[二氧化碳吸入作为惊恐障碍挑战试验疗效的荟萃分析]。

Ü. Tural, F. Alioğlu
{"title":"[二氧化碳吸入作为惊恐障碍挑战试验疗效的荟萃分析]。","authors":"Ü. Tural, F. Alioğlu","doi":"10.5080/u23215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether patients with panic disorder (PD) and their healthy first-degree relatives have an increased sensitivity to carbon dioxide inhalation test compared to healthy controls (HC) or patients with psychiatric disorders other than panic disorder. METHOD The databases of PubMed, EMBASE and PsycNET were searched using Boolean operators \"panic AND carbon dioxide\" and \"panic AND CO2\". Selected research articles were classified according to the carbon dioxide concentrations used in testing and the clinical characteristics of the samples. The assumption of heterogeneity across the studies was assessed by chi square based Q and I2 statistics. Publication biases were explored by Begg-Mazumdar's and Egger's tests in addition to funnel graphics. Odds ratios representing effect size of the carbon dioxide inhalation procedure were calculated according to fixed effect and random effect models after obtaining percent weight effects of each study. RESULTS Meta-Analysis was conducted on 33 research studies that include 2114 participants totally. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent panic attacks (PA) compared to HC following in both 5% (OR=14.713, 95% CI 7.532 - 28.739) and 35% carbon dioxide inhalation (OR=11.507, 95% CI 7.775 - 17.031). HC who have a first-degree relative with PD experienced PA approximately 3 times more than HC who have not a first-degree relative with PD (OR=2.658, 95% CI 1.678 - 4.212) following carbon dioxide inhalation test. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent PA than the patients with other psychiatric disorders following the carbon dioxide inhalation test (OR = 3.524, 95% CI 1.945 - 6.384). CONCLUSION There is an increased sensitivity of carbon dioxide inhalation in patients with PD and their healthy first-degree relatives. The role and possible mechanisms of carbon dioxide in etiology and physiopathology of PD should be studied extensively.","PeriodicalId":94262,"journal":{"name":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Inhalation as a Challenge Test in Panic Disorder].\",\"authors\":\"Ü. Tural, F. Alioğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u23215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether patients with panic disorder (PD) and their healthy first-degree relatives have an increased sensitivity to carbon dioxide inhalation test compared to healthy controls (HC) or patients with psychiatric disorders other than panic disorder. METHOD The databases of PubMed, EMBASE and PsycNET were searched using Boolean operators \\\"panic AND carbon dioxide\\\" and \\\"panic AND CO2\\\". Selected research articles were classified according to the carbon dioxide concentrations used in testing and the clinical characteristics of the samples. The assumption of heterogeneity across the studies was assessed by chi square based Q and I2 statistics. Publication biases were explored by Begg-Mazumdar's and Egger's tests in addition to funnel graphics. Odds ratios representing effect size of the carbon dioxide inhalation procedure were calculated according to fixed effect and random effect models after obtaining percent weight effects of each study. RESULTS Meta-Analysis was conducted on 33 research studies that include 2114 participants totally. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent panic attacks (PA) compared to HC following in both 5% (OR=14.713, 95% CI 7.532 - 28.739) and 35% carbon dioxide inhalation (OR=11.507, 95% CI 7.775 - 17.031). HC who have a first-degree relative with PD experienced PA approximately 3 times more than HC who have not a first-degree relative with PD (OR=2.658, 95% CI 1.678 - 4.212) following carbon dioxide inhalation test. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent PA than the patients with other psychiatric disorders following the carbon dioxide inhalation test (OR = 3.524, 95% CI 1.945 - 6.384). CONCLUSION There is an increased sensitivity of carbon dioxide inhalation in patients with PD and their healthy first-degree relatives. The role and possible mechanisms of carbon dioxide in etiology and physiopathology of PD should be studied extensively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u23215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u23215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是对惊恐障碍(PD)患者及其健康一级亲属对二氧化碳吸入试验的敏感性是否比健康对照(HC)或惊恐障碍以外的精神障碍患者更高进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法采用“panic and CO2”和“panic and CO2”布尔运算符对PubMed、EMBASE和PsycNET数据库进行检索。根据测试中使用的二氧化碳浓度和样品的临床特征对选定的研究文章进行分类。通过基于卡方的Q和I2统计来评估研究的异质性假设。除了漏斗图,Begg-Mazumdar和Egger的测试还探讨了发表偏差。在获得每个研究的百分比权重效应后,根据固定效应和随机效应模型计算代表二氧化碳吸入过程效应大小的优势比。结果对33项研究进行meta分析,共纳入2114名受试者。与HC相比,PD患者在5% (OR=14.713, 95% CI 7.532 - 28.739)和35%的二氧化碳吸入(OR=11.507, 95% CI 7.775 - 17.031)中经历了更频繁的恐慌发作(PA)。在二氧化碳吸入试验中,有PD一级亲属的HC发生PA的几率是无PD一级亲属的HC的3倍左右(OR=2.658, 95% CI 1.678 - 4.212)。在二氧化碳吸入试验中,PD患者比其他精神疾病患者更频繁地出现PA (OR = 3.524, 95% CI 1.945 - 6.384)。结论PD患者及其健康一级亲属二氧化碳吸入敏感性增高。二氧化碳在帕金森病的病因和生理病理中的作用和可能的机制有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Carbon Dioxide Inhalation as a Challenge Test in Panic Disorder].
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on whether patients with panic disorder (PD) and their healthy first-degree relatives have an increased sensitivity to carbon dioxide inhalation test compared to healthy controls (HC) or patients with psychiatric disorders other than panic disorder. METHOD The databases of PubMed, EMBASE and PsycNET were searched using Boolean operators "panic AND carbon dioxide" and "panic AND CO2". Selected research articles were classified according to the carbon dioxide concentrations used in testing and the clinical characteristics of the samples. The assumption of heterogeneity across the studies was assessed by chi square based Q and I2 statistics. Publication biases were explored by Begg-Mazumdar's and Egger's tests in addition to funnel graphics. Odds ratios representing effect size of the carbon dioxide inhalation procedure were calculated according to fixed effect and random effect models after obtaining percent weight effects of each study. RESULTS Meta-Analysis was conducted on 33 research studies that include 2114 participants totally. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent panic attacks (PA) compared to HC following in both 5% (OR=14.713, 95% CI 7.532 - 28.739) and 35% carbon dioxide inhalation (OR=11.507, 95% CI 7.775 - 17.031). HC who have a first-degree relative with PD experienced PA approximately 3 times more than HC who have not a first-degree relative with PD (OR=2.658, 95% CI 1.678 - 4.212) following carbon dioxide inhalation test. Participants with PD experienced significantly more frequent PA than the patients with other psychiatric disorders following the carbon dioxide inhalation test (OR = 3.524, 95% CI 1.945 - 6.384). CONCLUSION There is an increased sensitivity of carbon dioxide inhalation in patients with PD and their healthy first-degree relatives. The role and possible mechanisms of carbon dioxide in etiology and physiopathology of PD should be studied extensively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A psychopathological reading of the blood sweat phenomenon and religious stigmas: The case of Blessed Elena Aiello. Association between Symptom Dimensions and Psychosis Risk Factors with Functioning in First Episode Psychosis: A Six Months Prospective Study. Can there be a genetic marker for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder outside the Diagnostic Interview within the Scope of Forensic Psychiatry? COVID-19 AND MANIA: A CASE WITH A ONE-YEAR FOLLOW UP. Hepatitis C Prevalence, HCV awareness and Certain Psychological Factors in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1