食管次全切除术后立即食管重建早期口服喂养对患者营养状况的影响:随机单中心研究

N. Kovalerova
{"title":"食管次全切除术后立即食管重建早期口服喂养对患者营养状况的影响:随机单中心研究","authors":"N. Kovalerova","doi":"10.17816/clinutr81628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The efficiency of early oral feeding (EOF) in the postoperative period is well known. Though in the esophagus surgery doctors still prefer another types of nutritional support after esophagectomy (EE) with immediate gastric tube reconstruction. \nAims: to improve the results of patients treatment after EE with gastric tube reconstruction by choosing the method of nutritional support and to evaluate nutritional status of the patients with EOF. \nMaterials and methods: weve conducted prospective single-center randomized study. Subtotal esophagectomy with immediate gastric tube reconstruction was performed to 60 patients. In the postoperative period we evaluated the results of treatment, the frequency and severity of complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory indicators of the nutritional status before the operation, on 1, 3 and 6 postoperative day (POD). \nResults: Patients without high risk of malnutrition were randomly divided in 2 groups: main group (n=30) starting EOF on the 1 POD and control group (n=30) that remained nil by mouth and got parenteral feeding within 4 POD. The patients of EOF group had statistically significant earlier gas discharge (2[2;3] POD vs 4[3;6] POD, р = 0,000042) and stool appearance (3[2;4] POD vs 5[4;7] POD, р = 0,000004). There is a tendency of reduction of the duration of postoperative hospitalization in EOF group (8[7;9] POD vs 9[8;9] POD, р=0,13). EOF does not affect on frequency (46,6% vs 53,3%, р=0,66) and character of postoperative complications. After evaluation of the parameters of nutritional status we found statistically significant decrease of prealbumin level on 3 POD in EOF group (0,17 [0,13;0,21] vs 0,2 [0,16;0,34], р=0,03) of due to inability to compensate daily calorie needs in the first days after the operation. At 6 POD prealbumin became the same in both groups. There were no other significant differences between the groups. \nConclusions: EOF after EE with immediate gastric tube reconstruction is safe and effective. EOF doesnt increase the frequency of anastomotic insufficiency and other complications.","PeriodicalId":92235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical nutrition and metabolism","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of early oral feeding after subtotal esophagectomy with immediate esophageal reconstruction on the patients’ nutritional status: randomized single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"N. Kovalerova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/clinutr81628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The efficiency of early oral feeding (EOF) in the postoperative period is well known. Though in the esophagus surgery doctors still prefer another types of nutritional support after esophagectomy (EE) with immediate gastric tube reconstruction. \\nAims: to improve the results of patients treatment after EE with gastric tube reconstruction by choosing the method of nutritional support and to evaluate nutritional status of the patients with EOF. \\nMaterials and methods: weve conducted prospective single-center randomized study. Subtotal esophagectomy with immediate gastric tube reconstruction was performed to 60 patients. In the postoperative period we evaluated the results of treatment, the frequency and severity of complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory indicators of the nutritional status before the operation, on 1, 3 and 6 postoperative day (POD). \\nResults: Patients without high risk of malnutrition were randomly divided in 2 groups: main group (n=30) starting EOF on the 1 POD and control group (n=30) that remained nil by mouth and got parenteral feeding within 4 POD. The patients of EOF group had statistically significant earlier gas discharge (2[2;3] POD vs 4[3;6] POD, р = 0,000042) and stool appearance (3[2;4] POD vs 5[4;7] POD, р = 0,000004). There is a tendency of reduction of the duration of postoperative hospitalization in EOF group (8[7;9] POD vs 9[8;9] POD, р=0,13). EOF does not affect on frequency (46,6% vs 53,3%, р=0,66) and character of postoperative complications. After evaluation of the parameters of nutritional status we found statistically significant decrease of prealbumin level on 3 POD in EOF group (0,17 [0,13;0,21] vs 0,2 [0,16;0,34], р=0,03) of due to inability to compensate daily calorie needs in the first days after the operation. At 6 POD prealbumin became the same in both groups. There were no other significant differences between the groups. \\nConclusions: EOF after EE with immediate gastric tube reconstruction is safe and effective. EOF doesnt increase the frequency of anastomotic insufficiency and other complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical nutrition and metabolism\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical nutrition and metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/clinutr81628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical nutrition and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/clinutr81628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后早期口服喂养(EOF)的有效性众所周知。虽然在食道手术中,医生仍然倾向于在食管切除术(EE)后立即重建胃管的另一种营养支持。目的:通过选择营养支持的方式,提高肠瘘后胃管重建患者的治疗效果,评价肠瘘患者的营养状况。材料和方法:采用前瞻性单中心随机研究。60例患者行次全食管切除术并立即重建胃管。术后分别于术后1、3、6天(POD)评估治疗效果、并发症发生频率和严重程度,以及术前营养状况的人体测量指标和实验室指标。结果:无营养不良高危患者随机分为两组:主组(n=30)在第1个POD开始EOF治疗,对照组(n=30)在第4个POD内口服EOF治疗。EOF组患者早期排气(2例[2;3]POD vs 4例[3;6]POD, r = 0,000042)和大便外观(3例[2;4]POD vs 5例[4;7]POD, r = 0,000004)均有统计学意义。EOF组术后住院时间有缩短的趋势(8[7;9]POD vs 9[8;9] POD, r =0,13)。EOF对术后并发症的发生率(46.6% vs 53.3%,±0.66)和特征没有影响。在评估营养状况参数后,我们发现EOF组3 POD的前白蛋白水平有统计学意义的下降(0,17[0,13;0,21]对0,2 [0,16;0,34],r =0,03),原因是术后第一天无法补偿每日卡路里需求。在6 POD时,两组的前白蛋白水平相同。两组之间没有其他显著差异。结论:术后EOF术后立即重建胃管是安全有效的。EOF不会增加吻合口不全和其他并发症的发生频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of early oral feeding after subtotal esophagectomy with immediate esophageal reconstruction on the patients’ nutritional status: randomized single-center study.
Background: The efficiency of early oral feeding (EOF) in the postoperative period is well known. Though in the esophagus surgery doctors still prefer another types of nutritional support after esophagectomy (EE) with immediate gastric tube reconstruction. Aims: to improve the results of patients treatment after EE with gastric tube reconstruction by choosing the method of nutritional support and to evaluate nutritional status of the patients with EOF. Materials and methods: weve conducted prospective single-center randomized study. Subtotal esophagectomy with immediate gastric tube reconstruction was performed to 60 patients. In the postoperative period we evaluated the results of treatment, the frequency and severity of complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory indicators of the nutritional status before the operation, on 1, 3 and 6 postoperative day (POD). Results: Patients without high risk of malnutrition were randomly divided in 2 groups: main group (n=30) starting EOF on the 1 POD and control group (n=30) that remained nil by mouth and got parenteral feeding within 4 POD. The patients of EOF group had statistically significant earlier gas discharge (2[2;3] POD vs 4[3;6] POD, р = 0,000042) and stool appearance (3[2;4] POD vs 5[4;7] POD, р = 0,000004). There is a tendency of reduction of the duration of postoperative hospitalization in EOF group (8[7;9] POD vs 9[8;9] POD, р=0,13). EOF does not affect on frequency (46,6% vs 53,3%, р=0,66) and character of postoperative complications. After evaluation of the parameters of nutritional status we found statistically significant decrease of prealbumin level on 3 POD in EOF group (0,17 [0,13;0,21] vs 0,2 [0,16;0,34], р=0,03) of due to inability to compensate daily calorie needs in the first days after the operation. At 6 POD prealbumin became the same in both groups. There were no other significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: EOF after EE with immediate gastric tube reconstruction is safe and effective. EOF doesnt increase the frequency of anastomotic insufficiency and other complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the frequency of consumption of various groups of dairy products by students ANTI-RAGE TARGETS IN CACHEXIA: HMGB1, S100B, S100A1 Nutritional assessment and nutritional status of centenarians Modern aspects of infusion therapy. Nutritional support in the complex therapy of clostridial infection after surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1