伊朗砷的环境发生和健康风险评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Sepideh Nemati-Mansour, K. Hudson-Edwards, A. Mohammadi, M. Asghari jafarabadi, M. Mosaferi
{"title":"伊朗砷的环境发生和健康风险评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sepideh Nemati-Mansour, K. Hudson-Edwards, A. Mohammadi, M. Asghari jafarabadi, M. Mosaferi","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2022.2071207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Arsenic concentrations in different environmental media (water, soil/sediment, food) in Iran from studies performed 2008-2019 were analyzed, and health risk assessment was conducted to depict the arsenic pollution situation at the national scale. Seventy-one studies comprising 5,007 samples were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted concentrations of arsenic in ‘drinking water/water resources’, ‘soil/sediment’ and ‘Iranian rice/imported rice’ subgroups were ‘9.36, 39.2 µg/L’; ‘8.38, 14.9 mg/kg’ and ‘0.06, 0.112 mg/kg’, respectively. The weighted mean value for arsenic concentration in drinking water group was near the World Health Organization (WHO) permissible limit (10 μg/L). Mainly, geogenic sources were introduced as the most common sources of high arsenic manifestation in water resources. Regarding the soil and sediment, the maximum mean concentrations recorded in the vicinity of the mining areas (1700 mg/kg and 161 mg/kg, respectively). The average arsenic exposure from imported rice consumption was approximately 2 times higher than Iranian rice; however, the amount of lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) related to arsenic in both rice types was more than 1.0 × 10-4, indicating that consumers in Iran are at threshold carcinogenic risk of arsenic. The lowest and highest values of LTCR were observed at 9.52 × 10−6 for ‘soil’ and 7.52 × 10−4 for ‘water resources’, respectively. It is concluded that part of the Iranian population in specific regions may carry a relatively high risk, while others have a low risk.","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"71 1","pages":"683 - 710"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental occurrence and health risk assessment of arsenic in Iran: a systematic review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sepideh Nemati-Mansour, K. Hudson-Edwards, A. Mohammadi, M. Asghari jafarabadi, M. Mosaferi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2022.2071207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Arsenic concentrations in different environmental media (water, soil/sediment, food) in Iran from studies performed 2008-2019 were analyzed, and health risk assessment was conducted to depict the arsenic pollution situation at the national scale. Seventy-one studies comprising 5,007 samples were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted concentrations of arsenic in ‘drinking water/water resources’, ‘soil/sediment’ and ‘Iranian rice/imported rice’ subgroups were ‘9.36, 39.2 µg/L’; ‘8.38, 14.9 mg/kg’ and ‘0.06, 0.112 mg/kg’, respectively. The weighted mean value for arsenic concentration in drinking water group was near the World Health Organization (WHO) permissible limit (10 μg/L). Mainly, geogenic sources were introduced as the most common sources of high arsenic manifestation in water resources. Regarding the soil and sediment, the maximum mean concentrations recorded in the vicinity of the mining areas (1700 mg/kg and 161 mg/kg, respectively). The average arsenic exposure from imported rice consumption was approximately 2 times higher than Iranian rice; however, the amount of lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) related to arsenic in both rice types was more than 1.0 × 10-4, indicating that consumers in Iran are at threshold carcinogenic risk of arsenic. The lowest and highest values of LTCR were observed at 9.52 × 10−6 for ‘soil’ and 7.52 × 10−4 for ‘water resources’, respectively. It is concluded that part of the Iranian population in specific regions may carry a relatively high risk, while others have a low risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"683 - 710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2071207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2071207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

对2008-2019年伊朗不同环境介质(水、土壤/沉积物、食物)中的砷浓度进行分析,并进行健康风险评估,以描述全国范围内的砷污染情况。meta分析纳入了71项研究,包括5,007个样本。“饮用水/水资源”、“土壤/沉积物”和“伊朗大米/进口大米”亚组中砷的加权浓度分别为9.36、39.2µg/L;分别为8.38、14.9 mg/kg和0.06、0.112 mg/kg。饮用水组砷浓度加权平均值接近世界卫生组织(WHO)允许限量(10 μg/L)。主要介绍了地源是水资源中最常见的高砷表现形式。在土壤和沉积物中,矿区附近记录的最高平均浓度分别为1700 mg/kg和161 mg/kg。进口大米消费的平均砷暴露量约为伊朗大米的2倍;然而,两种大米中与砷相关的终生癌症风险(LTCR)均超过1.0 × 10-4,表明伊朗消费者处于砷致癌风险阈值。“土壤”和“水资源”的LTCR最低和最高分别为9.52 × 10−6和7.52 × 10−4。结论是,特定地区的部分伊朗人口可能具有相对较高的风险,而其他人则具有较低的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Environmental occurrence and health risk assessment of arsenic in Iran: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
ABSTRACT Arsenic concentrations in different environmental media (water, soil/sediment, food) in Iran from studies performed 2008-2019 were analyzed, and health risk assessment was conducted to depict the arsenic pollution situation at the national scale. Seventy-one studies comprising 5,007 samples were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted concentrations of arsenic in ‘drinking water/water resources’, ‘soil/sediment’ and ‘Iranian rice/imported rice’ subgroups were ‘9.36, 39.2 µg/L’; ‘8.38, 14.9 mg/kg’ and ‘0.06, 0.112 mg/kg’, respectively. The weighted mean value for arsenic concentration in drinking water group was near the World Health Organization (WHO) permissible limit (10 μg/L). Mainly, geogenic sources were introduced as the most common sources of high arsenic manifestation in water resources. Regarding the soil and sediment, the maximum mean concentrations recorded in the vicinity of the mining areas (1700 mg/kg and 161 mg/kg, respectively). The average arsenic exposure from imported rice consumption was approximately 2 times higher than Iranian rice; however, the amount of lifetime cancer risk (LTCR) related to arsenic in both rice types was more than 1.0 × 10-4, indicating that consumers in Iran are at threshold carcinogenic risk of arsenic. The lowest and highest values of LTCR were observed at 9.52 × 10−6 for ‘soil’ and 7.52 × 10−4 for ‘water resources’, respectively. It is concluded that part of the Iranian population in specific regions may carry a relatively high risk, while others have a low risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental implication identification on water quality variation and human health risk assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang River, China Estimation of glyphosate biological half-life among farmers and residents in Thailand Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China Exposure level and risk assessment of atrazine in Chinese adults based on the systematic review data and the Monte Carlo simulation method A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1