M. Nachi, I. Kihel, D Guella, A. Dali-Ali, A. Abed, Y Boukhatmi, B Enta-Soltane, I Belmir, M. Bekadja, T. Houari, O. Abou
{"title":"伊马替尼治疗慢性髓性白血病患者的性别和主要分子反应","authors":"M. Nachi, I. Kihel, D Guella, A. Dali-Ali, A. Abed, Y Boukhatmi, B Enta-Soltane, I Belmir, M. Bekadja, T. Houari, O. Abou","doi":"10.35248/2167-0501.19.8.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The prognosis for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been significantly improved in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) whose leader is Imatinib mesylate (IM). Obtaining a major molecular response (MMR) is a major objective to achieve. However, the difference in response between the two sexes is often controversial. This work aims to evaluate the molecular response according to sex in Algerian patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP) treated with IM in first intention. Methods: All Novo CML patients benefited from molecular follow-up by quantification of transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). The cumulative incidence of MMR (CIMMR) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison was made using the parametric Log-Rank test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 13.9 including 29 men (53%) and 26 women (47%). For women, the incidence of Mb3a2 transcript was higher than that of Mb2a2 (72% vs. 28%, P=0.12). Men, on the other hand, had an almost equal distribution (52% vs. 48%, P = 0.88). The CIMMR for men was lower than that for women (45% vs. 80%, P=0.018). Conclusion: Women seem to respond more favorably to IM than men.","PeriodicalId":8764,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex and Major Molecular Response to Imatinib Treatment for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia\",\"authors\":\"M. Nachi, I. Kihel, D Guella, A. Dali-Ali, A. Abed, Y Boukhatmi, B Enta-Soltane, I Belmir, M. Bekadja, T. Houari, O. Abou\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0501.19.8.263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The prognosis for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been significantly improved in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) whose leader is Imatinib mesylate (IM). Obtaining a major molecular response (MMR) is a major objective to achieve. However, the difference in response between the two sexes is often controversial. This work aims to evaluate the molecular response according to sex in Algerian patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP) treated with IM in first intention. Methods: All Novo CML patients benefited from molecular follow-up by quantification of transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). The cumulative incidence of MMR (CIMMR) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison was made using the parametric Log-Rank test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 13.9 including 29 men (53%) and 26 women (47%). For women, the incidence of Mb3a2 transcript was higher than that of Mb2a2 (72% vs. 28%, P=0.12). Men, on the other hand, had an almost equal distribution (52% vs. 48%, P = 0.88). The CIMMR for men was lower than that for women (45% vs. 80%, P=0.018). Conclusion: Women seem to respond more favorably to IM than men.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0501.19.8.263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0501.19.8.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:在以甲磺酸伊马替尼(IM)为先导的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)时代,慢性髓性白血病(CML)的预后得到了显著改善。获得主要分子反应(MMR)是一个主要的目标。然而,两性之间的反应差异经常引起争议。这项工作的目的是根据性别评估阿尔及利亚慢性粒细胞白血病(CML- cp)患者的分子反应在第一意图与IM治疗。方法:通过实时定量PCR (RQ-PCR)定量转录本对所有Novo CML患者进行分子随访。用Kaplan-Meier法估计MMR的累积发病率。采用参数Log-Rank检验进行比较。P≤0.05为显著性。结果:55例患者入组,平均年龄45.7±13.9岁,其中男性29例(53%),女性26例(47%)。在女性中,Mb3a2转录本的发生率高于Mb2a2 (72% vs. 28%, P=0.12)。另一方面,男性的分布几乎相等(52%对48%,P = 0.88)。男性的CIMMR低于女性(45% vs. 80%, P=0.018)。结论:女性对即时通讯的反应似乎比男性更积极。
Sex and Major Molecular Response to Imatinib Treatment for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Objective: The prognosis for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been significantly improved in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) whose leader is Imatinib mesylate (IM). Obtaining a major molecular response (MMR) is a major objective to achieve. However, the difference in response between the two sexes is often controversial. This work aims to evaluate the molecular response according to sex in Algerian patients with chronic phase CML (CML-CP) treated with IM in first intention. Methods: All Novo CML patients benefited from molecular follow-up by quantification of transcripts by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). The cumulative incidence of MMR (CIMMR) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison was made using the parametric Log-Rank test. A value of P ≤ 0.05 is considered significant. Results: Fifty-five patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 45.7 ± 13.9 including 29 men (53%) and 26 women (47%). For women, the incidence of Mb3a2 transcript was higher than that of Mb2a2 (72% vs. 28%, P=0.12). Men, on the other hand, had an almost equal distribution (52% vs. 48%, P = 0.88). The CIMMR for men was lower than that for women (45% vs. 80%, P=0.018). Conclusion: Women seem to respond more favorably to IM than men.