营销行为如何影响说服知识:非线性关系的元分析证据

IF 5.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Public Policy & Marketing Pub Date : 2022-01-13 DOI:10.1177/07439156221076166
M. Eisend, Farid Tarrahi
{"title":"营销行为如何影响说服知识:非线性关系的元分析证据","authors":"M. Eisend, Farid Tarrahi","doi":"10.1177/07439156221076166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persuasion knowledge development helps consumers cope with marketplace persuasion, leads to better consumer decision making, and adds to consumer well-being. While significant research exists on the impact that individual factors (e.g., age) and cues (e.g., sponsorship disclosure messages) have on consumers’ persuasion knowledge development, little is known about the influence of marketer actions, such as advertising spending. This is surprising, as marketer activities provide a major source of information for consumers’ persuasion knowledge learning and practice and can theoretically either support or hinder persuasion knowledge development. The authors develop several explanations for various types of relationships between advertising spending and persuasion knowledge. They test these relationships by means of a meta-analysis of the persuasion knowledge literature based on 140 papers with 162 distinct data sets that address persuasion knowledge measurements. They find that increasing advertising spending also increases consumers’ persuasion knowledge. The relationship follows an inverted U-shaped curve; at a certain level of advertising spending, persuasion knowledge begins to decrease. The findings have theoretical and societal implications and, depending on the level of advertising investment, policy implications with the ultimate aim of ensuring consumer well-being and protecting consumer groups with low levels of persuasion knowledge.","PeriodicalId":51437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","volume":"31 1","pages":"107 - 123"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Marketer Actions Influence Persuasion Knowledge: Meta-Analytic Evidence of a Nonlinear Relationship\",\"authors\":\"M. Eisend, Farid Tarrahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07439156221076166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Persuasion knowledge development helps consumers cope with marketplace persuasion, leads to better consumer decision making, and adds to consumer well-being. While significant research exists on the impact that individual factors (e.g., age) and cues (e.g., sponsorship disclosure messages) have on consumers’ persuasion knowledge development, little is known about the influence of marketer actions, such as advertising spending. This is surprising, as marketer activities provide a major source of information for consumers’ persuasion knowledge learning and practice and can theoretically either support or hinder persuasion knowledge development. The authors develop several explanations for various types of relationships between advertising spending and persuasion knowledge. They test these relationships by means of a meta-analysis of the persuasion knowledge literature based on 140 papers with 162 distinct data sets that address persuasion knowledge measurements. They find that increasing advertising spending also increases consumers’ persuasion knowledge. The relationship follows an inverted U-shaped curve; at a certain level of advertising spending, persuasion knowledge begins to decrease. The findings have theoretical and societal implications and, depending on the level of advertising investment, policy implications with the ultimate aim of ensuring consumer well-being and protecting consumer groups with low levels of persuasion knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221076166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156221076166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

说服知识的发展有助于消费者应对市场说服,使消费者做出更好的决策,并增加消费者的幸福感。虽然对个人因素(如年龄)和线索(如赞助披露信息)对消费者说服知识发展的影响进行了大量研究,但对营销人员行为(如广告支出)的影响知之甚少。这是令人惊讶的,因为营销活动为消费者的说服知识学习和实践提供了主要的信息来源,理论上可以支持或阻碍说服知识的发展。作者对广告支出与说服知识之间的各种关系进行了几种解释。他们通过对说服知识文献的荟萃分析来检验这些关系,这些文献基于140篇论文和162个不同的数据集,这些数据集涉及说服知识的测量。他们发现,增加广告支出也会增加消费者的说服知识。关系遵循倒u型曲线;在一定的广告支出水平上,说服知识开始减少。这些发现具有理论和社会意义,并根据广告投资的水平,具有政策意义,最终目的是确保消费者福祉和保护具有低水平说服知识的消费者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Marketer Actions Influence Persuasion Knowledge: Meta-Analytic Evidence of a Nonlinear Relationship
Persuasion knowledge development helps consumers cope with marketplace persuasion, leads to better consumer decision making, and adds to consumer well-being. While significant research exists on the impact that individual factors (e.g., age) and cues (e.g., sponsorship disclosure messages) have on consumers’ persuasion knowledge development, little is known about the influence of marketer actions, such as advertising spending. This is surprising, as marketer activities provide a major source of information for consumers’ persuasion knowledge learning and practice and can theoretically either support or hinder persuasion knowledge development. The authors develop several explanations for various types of relationships between advertising spending and persuasion knowledge. They test these relationships by means of a meta-analysis of the persuasion knowledge literature based on 140 papers with 162 distinct data sets that address persuasion knowledge measurements. They find that increasing advertising spending also increases consumers’ persuasion knowledge. The relationship follows an inverted U-shaped curve; at a certain level of advertising spending, persuasion knowledge begins to decrease. The findings have theoretical and societal implications and, depending on the level of advertising investment, policy implications with the ultimate aim of ensuring consumer well-being and protecting consumer groups with low levels of persuasion knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Policy & Marketing welcomes manuscripts from diverse disciplines to offer a range of perspectives. We encourage submissions from individuals with varied backgrounds, such as marketing, communications, economics, consumer affairs, law, public policy, sociology, psychology, anthropology, or philosophy. The journal prioritizes well-documented, well-reasoned, balanced, and relevant manuscripts, regardless of the author's field of expertise.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Cultivating Sustainable Return Migration to Lebanon: Supporting Young Migrants through Marketing Systems Amidst Ongoing Conflict EXPRESS: Resourcing Hope: Refugee Agentive Consumption Acts in Protracted Displacement EXPRESS: Response Satisficing across Online Data Sources: Effects of Satisficing on Data Quality and Policy-Relevant Results Social Impact at Scale: Reflections on the Recommendations of the TCR Impact Task Force Commentary on “Transitioning to New Paradigms for Societally Impactful Research: Recommendations from the TCR Impact Task Force and an Agenda”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1