H. Kiriyama, Takaaki Kakihiana, Yujiro Maeda, Munemasa Sugimoto, Megumi Machida, Tomotaka Inoue, Fumiaki Ikeno, I. Komuro, M. Ono
{"title":"通过日本的生物设计过程培养设计思维能力","authors":"H. Kiriyama, Takaaki Kakihiana, Yujiro Maeda, Munemasa Sugimoto, Megumi Machida, Tomotaka Inoue, Fumiaki Ikeno, I. Komuro, M. Ono","doi":"10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The biodesign process, which originated at Stanford University, has had a significant impact on medical device invention. Design thinking skills are core elements in the biodesign process, but there has been no quantitative evaluation of how design thinking is actually affected by a biodesign course. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of the biodesign process by quantifying design thinking ability. Methods We recruited 17 participants who had studied a systematic biodesign process in Japan and 20 participants who were unfamiliar with the biodesign process. All participants took the design thinking test and we evaluated their design thinking skills using a combination of the creation score and the evaluation score. Results The average age of the participants was 34.4 years and 84% were male. Participants who had taken the biodesign program generated more ideas than other participants (5.3±1.9 ideas vs 3.7±2.3 ideas; p=0.01). They also had significantly higher design thinking score, especially creation score, than those who had not taken the program (design thinking score, 220.1±39.7 vs 194.6±32.1; p=0.02; creation score, 91.3±23.0 vs 70.7±20.2; p=0.03). Conclusion The findings suggest that the biodesign process can cultivate design thinking skills, especially the ability to visualise needs and create solutions. Exposure of more people to the biodesign process may accelerate innovation in the medical technology field.","PeriodicalId":53454,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Innovations","volume":"31 1","pages":"273 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultivating design thinking skills through the biodesign process in Japan\",\"authors\":\"H. Kiriyama, Takaaki Kakihiana, Yujiro Maeda, Munemasa Sugimoto, Megumi Machida, Tomotaka Inoue, Fumiaki Ikeno, I. Komuro, M. Ono\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The biodesign process, which originated at Stanford University, has had a significant impact on medical device invention. Design thinking skills are core elements in the biodesign process, but there has been no quantitative evaluation of how design thinking is actually affected by a biodesign course. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of the biodesign process by quantifying design thinking ability. Methods We recruited 17 participants who had studied a systematic biodesign process in Japan and 20 participants who were unfamiliar with the biodesign process. All participants took the design thinking test and we evaluated their design thinking skills using a combination of the creation score and the evaluation score. Results The average age of the participants was 34.4 years and 84% were male. Participants who had taken the biodesign program generated more ideas than other participants (5.3±1.9 ideas vs 3.7±2.3 ideas; p=0.01). They also had significantly higher design thinking score, especially creation score, than those who had not taken the program (design thinking score, 220.1±39.7 vs 194.6±32.1; p=0.02; creation score, 91.3±23.0 vs 70.7±20.2; p=0.03). Conclusion The findings suggest that the biodesign process can cultivate design thinking skills, especially the ability to visualise needs and create solutions. Exposure of more people to the biodesign process may accelerate innovation in the medical technology field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"273 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
起源于斯坦福大学的生物设计过程对医疗器械的发明产生了重大影响。设计思维技能是生物设计过程中的核心要素,但目前还没有定量评估生物设计课程对设计思维的实际影响。本研究的目的是通过量化设计思维能力来检验生物设计过程的有用性。方法我们招募了17名在日本研究过系统生物设计过程的参与者和20名不熟悉生物设计过程的参与者。所有的参与者都参加了设计思维测试,我们用创作得分和评估得分的组合来评估他们的设计思维能力。结果参与者平均年龄34.4岁,男性占84%。参加生物设计课程的参与者比其他参与者产生了更多的想法(5.3±1.9 vs 3.7±2.3);p = 0.01)。他们的设计思维得分(220.1±39.7 vs 194.6±32.1)也显著高于未参加课程的学生(设计思维得分:220.1±39.7 vs 194.6±32.1;p = 0.02;创造得分:91.3±23.0 vs 70.7±20.2;p = 0.03)。结论生物设计过程可以培养设计思维能力,尤其是可视化需求和创造解决方案的能力。让更多的人接触到生物设计过程可能会加速医疗技术领域的创新。
Cultivating design thinking skills through the biodesign process in Japan
Background The biodesign process, which originated at Stanford University, has had a significant impact on medical device invention. Design thinking skills are core elements in the biodesign process, but there has been no quantitative evaluation of how design thinking is actually affected by a biodesign course. The purpose of this study was to examine the usefulness of the biodesign process by quantifying design thinking ability. Methods We recruited 17 participants who had studied a systematic biodesign process in Japan and 20 participants who were unfamiliar with the biodesign process. All participants took the design thinking test and we evaluated their design thinking skills using a combination of the creation score and the evaluation score. Results The average age of the participants was 34.4 years and 84% were male. Participants who had taken the biodesign program generated more ideas than other participants (5.3±1.9 ideas vs 3.7±2.3 ideas; p=0.01). They also had significantly higher design thinking score, especially creation score, than those who had not taken the program (design thinking score, 220.1±39.7 vs 194.6±32.1; p=0.02; creation score, 91.3±23.0 vs 70.7±20.2; p=0.03). Conclusion The findings suggest that the biodesign process can cultivate design thinking skills, especially the ability to visualise needs and create solutions. Exposure of more people to the biodesign process may accelerate innovation in the medical technology field.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare is undergoing a revolution and novel medical technologies are being developed to treat patients in better and faster ways. Mobile revolution has put a handheld computer in pockets of billions and we are ushering in an era of mHealth. In developed and developing world alike healthcare costs are a concern and frugal innovations are being promoted for bringing down the costs of healthcare. BMJ Innovations aims to promote innovative research which creates new, cost-effective medical devices, technologies, processes and systems that improve patient care, with particular focus on the needs of patients, physicians, and the health care industry as a whole and act as a platform to catalyse and seed more innovations. Submissions to BMJ Innovations will be considered from all clinical areas of medicine along with business and process innovations that make healthcare accessible and affordable. Submissions from groups of investigators engaged in international collaborations are especially encouraged. The broad areas of innovations that this journal aims to chronicle include but are not limited to: Medical devices, mHealth and wearable health technologies, Assistive technologies, Diagnostics, Health IT, systems and process innovation.