口服咪达唑仑与异丙嗪作为小儿牙科的预镇静药物

G. Ansari, S. Razavi, L. Toomarian, A. Eghbali, S. Shayeghi
{"title":"口服咪达唑仑与异丙嗪作为小儿牙科的预镇静药物","authors":"G. Ansari, S. Razavi, L. Toomarian, A. Eghbali, S. Shayeghi","doi":"10.22037/JDS.V36I2.24547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Pre- and post-sedation effect of oral Midazolam to promethazine in2-6 yrs old fearful children for dental treatment Methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out on a group of 26 children aged 2-6 years referred to the dental school due to their fear and multiple dental needs. Patients were selected from ASA I or II classification and scored 1 in Frankl Behavior scale. Each patient was scheduled for two subsequent visits to receive one of the two pre medications before IV sedation. Each patient served as self-control and randomly assigned to either group A: receiving Midazolam oral as premed in 1 st visit or group B: receiving Promethazine oral as the premed in 1 st visit. Six hour NPO was instructed prior to sedation visit. Monitoring vital signs were conducted at every 15 minutes starting with base line before any drug administration. Sedation score was recorded using Houpt Sedation scale. Post sedation problems were recorded by operator. Data were analyzed using Student t test and Kruskal Wallis. Results No significant difference was noted between the patient perceptions at the two different visits. Children did not show a significant difference on symptoms such as Crying, Movement, Sleep and overall behavior in two visits at the first 15 minutes of sedative injection. Post-operative complications were having no significant difference. Lower sickness and vomiting were reported following promethazine intake. Conclusion Promethazine seems to be as effective and as acceptable premedication as Midazolam in pediatric dentistry.","PeriodicalId":21563,"journal":{"name":"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":"47-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Midazolam Vs Promethazine as Pre Sedation Medication in Pediatric Dentistry\",\"authors\":\"G. Ansari, S. Razavi, L. Toomarian, A. Eghbali, S. Shayeghi\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/JDS.V36I2.24547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Pre- and post-sedation effect of oral Midazolam to promethazine in2-6 yrs old fearful children for dental treatment Methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out on a group of 26 children aged 2-6 years referred to the dental school due to their fear and multiple dental needs. Patients were selected from ASA I or II classification and scored 1 in Frankl Behavior scale. Each patient was scheduled for two subsequent visits to receive one of the two pre medications before IV sedation. Each patient served as self-control and randomly assigned to either group A: receiving Midazolam oral as premed in 1 st visit or group B: receiving Promethazine oral as the premed in 1 st visit. Six hour NPO was instructed prior to sedation visit. Monitoring vital signs were conducted at every 15 minutes starting with base line before any drug administration. Sedation score was recorded using Houpt Sedation scale. Post sedation problems were recorded by operator. Data were analyzed using Student t test and Kruskal Wallis. Results No significant difference was noted between the patient perceptions at the two different visits. Children did not show a significant difference on symptoms such as Crying, Movement, Sleep and overall behavior in two visits at the first 15 minutes of sedative injection. Post-operative complications were having no significant difference. Lower sickness and vomiting were reported following promethazine intake. Conclusion Promethazine seems to be as effective and as acceptable premedication as Midazolam in pediatric dentistry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"47-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/JDS.V36I2.24547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/JDS.V36I2.24547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的观察口服咪达唑仑对异丙嗪在2 ~ 6岁恐惧儿童牙科治疗中的镇静前后效果。方法选取26例2 ~ 6岁因恐惧和多种牙科需求而转至牙科学校的儿童进行随机临床试验。患者分为ASA I或II级,Frankl行为量表得分为1分。每位患者在静脉镇静前安排两次后续访问,接受两种预用药中的一种。每个患者进行自我控制,随机分为A组:第一次就诊时口服咪达唑仑作为预用药,B组:第一次就诊时口服异丙嗪作为预用药。镇静访视前6小时NPO。在给药前从基线开始每15分钟监测一次生命体征。采用Houpt镇静评分法记录镇静评分。操作者记录镇静后的问题。数据分析采用Student t检验和Kruskal Wallis。结果两种访视方式的患者感知无显著差异。儿童在注射镇静剂前15分钟的两次就诊中,在哭泣、运动、睡眠和整体行为等症状上没有表现出显著差异。术后并发症无明显差异。服用异丙嗪后,疾病和呕吐减少。结论异丙嗪与咪达唑仑在儿童牙科治疗中是同样有效和可接受的前用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oral Midazolam Vs Promethazine as Pre Sedation Medication in Pediatric Dentistry
Objectives Pre- and post-sedation effect of oral Midazolam to promethazine in2-6 yrs old fearful children for dental treatment Methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out on a group of 26 children aged 2-6 years referred to the dental school due to their fear and multiple dental needs. Patients were selected from ASA I or II classification and scored 1 in Frankl Behavior scale. Each patient was scheduled for two subsequent visits to receive one of the two pre medications before IV sedation. Each patient served as self-control and randomly assigned to either group A: receiving Midazolam oral as premed in 1 st visit or group B: receiving Promethazine oral as the premed in 1 st visit. Six hour NPO was instructed prior to sedation visit. Monitoring vital signs were conducted at every 15 minutes starting with base line before any drug administration. Sedation score was recorded using Houpt Sedation scale. Post sedation problems were recorded by operator. Data were analyzed using Student t test and Kruskal Wallis. Results No significant difference was noted between the patient perceptions at the two different visits. Children did not show a significant difference on symptoms such as Crying, Movement, Sleep and overall behavior in two visits at the first 15 minutes of sedative injection. Post-operative complications were having no significant difference. Lower sickness and vomiting were reported following promethazine intake. Conclusion Promethazine seems to be as effective and as acceptable premedication as Midazolam in pediatric dentistry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Propolis on Discoloration of Teeth Orthodontic Management of a Severely Rotated Maxillary Central Incisor with a Modified Whip Appliance in Mixed Dentition Period D-1 Gene Polymorphism in Salivary Gland Tumors Dimensional Accuracy of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials Considering Impression Techniques– A Literature Review Comparison of salivary level of leptin in chronic periodontitis patients and healthy controls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1