幼儿教育中的技术和种族主义框架

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Critical Education Pub Date : 2018-10-15 DOI:10.14288/CE.V9I16.186256
M. Tager
{"title":"幼儿教育中的技术和种族主义框架","authors":"M. Tager","doi":"10.14288/CE.V9I16.186256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing Critical Race theory I analyzed empirical data from a larger study that I conducted in 2014 on deficit discourses in early childhood education. In this auxillary project I unpack how the lack of access to technology directly perpetuates a racist framework in our schools. Technology segregation and it's practices further excludes and marginalizes low-income Black children.  This study examines one school district and the difference in access and attitudes about access that are a part of taken for granted practices relating to technology. Inequities in fundings via PTO's directly affect five low-income Black children observed throughout this study. Their learning trajectories and inability to make progress are tied to this lack of technology. These findings are more than just about inequities in funding for technology they are about a call for action. Interruptions and disturbances in these racist practices need to be addressed throughout this particular school district and in society itself.","PeriodicalId":10808,"journal":{"name":"Critical Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technology and Racist Frameworks in Early Childhood Education\",\"authors\":\"M. Tager\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/CE.V9I16.186256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Utilizing Critical Race theory I analyzed empirical data from a larger study that I conducted in 2014 on deficit discourses in early childhood education. In this auxillary project I unpack how the lack of access to technology directly perpetuates a racist framework in our schools. Technology segregation and it's practices further excludes and marginalizes low-income Black children.  This study examines one school district and the difference in access and attitudes about access that are a part of taken for granted practices relating to technology. Inequities in fundings via PTO's directly affect five low-income Black children observed throughout this study. Their learning trajectories and inability to make progress are tied to this lack of technology. These findings are more than just about inequities in funding for technology they are about a call for action. Interruptions and disturbances in these racist practices need to be addressed throughout this particular school district and in society itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Education\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V9I16.186256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/CE.V9I16.186256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用批判种族理论,我分析了我在2014年进行的一项关于早期儿童教育中的缺陷话语的更大研究中的实证数据。在这个辅助项目中,我揭示了缺乏技术是如何直接延续我们学校的种族主义框架的。技术隔离及其实践进一步排斥和边缘化低收入黑人儿童。本研究考察了一个学区在获取和态度上的差异,这是与技术有关的理所当然的做法的一部分。在本研究中观察到的五个低收入黑人儿童直接受到通过PTO获得的资金不平等的影响。他们的学习轨迹和无法取得进步都与缺乏技术有关。这些发现不仅仅是关于技术资金的不平等,而是关于行动的呼吁。这些种族主义行为的中断和干扰需要在整个特定学区和整个社会中得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technology and Racist Frameworks in Early Childhood Education
Utilizing Critical Race theory I analyzed empirical data from a larger study that I conducted in 2014 on deficit discourses in early childhood education. In this auxillary project I unpack how the lack of access to technology directly perpetuates a racist framework in our schools. Technology segregation and it's practices further excludes and marginalizes low-income Black children.  This study examines one school district and the difference in access and attitudes about access that are a part of taken for granted practices relating to technology. Inequities in fundings via PTO's directly affect five low-income Black children observed throughout this study. Their learning trajectories and inability to make progress are tied to this lack of technology. These findings are more than just about inequities in funding for technology they are about a call for action. Interruptions and disturbances in these racist practices need to be addressed throughout this particular school district and in society itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Education
Critical Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Critique of the Critical Critique of Critical Pedagogy: Freire, Suchodolski and the Materialist Pedagogy of Emancipation How to Get a Life: Humanities Education in the age of Neoliberal Exhaustion Teaching as Intellectual Solidarity Academic Ableism and Students with Intellectual/Development Disabilities: “Disabled or Not, People Just Want to Feel Welcome”: Stories of Belonging from College Students with Intellectual Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1