社会企业的众筹

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS Social Enterprise Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1108/sej-05-2022-0051
Wendy D. Chen
{"title":"社会企业的众筹","authors":"Wendy D. Chen","doi":"10.1108/sej-05-2022-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSocial ventures have been reported to have a hard time obtaining funding. A growing number of social ventures have used crowdfunding as a viable alternative fundraising tool. This paper aims to investigate among social ventures, what makes some more successful than others in crowdfunding.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTheoretically, this study builds upon three streams of literature: nonprofit fundraising literature, crowdfunding literature and social entrepreneurship literature. Empirically, it obtains data with a novel Web-crawling approach from the Indiegogo crowdfunding platform and analyzes them with a variety of statistical modeling.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study finds that social ventures that have greater internal resources including team size and venture age, stronger partnerships with other entities and more frequent communications with backers via social media and updates have a higher tendency to successfully raise funds from the crowd than those social ventures that do not.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study seeks to understand social ventures’ crowdfunding performance and identify the specific factors that have led some social ventures to be more successful than other social ventures. It builds a novel data set and uses different statistical models to explore the intersection of social entrepreneurship and digital crowdfunding. In addition, this study provides actionable strategies for social ventures to improve their crowdfunding performance while providing practical implications for increasing people’s knowledge of and participation in social entrepreneurship through education and public policy. Overall, this study contributes to both social entrepreneurship and crowdfunding literature while offering practical implications.\n","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crowdfunding for social ventures\",\"authors\":\"Wendy D. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sej-05-2022-0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nSocial ventures have been reported to have a hard time obtaining funding. A growing number of social ventures have used crowdfunding as a viable alternative fundraising tool. This paper aims to investigate among social ventures, what makes some more successful than others in crowdfunding.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nTheoretically, this study builds upon three streams of literature: nonprofit fundraising literature, crowdfunding literature and social entrepreneurship literature. Empirically, it obtains data with a novel Web-crawling approach from the Indiegogo crowdfunding platform and analyzes them with a variety of statistical modeling.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study finds that social ventures that have greater internal resources including team size and venture age, stronger partnerships with other entities and more frequent communications with backers via social media and updates have a higher tendency to successfully raise funds from the crowd than those social ventures that do not.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study seeks to understand social ventures’ crowdfunding performance and identify the specific factors that have led some social ventures to be more successful than other social ventures. It builds a novel data set and uses different statistical models to explore the intersection of social entrepreneurship and digital crowdfunding. In addition, this study provides actionable strategies for social ventures to improve their crowdfunding performance while providing practical implications for increasing people’s knowledge of and participation in social entrepreneurship through education and public policy. Overall, this study contributes to both social entrepreneurship and crowdfunding literature while offering practical implications.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-05-2022-0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-05-2022-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,社会企业很难获得资金。越来越多的社会企业将众筹作为一种可行的筹资工具。本文旨在调查社会企业中,是什么使得一些企业在众筹中比其他企业更成功。设计/方法/方法理论上,本研究建立在三个文献流的基础上:非营利筹款文献、众筹文献和社会创业文献。在实证方面,本文采用一种新颖的网络爬行方法从Indiegogo众筹平台获取数据,并使用各种统计模型进行分析。这项研究发现,拥有更大内部资源(包括团队规模和创业年龄)、与其他实体有更强的合作关系、通过社交媒体和更新与支持者有更频繁沟通的社会企业,比那些没有这样做的社会企业更有可能从人群中成功筹集资金。原创性/价值本研究旨在了解社会企业的众筹表现,并确定导致一些社会企业比其他社会企业更成功的具体因素。它建立了一个新颖的数据集,并使用不同的统计模型来探索社会创业和数字众筹的交集。此外,本研究为社会企业提供了可操作的策略,以提高其众筹绩效,同时为通过教育和公共政策提高人们对社会创业的认识和参与提供了实际意义。总的来说,本研究对社会创业和众筹文献都有贡献,同时也有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crowdfunding for social ventures
Purpose Social ventures have been reported to have a hard time obtaining funding. A growing number of social ventures have used crowdfunding as a viable alternative fundraising tool. This paper aims to investigate among social ventures, what makes some more successful than others in crowdfunding. Design/methodology/approach Theoretically, this study builds upon three streams of literature: nonprofit fundraising literature, crowdfunding literature and social entrepreneurship literature. Empirically, it obtains data with a novel Web-crawling approach from the Indiegogo crowdfunding platform and analyzes them with a variety of statistical modeling. Findings This study finds that social ventures that have greater internal resources including team size and venture age, stronger partnerships with other entities and more frequent communications with backers via social media and updates have a higher tendency to successfully raise funds from the crowd than those social ventures that do not. Originality/value This study seeks to understand social ventures’ crowdfunding performance and identify the specific factors that have led some social ventures to be more successful than other social ventures. It builds a novel data set and uses different statistical models to explore the intersection of social entrepreneurship and digital crowdfunding. In addition, this study provides actionable strategies for social ventures to improve their crowdfunding performance while providing practical implications for increasing people’s knowledge of and participation in social entrepreneurship through education and public policy. Overall, this study contributes to both social entrepreneurship and crowdfunding literature while offering practical implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Tensions in work integration social enterprises in The Netherlands: balancing social and commercial goals in a multi-stakeholder context Heart and soul: business model innovation by a work-integration organization Roles of entrepreneurship competence in stimulating young generation to become social entrepreneurs in an emerging country Social entrepreneurship and rural development in post-independence Indonesia The dark side of impact measurement: complexities and drawbacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1