地块大小和植株空间布置对甘蔗家族选择效率的影响

Aparecido De Moraes, Matheus Henrique Silveira Mendes, Mauro Sérgio de Oliveira Leite, Regis De Castro Carvalho, Flávia Maria Avelar Gonçalves
{"title":"地块大小和植株空间布置对甘蔗家族选择效率的影响","authors":"Aparecido De Moraes, Matheus Henrique Silveira Mendes, Mauro Sérgio de Oliveira Leite, Regis De Castro Carvalho, Flávia Maria Avelar Gonçalves","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to identify the ideal sample size representing a family in its potential, to identify superior families and, in parallel, determine in which spatial arrangement they may have a better accuracy in the selection of new varieties of sugarcane. For such purpose, five families of full-sibs were evaluated, each with 360 individuals, in the randomized blocks design, with three replications in three different spacing among plants in the row (50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm) and 150 cm between the rows. To determine the ideal sample size, as well as the better spacing for evaluation, the bootstrap method was adopted. It was observed that 100 cm spacings provided the best average for the stalk numbers, stalk diameter and for estimated weight of stalks in the stool. The spacing of 75 cm between the plants allowed a better power of discrimination among the families for all characters evaluated. At this 75 cm spacing  was also possible to identify superior families with a sample of 30 plants each plot and 3 reps in the trial.\nHighlights\n\nThe bootstrap method was efficient to determine the ideal sample size, as well as the best spacing for evaluation.\nThe 75-cm spacing had the highest power of discrimination among families, indicating that this spacing is the most efficient in evaluating sugarcane families for selection purposes.\nFrom all the results and considering selective accuracy as the guiding parameter for decision making, the highest values obtained considering the number of stalks and weight of stalks in the stools were found at the 75-cm spacing.\n","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of plot size and plant spatial arrangement on the efficiency of family selection in sugarcane\",\"authors\":\"Aparecido De Moraes, Matheus Henrique Silveira Mendes, Mauro Sérgio de Oliveira Leite, Regis De Castro Carvalho, Flávia Maria Avelar Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.48162/rev.39.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to identify the ideal sample size representing a family in its potential, to identify superior families and, in parallel, determine in which spatial arrangement they may have a better accuracy in the selection of new varieties of sugarcane. For such purpose, five families of full-sibs were evaluated, each with 360 individuals, in the randomized blocks design, with three replications in three different spacing among plants in the row (50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm) and 150 cm between the rows. To determine the ideal sample size, as well as the better spacing for evaluation, the bootstrap method was adopted. It was observed that 100 cm spacings provided the best average for the stalk numbers, stalk diameter and for estimated weight of stalks in the stool. The spacing of 75 cm between the plants allowed a better power of discrimination among the families for all characters evaluated. At this 75 cm spacing  was also possible to identify superior families with a sample of 30 plants each plot and 3 reps in the trial.\\nHighlights\\n\\nThe bootstrap method was efficient to determine the ideal sample size, as well as the best spacing for evaluation.\\nThe 75-cm spacing had the highest power of discrimination among families, indicating that this spacing is the most efficient in evaluating sugarcane families for selection purposes.\\nFrom all the results and considering selective accuracy as the guiding parameter for decision making, the highest values obtained considering the number of stalks and weight of stalks in the stools were found at the 75-cm spacing.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定代表一个家族潜力的理想样本量,确定优越的家族,同时确定在甘蔗新品种选择中哪种空间排列可能具有更好的准确性。为此,采用随机区组设计,对5个全兄妹家系进行了评估,每个家系有360个个体,行间(50 cm、75 cm和100 cm)和行间(150 cm)三个不同的植株间距进行了3个重复。为了确定理想样本量以及更好的评估间隔,采用了自举法。结果表明,100 cm间距对秸秆数量、秸秆直径和粪便中秸秆估计重量的平均值最好。植株间距为75 cm时,科间所有性状的鉴别能力较好。在这个75厘米的间距下,也可以用每亩30株的样本和试验中的3个代表来鉴定优良的家族。自举法可以有效地确定理想样本量,以及评估的最佳间距。75 cm间距对甘蔗家族的辨识力最高,表明该间距对甘蔗家族的选择最有效。从所有结果来看,考虑选择精度作为决策的指导参数,考虑粪便中秸秆数量和秸秆重量的最大值出现在75 cm间距处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of plot size and plant spatial arrangement on the efficiency of family selection in sugarcane
The purpose of this study was to identify the ideal sample size representing a family in its potential, to identify superior families and, in parallel, determine in which spatial arrangement they may have a better accuracy in the selection of new varieties of sugarcane. For such purpose, five families of full-sibs were evaluated, each with 360 individuals, in the randomized blocks design, with three replications in three different spacing among plants in the row (50 cm, 75 cm, and 100 cm) and 150 cm between the rows. To determine the ideal sample size, as well as the better spacing for evaluation, the bootstrap method was adopted. It was observed that 100 cm spacings provided the best average for the stalk numbers, stalk diameter and for estimated weight of stalks in the stool. The spacing of 75 cm between the plants allowed a better power of discrimination among the families for all characters evaluated. At this 75 cm spacing  was also possible to identify superior families with a sample of 30 plants each plot and 3 reps in the trial. Highlights The bootstrap method was efficient to determine the ideal sample size, as well as the best spacing for evaluation. The 75-cm spacing had the highest power of discrimination among families, indicating that this spacing is the most efficient in evaluating sugarcane families for selection purposes. From all the results and considering selective accuracy as the guiding parameter for decision making, the highest values obtained considering the number of stalks and weight of stalks in the stools were found at the 75-cm spacing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hazard indicators in urban trees. Case studies on Platanus x hispanica Mill. ex Münchh and Morus alba L. in Mendoza city-Argentina Volunteer soybean (Glycine max) interference in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) crops: ethoxysulfuron and halosulfuron critical level of damage and selectivity Effect of yeast and mycorrhizae inoculation on tomato production under normal and water stress conditions Apple (Malus domestica) and pear (Pyrus communis) yield prediction after tree image analysis Efficacy of zinc lactate and Lactobacillus bulgaricus on nutrition and health of broiler chickens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1