary research on the child as a witness in legal proceedings, a great deal is known about children's eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Excellent reviews of this research are available, (1) and their summaries and conclusions will not be reiterated here. Instead, this article will focus on six areas representing some of the most intractable problems that will require further attention from scientists and practitioners alike. This list of issues is selective and somewhat idiosyncratic, but should serve to illustrate why the current understanding of children's suggestibility is far from complete. Research on each issue will be highlighted, concentrating primarily on studies published or presented in the past ten years. II Six REMAINING ISSUES A. Suggestibility is Not Limited to Preschool Children In the past ten years, research on children's capacities as witnesses has focused heavily on preschoolers, (2) who are disproportionately susceptible to suggestion. (3) The focus on preschoolers was based on both applied and theoretical grounds. For example, investigations in the McMartin Preschool case (4) and State v. Michaels (5) featured particularly problematic interviews with large numbers of very young children in day-care settings. Knowledge of cognitive development principles led child witness researchers to predict that preschoolers' relative cognitive limitations could lead to greater susceptibility to suggestive influences and, in turn, to a variety of problems for their interviewers. For example, Nancy Perry and her colleagues demonstrated that preschoolers have difficulty determining whether they really understand complex questions and frequently inaccurately answer questions that they do not understand. (6) Although the research attention devoted to preschoolers was certainly warranted, it has led to a relative neglect of the equally important population of older children. This trend, however, appears to be changing. In recent studies, researchers are increasingly including older children. (7) The findings indicate that suggestibility generally declines over the school years but that even adolescents can be significantly more suggestible than adults. (8) On the other hand, some studies demonstrate that, under certain conditions, older children and adults can be more suggestible than younger children. (9) The following sections briefly review six studies that included children older than preschoolers. Jennifer Ackil and Maria Zaragoza examined the suggestibility of first graders, third graders, fifth graders, and college students. (10) The subjects viewed a brief video and then heard an experimenter read a summary of the video that included some misleading information. (11) Either immediately afterwards or one week later, participants were given memory tests. (12) Evidence of suggestibility was found for all age groups, but first graders were more susceptible to suggestion than third and fifth graders, who were in turn more susceptible to suggestion than college students. (13) Essentially, the same pattern of age differences was found in the proportion of the suggested items that participants claimed to have actually seen in the video, as opposed to remembering from the summary. (14) Julie Robinson and Pamela Briggs also showed a film to their participants, who were four- to five-year-olds, eight- to nine-year-olds, and adults. (15) They then asked a series of questions, some of which were misleading. (16) A day later, they asked another set of questions. (17) In terms of correct answers to misleading questions, the youngest children's performance was poorer than that of eight- to nine-year-olds and adults. The latter two groups, however, did not significantly differ. (18) In contrast, when suggested answers to misleading questions were examined separately, the study showed that both age groups of children were more suggestible than adults, but that the children did not differ from one another. …","PeriodicalId":39484,"journal":{"name":"Law and Contemporary Problems","volume":"199 1","pages":"127-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Children’s Suggestibility Remains a Serious Concern\",\"authors\":\"Amye Warren, D. Marsil\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1192368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Amye R. Warren (*) Dorothy F. Marsil (**) I INTRODUCTION After more than two decades of continuous contemporary research on the child as a witness in legal proceedings, a great deal is known about children's eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Excellent reviews of this research are available, (1) and their summaries and conclusions will not be reiterated here. Instead, this article will focus on six areas representing some of the most intractable problems that will require further attention from scientists and practitioners alike. This list of issues is selective and somewhat idiosyncratic, but should serve to illustrate why the current understanding of children's suggestibility is far from complete. Research on each issue will be highlighted, concentrating primarily on studies published or presented in the past ten years. II Six REMAINING ISSUES A. Suggestibility is Not Limited to Preschool Children In the past ten years, research on children's capacities as witnesses has focused heavily on preschoolers, (2) who are disproportionately susceptible to suggestion. (3) The focus on preschoolers was based on both applied and theoretical grounds. For example, investigations in the McMartin Preschool case (4) and State v. Michaels (5) featured particularly problematic interviews with large numbers of very young children in day-care settings. Knowledge of cognitive development principles led child witness researchers to predict that preschoolers' relative cognitive limitations could lead to greater susceptibility to suggestive influences and, in turn, to a variety of problems for their interviewers. For example, Nancy Perry and her colleagues demonstrated that preschoolers have difficulty determining whether they really understand complex questions and frequently inaccurately answer questions that they do not understand. (6) Although the research attention devoted to preschoolers was certainly warranted, it has led to a relative neglect of the equally important population of older children. This trend, however, appears to be changing. In recent studies, researchers are increasingly including older children. (7) The findings indicate that suggestibility generally declines over the school years but that even adolescents can be significantly more suggestible than adults. (8) On the other hand, some studies demonstrate that, under certain conditions, older children and adults can be more suggestible than younger children. (9) The following sections briefly review six studies that included children older than preschoolers. Jennifer Ackil and Maria Zaragoza examined the suggestibility of first graders, third graders, fifth graders, and college students. (10) The subjects viewed a brief video and then heard an experimenter read a summary of the video that included some misleading information. (11) Either immediately afterwards or one week later, participants were given memory tests. (12) Evidence of suggestibility was found for all age groups, but first graders were more susceptible to suggestion than third and fifth graders, who were in turn more susceptible to suggestion than college students. (13) Essentially, the same pattern of age differences was found in the proportion of the suggested items that participants claimed to have actually seen in the video, as opposed to remembering from the summary. (14) Julie Robinson and Pamela Briggs also showed a film to their participants, who were four- to five-year-olds, eight- to nine-year-olds, and adults. (15) They then asked a series of questions, some of which were misleading. (16) A day later, they asked another set of questions. (17) In terms of correct answers to misleading questions, the youngest children's performance was poorer than that of eight- to nine-year-olds and adults. The latter two groups, however, did not significantly differ. (18) In contrast, when suggested answers to misleading questions were examined separately, the study showed that both age groups of children were more suggestible than adults, but that the children did not differ from one another. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":39484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"volume\":\"199 1\",\"pages\":\"127-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1192368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Contemporary Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1192368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

经过二十多年来对儿童在法律诉讼中作为证人的持续研究,人们对儿童的目击记忆和易受暗示性有了很多了解。这项研究的优秀评论是可用的(1),他们的总结和结论在这里不再重复。相反,本文将集中讨论六个领域,这些领域代表了一些最棘手的问题,这些问题需要科学家和实践者的进一步关注。这张问题清单是有选择性的,有些特殊,但应该有助于说明为什么目前对儿童易受暗示的理解还远远不够完整。将重点介绍对每个问题的研究,主要集中在过去十年中发表或提出的研究。A.易受暗示并不仅限于学龄前儿童在过去的十年中,关于儿童作为证人能力的研究主要集中在学龄前儿童身上,(2)他们特别容易受到暗示的影响。(3)对学龄前儿童的关注既有实践依据,也有理论依据。例如,在麦克马丁学前班案(4)和州诉迈克尔斯案(5)的调查中,对大量日托机构中非常年幼的儿童进行了特别有问题的采访。认知发展原则的知识使儿童目击研究人员预测,学龄前儿童的相对认知限制可能导致他们更容易受到暗示性影响,进而给他们的采访者带来各种各样的问题。例如,Nancy Perry和她的同事证明,学龄前儿童很难确定他们是否真的理解了复杂的问题,并且经常错误地回答他们不理解的问题。(6)尽管对学龄前儿童的研究关注是理所当然的,但这导致了对同样重要的年龄较大的儿童的相对忽视。然而,这一趋势似乎正在改变。在最近的研究中,研究人员越来越多地将年龄较大的儿童纳入研究对象。(7)研究结果表明,易受暗示的程度在上学期间普遍下降,但即使是青少年也可能明显比成年人更容易受暗示。(8)另一方面,一些研究表明,在某些条件下,年龄较大的儿童和成人可能比年幼的儿童更容易受暗示。(9)以下部分简要回顾了六项研究,其中包括学龄前儿童。Jennifer Ackil和Maria Zaragoza研究了一年级、三年级、五年级和大学生的易受暗示性。(10)受试者观看一段简短的视频,然后听一名实验者朗读视频摘要,其中包含一些误导性信息。随后或一周后,参与者进行了记忆测试。(12)所有年龄组都存在易受暗示的证据,但一年级学生比三年级和五年级学生更容易受到暗示的影响,而三年级和五年级学生又比大学生更容易受到暗示的影响。从本质上讲,与从摘要中记住的相比,参与者声称在视频中实际看到的建议项目的比例也发现了同样的年龄差异模式。(14)朱莉·罗宾逊和帕梅拉·布里格斯还向他们的参与者播放了一部电影,这些参与者有4到5岁的,有8到9岁的,还有成年人。然后他们问了一系列问题,其中一些是误导。一天后,他们问了另一组问题。(17)在误导问题的正确答案方面,最小的孩子比8 - 9岁的孩子和成年人的表现差。然而,后两组没有显著差异。(18)相反,当对误导性问题的建议答案分别进行检查时,研究表明,两个年龄组的儿童都比成年人更容易受暗示,但孩子们之间并没有什么不同。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Children’s Suggestibility Remains a Serious Concern
Amye R. Warren (*) Dorothy F. Marsil (**) I INTRODUCTION After more than two decades of continuous contemporary research on the child as a witness in legal proceedings, a great deal is known about children's eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Excellent reviews of this research are available, (1) and their summaries and conclusions will not be reiterated here. Instead, this article will focus on six areas representing some of the most intractable problems that will require further attention from scientists and practitioners alike. This list of issues is selective and somewhat idiosyncratic, but should serve to illustrate why the current understanding of children's suggestibility is far from complete. Research on each issue will be highlighted, concentrating primarily on studies published or presented in the past ten years. II Six REMAINING ISSUES A. Suggestibility is Not Limited to Preschool Children In the past ten years, research on children's capacities as witnesses has focused heavily on preschoolers, (2) who are disproportionately susceptible to suggestion. (3) The focus on preschoolers was based on both applied and theoretical grounds. For example, investigations in the McMartin Preschool case (4) and State v. Michaels (5) featured particularly problematic interviews with large numbers of very young children in day-care settings. Knowledge of cognitive development principles led child witness researchers to predict that preschoolers' relative cognitive limitations could lead to greater susceptibility to suggestive influences and, in turn, to a variety of problems for their interviewers. For example, Nancy Perry and her colleagues demonstrated that preschoolers have difficulty determining whether they really understand complex questions and frequently inaccurately answer questions that they do not understand. (6) Although the research attention devoted to preschoolers was certainly warranted, it has led to a relative neglect of the equally important population of older children. This trend, however, appears to be changing. In recent studies, researchers are increasingly including older children. (7) The findings indicate that suggestibility generally declines over the school years but that even adolescents can be significantly more suggestible than adults. (8) On the other hand, some studies demonstrate that, under certain conditions, older children and adults can be more suggestible than younger children. (9) The following sections briefly review six studies that included children older than preschoolers. Jennifer Ackil and Maria Zaragoza examined the suggestibility of first graders, third graders, fifth graders, and college students. (10) The subjects viewed a brief video and then heard an experimenter read a summary of the video that included some misleading information. (11) Either immediately afterwards or one week later, participants were given memory tests. (12) Evidence of suggestibility was found for all age groups, but first graders were more susceptible to suggestion than third and fifth graders, who were in turn more susceptible to suggestion than college students. (13) Essentially, the same pattern of age differences was found in the proportion of the suggested items that participants claimed to have actually seen in the video, as opposed to remembering from the summary. (14) Julie Robinson and Pamela Briggs also showed a film to their participants, who were four- to five-year-olds, eight- to nine-year-olds, and adults. (15) They then asked a series of questions, some of which were misleading. (16) A day later, they asked another set of questions. (17) In terms of correct answers to misleading questions, the youngest children's performance was poorer than that of eight- to nine-year-olds and adults. The latter two groups, however, did not significantly differ. (18) In contrast, when suggested answers to misleading questions were examined separately, the study showed that both age groups of children were more suggestible than adults, but that the children did not differ from one another. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law and Contemporary Problems
Law and Contemporary Problems Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Re-Selection on Independent Decision Making in State Supreme Courts Voting Rights and the “Statutory Constitution” Challenging Gender in Single-Sex Spaces: Lessons from a Feminist Softball League Treaties and Human Rights: The Role of Long-Term Trends Correcting Federalism Mistakes in Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court and the Federal Arbitration Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1