G. Kim, Woo-Jin Lee, Byung-Chul Choi, T. Bae, Yoo-Jin Han
{"title":"区域创业生态系统监测指标——以首尔市为例","authors":"G. Kim, Woo-Jin Lee, Byung-Chul Choi, T. Bae, Yoo-Jin Han","doi":"10.22815/jes.2022.3.2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we aim to introduce a methodological approach to develop indicators to monitor a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Based on prior literature survey, we first selected the following six key dimensions - talent, market, finance, support, specialization, and performance. Then, we shifted our attention to deriving 41 indicators that consist of those six dimensions via literature review and focus group interview(FGI). Lastly, among those indicators, we opted for 14 indicators by adopting the Delphi method with 20 experts and subsequently incorporated 8 more indicators if they were considered inevitably essential. As a result, we were able to propose 22 indicators in total. \nThen, by employing the indicators developed above, we tried to measure the regional startup ecosystem of Seoul. As a result, while the numerical values of talent, market, finance, support, and specialization improved in 2020 compared to those in 2019, the numerical value of performance diminished in the same period. These findings indicate that the startup ecosystem of Seoul suffered from inefficiency in the reference time points. Although the indicators proposed have several limitations unless data are consistently collected over time, they can be commonly used when comparing one region with others both domestically and globally. Therefore, various types of comparative studies attracting researchers' attention can be conducted in the future.","PeriodicalId":39110,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicators to Monitor Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case of Seoul City\",\"authors\":\"G. Kim, Woo-Jin Lee, Byung-Chul Choi, T. Bae, Yoo-Jin Han\",\"doi\":\"10.22815/jes.2022.3.2.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we aim to introduce a methodological approach to develop indicators to monitor a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Based on prior literature survey, we first selected the following six key dimensions - talent, market, finance, support, specialization, and performance. Then, we shifted our attention to deriving 41 indicators that consist of those six dimensions via literature review and focus group interview(FGI). Lastly, among those indicators, we opted for 14 indicators by adopting the Delphi method with 20 experts and subsequently incorporated 8 more indicators if they were considered inevitably essential. As a result, we were able to propose 22 indicators in total. \\nThen, by employing the indicators developed above, we tried to measure the regional startup ecosystem of Seoul. As a result, while the numerical values of talent, market, finance, support, and specialization improved in 2020 compared to those in 2019, the numerical value of performance diminished in the same period. These findings indicate that the startup ecosystem of Seoul suffered from inefficiency in the reference time points. Although the indicators proposed have several limitations unless data are consistently collected over time, they can be commonly used when comparing one region with others both domestically and globally. Therefore, various types of comparative studies attracting researchers' attention can be conducted in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22815/jes.2022.3.2.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22815/jes.2022.3.2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indicators to Monitor Regional Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Case of Seoul City
In this study, we aim to introduce a methodological approach to develop indicators to monitor a regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Based on prior literature survey, we first selected the following six key dimensions - talent, market, finance, support, specialization, and performance. Then, we shifted our attention to deriving 41 indicators that consist of those six dimensions via literature review and focus group interview(FGI). Lastly, among those indicators, we opted for 14 indicators by adopting the Delphi method with 20 experts and subsequently incorporated 8 more indicators if they were considered inevitably essential. As a result, we were able to propose 22 indicators in total.
Then, by employing the indicators developed above, we tried to measure the regional startup ecosystem of Seoul. As a result, while the numerical values of talent, market, finance, support, and specialization improved in 2020 compared to those in 2019, the numerical value of performance diminished in the same period. These findings indicate that the startup ecosystem of Seoul suffered from inefficiency in the reference time points. Although the indicators proposed have several limitations unless data are consistently collected over time, they can be commonly used when comparing one region with others both domestically and globally. Therefore, various types of comparative studies attracting researchers' attention can be conducted in the future.
期刊介绍:
AEJ considers theoretical, conceptual and empirical studies in entrepreneurship and small business management for publication.The journal caters to the needs of wide range of readers like B-schools, small and medium business entities, industries, policy makers, researchers, scholars, academicians and students. To this extent the journal encompasses a broad spectrum of topics in this field for publication, including but not limited to Strategy and entrepreneurship, nascent entrepreneurship, global entrepreneurship monitor, female entrepreneurship, business model evolution,Latent entrepreneurship, global entrepreneurship monitor, entrepreneurial spirit, small business owner-manager, small and medium enterprises, industrial policy and sectoral choice, entrepreneurial heuristics, entrepreneurial Spirit, Small business and economic growth, Nascent and start-up entrepreneurs,New venture creation process, organization, and behavior family business, Managerial characteristics and behavior of entrepreneurs,start-up entrepreneurs, customer relationship management, consumer behavior, E-Commerce and E-Business Models.