验证数据上聚类分析结果的验证:一个系统框架

IF 6.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1002/widm.1444
Theresa Ullmann, C. Hennig, A. Boulesteix
{"title":"验证数据上聚类分析结果的验证:一个系统框架","authors":"Theresa Ullmann, C. Hennig, A. Boulesteix","doi":"10.1002/widm.1444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cluster analysis refers to a wide range of data analytic techniques for class discovery and is popular in many application fields. To assess the quality of a clustering result, different cluster validation procedures have been proposed in the literature. While there is extensive work on classical validation techniques, such as internal and external validation, less attention has been given to validating and replicating a clustering result using a validation dataset. Such a dataset may be part of the original dataset, which is separated before analysis begins, or it could be an independently collected dataset. We present a systematic, structured review of the existing literature about this topic. For this purpose, we outline a formal framework that covers most existing approaches for validating clustering results on validation data. In particular, we review classical validation techniques such as internal and external validation, stability analysis, and visual validation, and show how they can be interpreted in terms of our framework. We define and formalize different types of validation of clustering results on a validation dataset, and give examples of how clustering studies from the applied literature that used a validation dataset can be seen as instances of our framework.","PeriodicalId":48970,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic framework\",\"authors\":\"Theresa Ullmann, C. Hennig, A. Boulesteix\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/widm.1444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cluster analysis refers to a wide range of data analytic techniques for class discovery and is popular in many application fields. To assess the quality of a clustering result, different cluster validation procedures have been proposed in the literature. While there is extensive work on classical validation techniques, such as internal and external validation, less attention has been given to validating and replicating a clustering result using a validation dataset. Such a dataset may be part of the original dataset, which is separated before analysis begins, or it could be an independently collected dataset. We present a systematic, structured review of the existing literature about this topic. For this purpose, we outline a formal framework that covers most existing approaches for validating clustering results on validation data. In particular, we review classical validation techniques such as internal and external validation, stability analysis, and visual validation, and show how they can be interpreted in terms of our framework. We define and formalize different types of validation of clustering results on a validation dataset, and give examples of how clustering studies from the applied literature that used a validation dataset can be seen as instances of our framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1444\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1444","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

聚类分析是一种广泛的用于类发现的数据分析技术,在许多应用领域都很流行。为了评估聚类结果的质量,文献中提出了不同的聚类验证程序。虽然在经典验证技术(如内部和外部验证)上有大量的工作,但使用验证数据集验证和复制聚类结果的关注较少。这样的数据集可能是原始数据集的一部分,在分析开始之前被分离,或者它可以是一个独立收集的数据集。我们提出了一个系统的,结构化的审查现有的文献关于这一主题。为此,我们概述了一个正式的框架,它涵盖了大多数现有的在验证数据上验证聚类结果的方法。特别地,我们回顾了经典的验证技术,如内部和外部验证、稳定性分析和可视化验证,并展示了如何根据我们的框架对它们进行解释。我们在验证数据集上定义和形式化了不同类型的聚类结果验证,并给出了使用验证数据集的应用文献中的聚类研究如何被视为我们框架的实例的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of cluster analysis results on validation data: A systematic framework
Cluster analysis refers to a wide range of data analytic techniques for class discovery and is popular in many application fields. To assess the quality of a clustering result, different cluster validation procedures have been proposed in the literature. While there is extensive work on classical validation techniques, such as internal and external validation, less attention has been given to validating and replicating a clustering result using a validation dataset. Such a dataset may be part of the original dataset, which is separated before analysis begins, or it could be an independently collected dataset. We present a systematic, structured review of the existing literature about this topic. For this purpose, we outline a formal framework that covers most existing approaches for validating clustering results on validation data. In particular, we review classical validation techniques such as internal and external validation, stability analysis, and visual validation, and show how they can be interpreted in terms of our framework. We define and formalize different types of validation of clustering results on a validation dataset, and give examples of how clustering studies from the applied literature that used a validation dataset can be seen as instances of our framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goals of Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (WIREs DMKD) are multifaceted. Firstly, the journal aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of data mining and knowledge discovery by featuring ongoing reviews authored by leading researchers. Secondly, it seeks to highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the field by presenting articles from diverse perspectives, covering various application areas such as technology, business, healthcare, education, government, society, and culture. Thirdly, WIREs DMKD endeavors to keep pace with the rapid advancements in data mining and knowledge discovery through regular content updates. Lastly, the journal strives to promote active engagement in the field by presenting its accomplishments and challenges in an accessible manner to a broad audience. The content of WIREs DMKD is intended to benefit upper-level undergraduate and postgraduate students, teaching and research professors in academic programs, as well as scientists and research managers in industry.
期刊最新文献
Research on mining software repositories to facilitate refactoring Use of artificial intelligence algorithms to predict systemic diseases from retinal images The benefits and dangers of using machine learning to support making legal predictions Sports analytics review: Artificial intelligence applications, emerging technologies, and algorithmic perspective ExplainFix: Explainable spatially fixed deep networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1