湄公河流域水电利益分享:谁的利益最重要?

Diana Suhardiman , Dennis Wichelns , Louis Lebel , Sonali Senaratna Sellamuttu
{"title":"湄公河流域水电利益分享:谁的利益最重要?","authors":"Diana Suhardiman ,&nbsp;Dennis Wichelns ,&nbsp;Louis Lebel ,&nbsp;Sonali Senaratna Sellamuttu","doi":"10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Notions of benefit sharing play an increasingly important role in shaping the debate around the merits of existing and future hydropower development in the Mekong region. In this paper we assess how the concept of benefit sharing is articulated and applied in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. We discuss the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of benefit sharing, within the broader context of land and water resources and environmental governance. We argue that while benefit sharing provides an entry point for placing the current debate on hydropower development within the perspective of social justice, better understanding of governance structures and processes is needed. Our primary message is that innovations in policies and programs should not be analyzed in isolation from the wider governance structure, processes, and outcomes. To this end, we are pleased also to introduce this Special Issue of Water Resources and Rural Development, in which several authors analyze current benefit sharing programs in the Mekong region, with a focus on governance, process, and policy implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101278,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Rural Development","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefit sharing in Mekong Region hydropower: Whose benefits count?\",\"authors\":\"Diana Suhardiman ,&nbsp;Dennis Wichelns ,&nbsp;Louis Lebel ,&nbsp;Sonali Senaratna Sellamuttu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Notions of benefit sharing play an increasingly important role in shaping the debate around the merits of existing and future hydropower development in the Mekong region. In this paper we assess how the concept of benefit sharing is articulated and applied in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. We discuss the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of benefit sharing, within the broader context of land and water resources and environmental governance. We argue that while benefit sharing provides an entry point for placing the current debate on hydropower development within the perspective of social justice, better understanding of governance structures and processes is needed. Our primary message is that innovations in policies and programs should not be analyzed in isolation from the wider governance structure, processes, and outcomes. To this end, we are pleased also to introduce this Special Issue of Water Resources and Rural Development, in which several authors analyze current benefit sharing programs in the Mekong region, with a focus on governance, process, and policy implications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources and Rural Development\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2014.10.008\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources and Rural Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221260821400028X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221260821400028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

利益分享的概念在围绕湄公河地区现有和未来水电开发优点的辩论中发挥着越来越重要的作用。在本文中,我们评估了利益分享的概念如何在泰国、柬埔寨、老挝和越南得到阐述和应用。我们在土地、水资源和环境治理的更广泛背景下讨论了利益分享的概念优势和弱点。我们认为,虽然利益分享为将当前关于水电开发的辩论置于社会正义的视角中提供了一个切入点,但需要更好地理解治理结构和流程。我们的主要信息是,不应将政策和项目的创新与更广泛的治理结构、流程和结果分开分析。为此,我们也很高兴地推出本期《水资源与农村发展》特刊,其中几位作者分析了湄公河地区目前的利益分享项目,重点关注治理、流程和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefit sharing in Mekong Region hydropower: Whose benefits count?

Notions of benefit sharing play an increasingly important role in shaping the debate around the merits of existing and future hydropower development in the Mekong region. In this paper we assess how the concept of benefit sharing is articulated and applied in Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam. We discuss the conceptual strengths and weaknesses of benefit sharing, within the broader context of land and water resources and environmental governance. We argue that while benefit sharing provides an entry point for placing the current debate on hydropower development within the perspective of social justice, better understanding of governance structures and processes is needed. Our primary message is that innovations in policies and programs should not be analyzed in isolation from the wider governance structure, processes, and outcomes. To this end, we are pleased also to introduce this Special Issue of Water Resources and Rural Development, in which several authors analyze current benefit sharing programs in the Mekong region, with a focus on governance, process, and policy implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring water security and water demand determinants in rural areas. The case of canton Cotacachi in Ecuador Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh A critical mass analysis of community-based financing of water services in rural Kenya Comparison of informal rainwater harvesting systems to conventional water sources in terms of microbiological water quality The economic contribution of a recreational fishery in a remote rural economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1