宏观经济力量与套利定价理论

J. French
{"title":"宏观经济力量与套利定价理论","authors":"J. French","doi":"10.1080/15339114.2017.1297245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper tests five macroeconomic variables that have been both theorized to affect stock returns and been proven to do so in past empirical research. Those variables are risk premium, industrial production, term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation. The variables are retested for their statistical significance using four years of monthly contemporary data for six different countries (developed and developing). The United States is used as a benchmark, in addition to the ASEAN-5 (Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia). This study finds that risk premium and industrial production were significant over the sample, but term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation were not significant in explaining domestic market returns. Furthermore, principal component regressions outperformed cross-sectional ones, with factor analysis as the least statistically significant model. For the six countries tested, the arbitrage pricing theory was also found to be a less robust pricing tool than the capital asset pricing model.","PeriodicalId":53585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Asian Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroeconomic Forces and Arbitrage Pricing Theory\",\"authors\":\"J. French\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15339114.2017.1297245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper tests five macroeconomic variables that have been both theorized to affect stock returns and been proven to do so in past empirical research. Those variables are risk premium, industrial production, term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation. The variables are retested for their statistical significance using four years of monthly contemporary data for six different countries (developed and developing). The United States is used as a benchmark, in addition to the ASEAN-5 (Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia). This study finds that risk premium and industrial production were significant over the sample, but term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation were not significant in explaining domestic market returns. Furthermore, principal component regressions outperformed cross-sectional ones, with factor analysis as the least statistically significant model. For the six countries tested, the arbitrage pricing theory was also found to be a less robust pricing tool than the capital asset pricing model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Comparative Asian Development\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Comparative Asian Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2017.1297245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Asian Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2017.1297245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

摘要本文对五个宏观经济变量进行了检验,这五个变量既在理论上影响股票收益,也在过去的实证研究中得到了证明。这些变量是风险溢价、工业生产、期限结构、预期通货膨胀和意外通货膨胀。使用6个不同国家(发达国家和发展中国家)4年的月度当代数据,重新测试这些变量的统计显著性。除了东盟五国(新加坡、泰国、菲律宾、马来西亚和印度尼西亚)之外,美国也被用作基准。研究发现,风险溢价和工业生产对样本有显著影响,但期限结构、预期通胀和意外通胀对国内市场收益的解释不显著。此外,主成分回归优于横截面回归,因子分析是统计上最不显著的模型。对于测试的六个国家,套利定价理论也被发现是一个不如资本资产定价模型强大的定价工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macroeconomic Forces and Arbitrage Pricing Theory
ABSTRACT This paper tests five macroeconomic variables that have been both theorized to affect stock returns and been proven to do so in past empirical research. Those variables are risk premium, industrial production, term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation. The variables are retested for their statistical significance using four years of monthly contemporary data for six different countries (developed and developing). The United States is used as a benchmark, in addition to the ASEAN-5 (Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia). This study finds that risk premium and industrial production were significant over the sample, but term structure, expected inflation, and unexpected inflation were not significant in explaining domestic market returns. Furthermore, principal component regressions outperformed cross-sectional ones, with factor analysis as the least statistically significant model. For the six countries tested, the arbitrage pricing theory was also found to be a less robust pricing tool than the capital asset pricing model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Comparative Asian Development
Journal of Comparative Asian Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Asian Development (JCAD) aims to offer the most up-to-date research, analyses, and findings on the many aspects of social, economic, and political development in contemporary Asia conducted by scholars and experts from Asia and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Muslim Modest Fashion Clothing Theoretical Discussions on China’s Rise in the Era of Globalization Movement Control Order (MCO) - A Viable Legal Mechanism in the Management of COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia? The Relationship of Foreign Direct Investment and Unemployment Rate in the Philippines Factors Driving Foreign Direct Investment: An Empirical Investigation Using Multiple Regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1