{"title":"使用多个模型进行数据融合","authors":"D. Sworder, J. E. Boyd, R. Eliott, R. Hutchins","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple model fusion is useful in applications in which the model of the signal processes is not known with certainty. This paper compares two current fusion algorithms with a novel alternative. The new fusion approach is shown to give improved performance when the observation rate is slow as compared with the important time constants of the signal.","PeriodicalId":10581,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)","volume":"14 1","pages":"1749-1753 vol.2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data fusion using multiple models\",\"authors\":\"D. Sworder, J. E. Boyd, R. Eliott, R. Hutchins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple model fusion is useful in applications in which the model of the signal processes is not known with certainty. This paper compares two current fusion algorithms with a novel alternative. The new fusion approach is shown to give improved performance when the observation rate is slow as compared with the important time constants of the signal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1749-1753 vol.2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of the Thirty-Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.00CH37154)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2000.911288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiple model fusion is useful in applications in which the model of the signal processes is not known with certainty. This paper compares two current fusion algorithms with a novel alternative. The new fusion approach is shown to give improved performance when the observation rate is slow as compared with the important time constants of the signal.