某水电站长期使用压力管材料强度

F. Kawamura , M. Miura , R. Ebara , K. Yanase
{"title":"某水电站长期使用压力管材料强度","authors":"F. Kawamura ,&nbsp;M. Miura ,&nbsp;R. Ebara ,&nbsp;K. Yanase","doi":"10.1016/j.csse.2016.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, the material strength of a carbon steel (JIS SS400), which has been used for the penstock of a hydroelectric power plant for about 50 years, is examined. A series of data were obtained and analyzed by measuring the chemical compositions, observing the macro- and micro-structure and conducting tensile tests. The present study revealed that the material strength (0.2% proof strength and ultimate tensile strength) measured at one site can not be regarded as a reliable representative of the entire structure. On the other hand, strong and positive correlation between equivalent carbon content and material strength indicates that measuring the former is an effective and reasonably accurate estimate of the latter. In addition, potential use of nondestructive evaluations, including the Vickers hardness, and their reliability is discussed. In practice, a series of statistical analysis with those valuable field data provides us with the insight on the material strength of long-term used penstock.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100222,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 103-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csse.2016.06.002","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material strength of long-term used penstock of a hydroelectric power plant\",\"authors\":\"F. Kawamura ,&nbsp;M. Miura ,&nbsp;R. Ebara ,&nbsp;K. Yanase\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csse.2016.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, the material strength of a carbon steel (JIS SS400), which has been used for the penstock of a hydroelectric power plant for about 50 years, is examined. A series of data were obtained and analyzed by measuring the chemical compositions, observing the macro- and micro-structure and conducting tensile tests. The present study revealed that the material strength (0.2% proof strength and ultimate tensile strength) measured at one site can not be regarded as a reliable representative of the entire structure. On the other hand, strong and positive correlation between equivalent carbon content and material strength indicates that measuring the former is an effective and reasonably accurate estimate of the latter. In addition, potential use of nondestructive evaluations, including the Vickers hardness, and their reliability is discussed. In practice, a series of statistical analysis with those valuable field data provides us with the insight on the material strength of long-term used penstock.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 103-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csse.2016.06.002\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214399816300169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214399816300169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在这项研究中,碳钢(JIS SS400)的材料强度进行了检查,该碳钢已用于水力发电厂的压力管约50年。通过化学成分的测定、宏观和微观组织的观察以及拉伸试验,获得了一系列数据并进行了分析。本研究表明,在一个地点测量的材料强度(0.2%抗拉强度和极限抗拉强度)不能作为整个结构的可靠代表。另一方面,等效碳含量与材料强度之间存在较强的正相关关系,表明测量等效碳含量是对材料强度的有效且合理准确的估计。此外,还讨论了包括维氏硬度在内的无损评价的潜在用途及其可靠性。在实际应用中,通过对这些有价值的现场数据进行一系列的统计分析,使我们对长期使用的压力管的材料强度有了更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Material strength of long-term used penstock of a hydroelectric power plant

In this study, the material strength of a carbon steel (JIS SS400), which has been used for the penstock of a hydroelectric power plant for about 50 years, is examined. A series of data were obtained and analyzed by measuring the chemical compositions, observing the macro- and micro-structure and conducting tensile tests. The present study revealed that the material strength (0.2% proof strength and ultimate tensile strength) measured at one site can not be regarded as a reliable representative of the entire structure. On the other hand, strong and positive correlation between equivalent carbon content and material strength indicates that measuring the former is an effective and reasonably accurate estimate of the latter. In addition, potential use of nondestructive evaluations, including the Vickers hardness, and their reliability is discussed. In practice, a series of statistical analysis with those valuable field data provides us with the insight on the material strength of long-term used penstock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Seismic vulnerability assessment of an Italian historical masonry dry dock Role of construction materials in the collapse of R/C buildings after Mw 7.8 Pedernales – Ecuador earthquake, April 2016 Editorial Board Fundamental period elongation of a RC building during the Pollino seismic swarm sequence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1