网络上的第三方跟踪:瑞典的视角

Joel Purra, Niklas Carlsson
{"title":"网络上的第三方跟踪:瑞典的视角","authors":"Joel Purra, Niklas Carlsson","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2016.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, third-party tracking services and passive traffic monitoring are extensively used to gather knowledge about users' internet activities and interests. Such tracking has significant privacy implications for the end users. This paper presents an overview of the third-party tracking usage. Using measurements, we highlight the current state of the third-party tracking landscape and differences observed across tracking service classes (e.g., advertising, analytics, and content), across domain categories (e.g., popular vs. less popular, and national vs. global domains), and with regards to the organizations that owns many of the tracker services, when using HTTP and HTTPS, respectively. Understanding these differences help answer questions related to the third-party services that track modern web users and their coverage of our browsing.","PeriodicalId":6864,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","volume":"77 1","pages":"28-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-Party Tracking on the Web: A Swedish Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Joel Purra, Niklas Carlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN.2016.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, third-party tracking services and passive traffic monitoring are extensively used to gather knowledge about users' internet activities and interests. Such tracking has significant privacy implications for the end users. This paper presents an overview of the third-party tracking usage. Using measurements, we highlight the current state of the third-party tracking landscape and differences observed across tracking service classes (e.g., advertising, analytics, and content), across domain categories (e.g., popular vs. less popular, and national vs. global domains), and with regards to the organizations that owns many of the tracker services, when using HTTP and HTTPS, respectively. Understanding these differences help answer questions related to the third-party services that track modern web users and their coverage of our browsing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"28-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

如今,第三方跟踪服务和被动流量监控被广泛用于收集有关用户互联网活动和兴趣的信息。这种跟踪对最终用户的隐私有重大影响。本文概述了第三方跟踪的使用。通过测量,我们强调了第三方跟踪环境的当前状态,以及在跟踪服务类别(例如,广告,分析和内容),跨域类别(例如,流行与不流行,国家与全球域)以及拥有许多跟踪服务的组织中观察到的差异,分别使用HTTP和HTTPS。了解这些差异有助于回答与跟踪现代网络用户及其浏览覆盖范围的第三方服务相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Third-Party Tracking on the Web: A Swedish Perspective
Today, third-party tracking services and passive traffic monitoring are extensively used to gather knowledge about users' internet activities and interests. Such tracking has significant privacy implications for the end users. This paper presents an overview of the third-party tracking usage. Using measurements, we highlight the current state of the third-party tracking landscape and differences observed across tracking service classes (e.g., advertising, analytics, and content), across domain categories (e.g., popular vs. less popular, and national vs. global domains), and with regards to the organizations that owns many of the tracker services, when using HTTP and HTTPS, respectively. Understanding these differences help answer questions related to the third-party services that track modern web users and their coverage of our browsing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the General Chair Message from the general chair Best of Both Worlds: Prioritizing Network Coding without Increased Space Complexity Controlling Network Latency in Mixed Hadoop Clusters: Do We Need Active Queue Management? TransFetch: A Viewing Behavior Driven Video Distribution Framework in Public Transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1