重症监护护士经历的道德困境

G. Langley, Leah C Kisorio, S. Schmollgruber
{"title":"重症监护护士经历的道德困境","authors":"G. Langley, Leah C Kisorio, S. Schmollgruber","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2015.V31I2.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Moral distress is experienced when nurses experience conflict while making an ethical decision. This is magnified when the decisions are about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Objective. To explore and describe nurses’ experiences of situations that involve end-of-life care and evoke moral distress in the intensive care units (ICUs) of two public tertiary-level hospitals in South Africa (SA), the personal consequences of these situations and the means employed to manage their distress.  Methods. An exploratory, descriptive design was used. A short survey/interview guide was administered to registered and enrolled nurses ( N =100) employed in the ICUs from two academic-affiliated, specialist public hospitals.  Results. A total of 65 completed surveys were collected. Of these, 32 responses were judged not to be describing moral distress while 33 clearly described moral distress and were included and analysed by means of initial content analysis. The findings were presented in five major categories: ( i ) collegial incompetence or inexperience; ( ii ) resource constraints; ( iii ) end-of-life issues; ( iv ) lack of consultation, communication and negotiation; and ( v ) support.  Conclusion. The study found that nurses experienced considerable moral distress. This is compounded in an environment where gender, professional and social status inhibit the nurses’ assertiveness, ‘voice’ and influence in the healthcare system. Parallels can be drawn between the microcosm of the ICU and the macrocosm of the SA social and ethical character.","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"9 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral distress experienced by intensive care nurses\",\"authors\":\"G. Langley, Leah C Kisorio, S. Schmollgruber\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2015.V31I2.235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Moral distress is experienced when nurses experience conflict while making an ethical decision. This is magnified when the decisions are about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Objective. To explore and describe nurses’ experiences of situations that involve end-of-life care and evoke moral distress in the intensive care units (ICUs) of two public tertiary-level hospitals in South Africa (SA), the personal consequences of these situations and the means employed to manage their distress.  Methods. An exploratory, descriptive design was used. A short survey/interview guide was administered to registered and enrolled nurses ( N =100) employed in the ICUs from two academic-affiliated, specialist public hospitals.  Results. A total of 65 completed surveys were collected. Of these, 32 responses were judged not to be describing moral distress while 33 clearly described moral distress and were included and analysed by means of initial content analysis. The findings were presented in five major categories: ( i ) collegial incompetence or inexperience; ( ii ) resource constraints; ( iii ) end-of-life issues; ( iv ) lack of consultation, communication and negotiation; and ( v ) support.  Conclusion. The study found that nurses experienced considerable moral distress. This is compounded in an environment where gender, professional and social status inhibit the nurses’ assertiveness, ‘voice’ and influence in the healthcare system. Parallels can be drawn between the microcosm of the ICU and the macrocosm of the SA social and ethical character.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"36-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2015.V31I2.235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2015.V31I2.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

背景。当护士在做出道德决定时遇到冲突时,就会经历道德困境。当决定停止或撤销维持生命的治疗时,这种情况会被放大。目标。探索和描述护士在南非(SA)两家公立三级医院重症监护病房(icu)中涉及临终关怀和唤起道德痛苦的情况的经历,这些情况的个人后果以及用于管理其痛苦的手段。方法。采用探索性描述性设计。对两所附属专科公立医院icu的注册和登记护士(N =100)进行了简短的调查/访谈指南。结果。共收集了65份已完成的调查问卷。其中,32个回答被认为没有描述道德困境,而33个回答明确描述了道德困境,并通过初步内容分析被纳入和分析。调查结果分为五个主要类别:(i)大学教员不称职或缺乏经验;(ii)资源限制;(iii)生命终结问题;(四)缺乏协商、沟通和谈判;(v)支持。结论。研究发现,护士经历了相当大的道德困扰。在性别、专业和社会地位抑制护士在医疗保健系统中的自信、“声音”和影响力的环境中,这种情况更加复杂。在ICU的微观世界和SA的社会和伦理品格的宏观世界之间可以得出相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral distress experienced by intensive care nurses
Background. Moral distress is experienced when nurses experience conflict while making an ethical decision. This is magnified when the decisions are about withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Objective. To explore and describe nurses’ experiences of situations that involve end-of-life care and evoke moral distress in the intensive care units (ICUs) of two public tertiary-level hospitals in South Africa (SA), the personal consequences of these situations and the means employed to manage their distress.  Methods. An exploratory, descriptive design was used. A short survey/interview guide was administered to registered and enrolled nurses ( N =100) employed in the ICUs from two academic-affiliated, specialist public hospitals.  Results. A total of 65 completed surveys were collected. Of these, 32 responses were judged not to be describing moral distress while 33 clearly described moral distress and were included and analysed by means of initial content analysis. The findings were presented in five major categories: ( i ) collegial incompetence or inexperience; ( ii ) resource constraints; ( iii ) end-of-life issues; ( iv ) lack of consultation, communication and negotiation; and ( v ) support.  Conclusion. The study found that nurses experienced considerable moral distress. This is compounded in an environment where gender, professional and social status inhibit the nurses’ assertiveness, ‘voice’ and influence in the healthcare system. Parallels can be drawn between the microcosm of the ICU and the macrocosm of the SA social and ethical character.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings. Deep medicine … Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine. The missed art of care? Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1