来自编辑:介绍来自现场的报告

LeEtta M. Schmidt
{"title":"来自编辑:介绍来自现场的报告","authors":"LeEtta M. Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/1072303X.2014.949396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An obstacle to process improvement is like a river. You can always see the other side: your vision of what your day would be like when you finally get past this obstacle. It is perfectly easy to continue on without crossing the river, and many people are content to do just that. Many stand on the banks and talk about how it would be great if they were on the other side of the river. If only they had the tools and the knowhow, they might figure out a solution. They stand and talk, but they continue working the same way they always have. Then, a few break off from the group gathered on the bank, concentrate on amassing the resources needed, and start building the bridges. After them, everyone follows. Interlibrary loan is an example of this bridge-building phenomenon. It is staffed by tinkerers and innovators who discuss their ideas for improved workflows in the hallways and lunch breaks of conferences. We are competitive and appreciative, taking what we’ve learned back to our libraries and trying to do even better (see Figure 1). A look at the literature, listservs, and conference presentations shows a community focused on constant improvement and problem solving, looking for obstacles to overcome and never completely satisfied. The desired attributes of an interlibrary loan staff, according to interlibrary loan managers, includes enjoying problem solving, loving a fast-paced environment, and adapting well to change (Shrauger, Radnor, & Santiago, 2012). And while some may hang around on the riverbank longer than others, eventually our entire community gravitates to the next big solution, as evidenced by the cresting wave of listserv notifications from libraries who are discontinuing service with Ariel in favor of better options (Deschenes, 2012). We are a group that appreciates innovation and embraces the benefits of our ever changing business. Just this summer there have been multiple reports from bridge-builders. Rapid Returnables (RapidR) promises to combine the request speed and automated processing of RAPID ILL with full loan capabilities. The service release date is July 1 (M. Richins, personal communication, June 4, 2014). This expansion of RAPID services to loan delivery creates the most far-reaching competition to OCLC resource sharing, yet. Working together with OCLC, European libraries have solved the conundrum of abiding by their national copyright laws while transporting","PeriodicalId":35376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Editor: Introducing Reports From the Field\",\"authors\":\"LeEtta M. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1072303X.2014.949396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An obstacle to process improvement is like a river. You can always see the other side: your vision of what your day would be like when you finally get past this obstacle. It is perfectly easy to continue on without crossing the river, and many people are content to do just that. Many stand on the banks and talk about how it would be great if they were on the other side of the river. If only they had the tools and the knowhow, they might figure out a solution. They stand and talk, but they continue working the same way they always have. Then, a few break off from the group gathered on the bank, concentrate on amassing the resources needed, and start building the bridges. After them, everyone follows. Interlibrary loan is an example of this bridge-building phenomenon. It is staffed by tinkerers and innovators who discuss their ideas for improved workflows in the hallways and lunch breaks of conferences. We are competitive and appreciative, taking what we’ve learned back to our libraries and trying to do even better (see Figure 1). A look at the literature, listservs, and conference presentations shows a community focused on constant improvement and problem solving, looking for obstacles to overcome and never completely satisfied. The desired attributes of an interlibrary loan staff, according to interlibrary loan managers, includes enjoying problem solving, loving a fast-paced environment, and adapting well to change (Shrauger, Radnor, & Santiago, 2012). And while some may hang around on the riverbank longer than others, eventually our entire community gravitates to the next big solution, as evidenced by the cresting wave of listserv notifications from libraries who are discontinuing service with Ariel in favor of better options (Deschenes, 2012). We are a group that appreciates innovation and embraces the benefits of our ever changing business. Just this summer there have been multiple reports from bridge-builders. Rapid Returnables (RapidR) promises to combine the request speed and automated processing of RAPID ILL with full loan capabilities. The service release date is July 1 (M. Richins, personal communication, June 4, 2014). This expansion of RAPID services to loan delivery creates the most far-reaching competition to OCLC resource sharing, yet. Working together with OCLC, European libraries have solved the conundrum of abiding by their national copyright laws while transporting\",\"PeriodicalId\":35376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2014.949396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1072303X.2014.949396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

过程改进的障碍就像一条河流。你总是可以看到另一面:当你最终克服了这个障碍时,你的一天会是什么样子。不用过河就可以继续往前走,这是很容易的,而且很多人也很满足于这样做。许多人站在河岸上,谈论着如果他们在河的另一边该有多好。如果他们有工具和专业知识,他们可能会找到解决方案。他们站着说话,但他们一如既往地继续工作。然后,一些人从聚集在岸边的人群中分离出来,集中精力积累所需的资源,并开始建造桥梁。在他们之后,每个人都跟着。馆际互借就是这种架桥现象的一个例子。这里的员工都是一些修补匠和创新者,他们会在走廊和会议的午餐休息时间讨论改进工作流程的想法。我们充满竞争和感激,把我们学到的东西带回我们的图书馆,并试图做得更好(见图1)。看看文献、listservs和会议演讲,就会发现一个专注于不断改进和解决问题的社区,寻找需要克服的障碍,永远不会完全满足。根据馆际互借经理的看法,馆际互借员工的理想属性包括享受解决问题的乐趣,热爱快节奏的环境,并能很好地适应变化(Shrauger, Radnor, & Santiago, 2012)。虽然有些人可能在河岸上停留的时间比其他人长,但最终我们的整个社区都会被下一个大的解决方案所吸引,这一点可以从图书馆的listserv通知中得到证明,这些图书馆正在停止使用Ariel,转而使用更好的选择(Deschenes, 2012)。我们是一个欣赏创新和拥抱不断变化的业务带来的好处的集团。就在今年夏天,就有多起桥梁建设者的报告。Rapid Returnables (RapidR)承诺将Rapid ILL的请求速度和自动化处理与全面贷款能力相结合。服务发布日期为7月1日(m.r ichins,个人通讯,2014年6月4日)。RAPID服务向借阅交付的扩展对OCLC资源共享造成了迄今为止影响最深远的竞争。通过与OCLC的合作,欧洲的图书馆解决了在传输时遵守本国版权法的难题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the Editor: Introducing Reports From the Field
An obstacle to process improvement is like a river. You can always see the other side: your vision of what your day would be like when you finally get past this obstacle. It is perfectly easy to continue on without crossing the river, and many people are content to do just that. Many stand on the banks and talk about how it would be great if they were on the other side of the river. If only they had the tools and the knowhow, they might figure out a solution. They stand and talk, but they continue working the same way they always have. Then, a few break off from the group gathered on the bank, concentrate on amassing the resources needed, and start building the bridges. After them, everyone follows. Interlibrary loan is an example of this bridge-building phenomenon. It is staffed by tinkerers and innovators who discuss their ideas for improved workflows in the hallways and lunch breaks of conferences. We are competitive and appreciative, taking what we’ve learned back to our libraries and trying to do even better (see Figure 1). A look at the literature, listservs, and conference presentations shows a community focused on constant improvement and problem solving, looking for obstacles to overcome and never completely satisfied. The desired attributes of an interlibrary loan staff, according to interlibrary loan managers, includes enjoying problem solving, loving a fast-paced environment, and adapting well to change (Shrauger, Radnor, & Santiago, 2012). And while some may hang around on the riverbank longer than others, eventually our entire community gravitates to the next big solution, as evidenced by the cresting wave of listserv notifications from libraries who are discontinuing service with Ariel in favor of better options (Deschenes, 2012). We are a group that appreciates innovation and embraces the benefits of our ever changing business. Just this summer there have been multiple reports from bridge-builders. Rapid Returnables (RapidR) promises to combine the request speed and automated processing of RAPID ILL with full loan capabilities. The service release date is July 1 (M. Richins, personal communication, June 4, 2014). This expansion of RAPID services to loan delivery creates the most far-reaching competition to OCLC resource sharing, yet. Working together with OCLC, European libraries have solved the conundrum of abiding by their national copyright laws while transporting
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve
Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Electronic Reserve Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The peer reviewed Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve is the only North American journal devoted to interlibrary loan, document delivery, and electronic reserve librarianship. While other journals in reference services and academic librarianship occasionally publish articles on interlibrary loan or electronic reserve, this unique journal publishes over half of all articles on these topics. These important articles are a mix of practice and theory. Retitled from the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply to reflect the expansion of its focus to include electronic reserve, the Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve marks a clear direction to make the journal even more useful to all libraries.
期刊最新文献
Creative Staffing during a Pandemic: Training and Utilizing an on-Campus Student Worker While Working Remotely JILLDDER Special Issue: Sharing Library and Information Resources during a Global Pandemic Introduction from the Guest Editor Course Reserves during the COVID 19 Pandemic: Pivoting Print to Electronic Reserves through a Data Driven Process Report from the Field: Researching Interlibrary Loan/Document Delivery Usage by Health Sciences Libraries during the COVID-19 Pandemic Making a New-Fashioned Resource Sharing Pie under Emergency Conditions: A Georgia Recipe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1