文学、无力与现代性——解读竹内吉美《什么是现代性?》

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Positions-Asia Critique Pub Date : 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1215/10679847-8852124
Qin Wang
{"title":"文学、无力与现代性——解读竹内吉美《什么是现代性?》","authors":"Qin Wang","doi":"10.1215/10679847-8852124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:While the Japanese sinologist Takeuchi Yoshimi is frequently mentioned in discussions of \"alternative modernity\" on the part of Asia, people have not sufficiently addressed the asymmetrical relationship between literature and politics in Takeuchi's thinking, as his literary analysis is oftentimes associated with a Hegelian reading of subjectivity. Through a reading of Takeuchi's \"What Is Modernity?,\" published in 1948, this article examines Takeuchi's discourses on politics from a literary standpoint that is radically nondialectical and \"powerless\" with regard to \"politics\" as he understands it. Takeuchi's critique of modernity as well as his idea of Asian nationalism cannot do without his idiosyncratic understanding of literature, especially his reading of Lu Xun, and his insistence on the powerlessness of literary resistance. Takeuchi's literary reshuffling of the political, the article argues, opens up a horizon where the very historico-political condition of possibility of existing political institutionalizations can be put into reexamination—it helps us reconsider the concepts of relation, otherness, and equality, which are still in operation to frame our understanding of the world.","PeriodicalId":44356,"journal":{"name":"Positions-Asia Critique","volume":"2 1","pages":"399 - 421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature, Powerlessness, and Modernity: A Reading of Takeuchi Yoshimi's \\\"What Is Modernity?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Qin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10679847-8852124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:While the Japanese sinologist Takeuchi Yoshimi is frequently mentioned in discussions of \\\"alternative modernity\\\" on the part of Asia, people have not sufficiently addressed the asymmetrical relationship between literature and politics in Takeuchi's thinking, as his literary analysis is oftentimes associated with a Hegelian reading of subjectivity. Through a reading of Takeuchi's \\\"What Is Modernity?,\\\" published in 1948, this article examines Takeuchi's discourses on politics from a literary standpoint that is radically nondialectical and \\\"powerless\\\" with regard to \\\"politics\\\" as he understands it. Takeuchi's critique of modernity as well as his idea of Asian nationalism cannot do without his idiosyncratic understanding of literature, especially his reading of Lu Xun, and his insistence on the powerlessness of literary resistance. Takeuchi's literary reshuffling of the political, the article argues, opens up a horizon where the very historico-political condition of possibility of existing political institutionalizations can be put into reexamination—it helps us reconsider the concepts of relation, otherness, and equality, which are still in operation to frame our understanding of the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Positions-Asia Critique\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"399 - 421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Positions-Asia Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-8852124\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Positions-Asia Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-8852124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:虽然日本汉学家竹内吉美在亚洲“另类现代性”的讨论中经常被提及,但由于竹内的文学分析常常与黑格尔式的主体性解读联系在一起,人们对其思想中文学与政治的不对称关系的关注并不充分。通过阅读竹内的《现代性是什么?》,发表于1948年,这篇文章从文学的角度考察了竹内对政治的论述,这种观点在他所理解的“政治”方面是完全非辩证的和“无力的”。竹内对现代性的批判以及他的亚洲民族主义思想离不开他对文学的独特理解,尤其是他对鲁迅的阅读,以及他对文学抵抗无力的坚持。文章认为,竹内的文学对政治的重组打开了一个视野,在这个视野中,现有政治制度化的可能性的历史政治条件可以被重新审视——它帮助我们重新思考关系、他者和平等的概念,这些概念仍然在运作,以构建我们对世界的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literature, Powerlessness, and Modernity: A Reading of Takeuchi Yoshimi's "What Is Modernity?"
Abstract:While the Japanese sinologist Takeuchi Yoshimi is frequently mentioned in discussions of "alternative modernity" on the part of Asia, people have not sufficiently addressed the asymmetrical relationship between literature and politics in Takeuchi's thinking, as his literary analysis is oftentimes associated with a Hegelian reading of subjectivity. Through a reading of Takeuchi's "What Is Modernity?," published in 1948, this article examines Takeuchi's discourses on politics from a literary standpoint that is radically nondialectical and "powerless" with regard to "politics" as he understands it. Takeuchi's critique of modernity as well as his idea of Asian nationalism cannot do without his idiosyncratic understanding of literature, especially his reading of Lu Xun, and his insistence on the powerlessness of literary resistance. Takeuchi's literary reshuffling of the political, the article argues, opens up a horizon where the very historico-political condition of possibility of existing political institutionalizations can be put into reexamination—it helps us reconsider the concepts of relation, otherness, and equality, which are still in operation to frame our understanding of the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Positions-Asia Critique
Positions-Asia Critique ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Contributors Contributors Editor's Introduction: Aesthetics of the Uncanny Daizō Sakurai's Trans-Asian Tent Theater, Picun, and the Reenchantment of Urban Space How to Create a New Workers' Culture Together: An Interview with Wang Dezhi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1