{"title":"角蛋白纤维杨氏模量测量方法的比较","authors":"W. S. Simpson","doi":"10.1080/19447026508662325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...","PeriodicalId":17650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"51—A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF YOUNG'S MODULUS FOR KERATIN FIBRES\",\"authors\":\"W. S. Simpson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19447026508662325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...\",\"PeriodicalId\":17650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19447026508662325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Textile Institute Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19447026508662325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
51—A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF MEASUREMENT OF YOUNG'S MODULUS FOR KERATIN FIBRES
Young's modulus has been measured for several types of keratin fibre by a variety of means, including ‘static’ or load–extension methods, an oscillating beam, and an oscillating-fibre cantilever, As a result of these measurements, it is concluded that the Young's modulus for extension of the fibre as obtained from the low-frequency oscillating beam is a little higher than that obtained from ‘static’ measurements and that the difference may be accounted for by contributions from work-hardening effects and by practical differences at very definition of the modulus as well as by the small frequency-dependence at very low frequencies. Young's modulus for bending, on the other hand, cannot be reconciled with simple extension results. High-frequency longitudinal results are also different from the low-frequency values reported here, presumably because, in the high-frequency case, only the very strongest chemical bonds are involved, whereas, for relatively low-frequency measurements, weaker bonds associated with...