评估政府债务展期的成本

J. Kozlowski, Samuel Jordan-Wood
{"title":"评估政府债务展期的成本","authors":"J. Kozlowski, Samuel Jordan-Wood","doi":"10.20955/es.2023.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Committee (FOMC) has raised the federal funds target rate from near zero to around 5%. This has driven up other rates—mortgages, US Treasuries, bank loans, etc. Given the high speed at which rates have risen, there are concerns about the cost of rolling over the existing debt for firms, households, and governments. Specifically, when debt matures, issuers must decide whether to “roll over” their debt—by issuing new debt at the current rate—or find other resources to repay the debt. Take for example a small business owner who, in 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, borrowed at a 3% interest rate with a three-year maturity. This year, when the owner returns to the bank to discuss the rollover of the loan, they will likely be quoted a rate that is double to triple their existing rate. This creates a difficult choice for the business owner: maintain the same amount of debt and pay double or triple in interest or reduce their level of debt and cut costs. This trade-off applies to any debt issuers, e.g., the US government. In the fourth quarter of 2022, the total public debt, according to the US Treasury Department, was just over $31.4 trillion.1 Below, we show a breakdown of this debt: Assessing the Costs of Rolling Over Government Debt","PeriodicalId":11402,"journal":{"name":"Economic Synopses","volume":"121 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Costs of Rolling Over Government Debt\",\"authors\":\"J. Kozlowski, Samuel Jordan-Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.20955/es.2023.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Committee (FOMC) has raised the federal funds target rate from near zero to around 5%. This has driven up other rates—mortgages, US Treasuries, bank loans, etc. Given the high speed at which rates have risen, there are concerns about the cost of rolling over the existing debt for firms, households, and governments. Specifically, when debt matures, issuers must decide whether to “roll over” their debt—by issuing new debt at the current rate—or find other resources to repay the debt. Take for example a small business owner who, in 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, borrowed at a 3% interest rate with a three-year maturity. This year, when the owner returns to the bank to discuss the rollover of the loan, they will likely be quoted a rate that is double to triple their existing rate. This creates a difficult choice for the business owner: maintain the same amount of debt and pay double or triple in interest or reduce their level of debt and cut costs. This trade-off applies to any debt issuers, e.g., the US government. In the fourth quarter of 2022, the total public debt, according to the US Treasury Department, was just over $31.4 trillion.1 Below, we show a breakdown of this debt: Assessing the Costs of Rolling Over Government Debt\",\"PeriodicalId\":11402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Synopses\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Synopses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2023.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Synopses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2023.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)已将联邦基金目标利率从接近于零提高到5%左右。这推高了其他利率——抵押贷款、美国国债、银行贷款等。鉴于利率的高速上升,人们担心企业、家庭和政府对现有债务进行展期的成本。具体来说,当债务到期时,发行者必须决定是否以当前利率发行新债来“展期”债务,或者寻找其他资源来偿还债务。以一位小企业主为例,他在2020年COVID-19危机开始时以3%的利率借款,期限为3年。今年,当房主回到银行讨论贷款展期时,他们可能会得到一个比现有利率高一倍到三倍的利率。这给企业主带来了一个艰难的选择:保持相同的债务数额并支付两倍或三倍的利息,还是减少债务水平并削减成本。这种权衡适用于任何债券发行人,例如美国政府。根据美国财政部的数据,2022年第四季度,公共债务总额刚刚超过31.4万亿美元下面,我们列出了这些债务的细目:评估政府债务展期的成本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Costs of Rolling Over Government Debt
Committee (FOMC) has raised the federal funds target rate from near zero to around 5%. This has driven up other rates—mortgages, US Treasuries, bank loans, etc. Given the high speed at which rates have risen, there are concerns about the cost of rolling over the existing debt for firms, households, and governments. Specifically, when debt matures, issuers must decide whether to “roll over” their debt—by issuing new debt at the current rate—or find other resources to repay the debt. Take for example a small business owner who, in 2020, at the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, borrowed at a 3% interest rate with a three-year maturity. This year, when the owner returns to the bank to discuss the rollover of the loan, they will likely be quoted a rate that is double to triple their existing rate. This creates a difficult choice for the business owner: maintain the same amount of debt and pay double or triple in interest or reduce their level of debt and cut costs. This trade-off applies to any debt issuers, e.g., the US government. In the fourth quarter of 2022, the total public debt, according to the US Treasury Department, was just over $31.4 trillion.1 Below, we show a breakdown of this debt: Assessing the Costs of Rolling Over Government Debt
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Speed and Size of Bank Runs in Historical Comparison How the Death Rate Affects the Aging of the US Population Generational Gaps in Income and Homeownership Professional Forecasters’ Outlook for 2023 and Caveats Based on Past Performance The Rise and Fall of M2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1