时间是至关重要的:对信息系统开发研究中时间性的系统文献综述

Mairead O'Connor, K. Conboy, Denis Dennehy
{"title":"时间是至关重要的:对信息系统开发研究中时间性的系统文献综述","authors":"Mairead O'Connor, K. Conboy, Denis Dennehy","doi":"10.1108/itp-11-2019-0597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify, classify and analyse temporality in information systems development (ISD) literature.Design/methodology/approachThe authors address the temporality and ISD research gap by using a framework – which classifies time into three categories: conceptions of time, mapping activities to time and actors relating to time. The authors conduct a systematic literature review which investigates time in ISD within the Senior Scholars' Basket, Information Technology & People (IT&P), and top two information systems conferences over the past 20 years. The search strategy resulted in 9,850 studies of which 47 were identified as primary papers.FindingsThe results reveal that ISD research is ill equipped for contemporary thinking around time. This systematic literature review (SLR) contributes to ISD by finding the following gaps in the literature: (1) clock time is dominant and all other types of time are under-researched; (2) contributions to mapping activities to time is lacking and existing studies focus on single ISD projects rather multiple complex ISD projects; (3) research on actors relating to time is lacking; (4) existing ISD studies which contribute to temporal characteristics are fragmented and lack integration with other categories of time and (5) ISD methodology papers lack contributions to temporal characteristics and fail to acknowledge and contribute to time as a multifaceted interrelated concept.Originality/valueThis work has developed the first SLR on temporality in ISD. This study provides a starting point for ISD researchers and ISD practitioners to test commonly held temporal assumptions of ISD researchers and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":13533,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Technol. People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time is of the essence: a systematic literature review of temporality in information systems development research\",\"authors\":\"Mairead O'Connor, K. Conboy, Denis Dennehy\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/itp-11-2019-0597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify, classify and analyse temporality in information systems development (ISD) literature.Design/methodology/approachThe authors address the temporality and ISD research gap by using a framework – which classifies time into three categories: conceptions of time, mapping activities to time and actors relating to time. The authors conduct a systematic literature review which investigates time in ISD within the Senior Scholars' Basket, Information Technology & People (IT&P), and top two information systems conferences over the past 20 years. The search strategy resulted in 9,850 studies of which 47 were identified as primary papers.FindingsThe results reveal that ISD research is ill equipped for contemporary thinking around time. This systematic literature review (SLR) contributes to ISD by finding the following gaps in the literature: (1) clock time is dominant and all other types of time are under-researched; (2) contributions to mapping activities to time is lacking and existing studies focus on single ISD projects rather multiple complex ISD projects; (3) research on actors relating to time is lacking; (4) existing ISD studies which contribute to temporal characteristics are fragmented and lack integration with other categories of time and (5) ISD methodology papers lack contributions to temporal characteristics and fail to acknowledge and contribute to time as a multifaceted interrelated concept.Originality/valueThis work has developed the first SLR on temporality in ISD. This study provides a starting point for ISD researchers and ISD practitioners to test commonly held temporal assumptions of ISD researchers and practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Technol. People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Technol. People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-11-2019-0597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Technol. People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-11-2019-0597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文的目的是识别、分类和分析信息系统开发(ISD)文献中的时间性。设计/方法/方法作者通过使用一个框架来解决时间性和ISD研究差距,该框架将时间分为三类:时间概念、映射活动到时间和与时间相关的行为者。作者进行了系统的文献综述,调查了过去20年来高级学者篮子、信息技术与人(IT&P)和前两个信息系统会议中ISD的时间。搜索策略产生了9,850篇研究,其中47篇被确定为主要论文。研究结果表明,ISD研究并没有为当代思维做好准备。本系统性文献综述(SLR)通过发现文献中的以下空白对ISD做出了贡献:(1)时钟时间占主导地位,所有其他类型的时间都未得到充分研究;(2)缺乏对时间映射活动的贡献,现有研究侧重于单个ISD项目,而不是多个复杂的ISD项目;(3)与时间相关的行为人研究缺失;(4)现有的ISD研究对时间特征的贡献是碎片化的,缺乏与其他时间类别的整合;(5)ISD方法论文缺乏对时间特征的贡献,未能承认和贡献时间是一个多方面的相互关联的概念。独创性/价值本作品开发了ISD中第一个关于时间性的单反。本研究为ISD研究人员和ISD从业人员提供了一个起点,以检验ISD研究人员和从业人员普遍持有的时间假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time is of the essence: a systematic literature review of temporality in information systems development research
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify, classify and analyse temporality in information systems development (ISD) literature.Design/methodology/approachThe authors address the temporality and ISD research gap by using a framework – which classifies time into three categories: conceptions of time, mapping activities to time and actors relating to time. The authors conduct a systematic literature review which investigates time in ISD within the Senior Scholars' Basket, Information Technology & People (IT&P), and top two information systems conferences over the past 20 years. The search strategy resulted in 9,850 studies of which 47 were identified as primary papers.FindingsThe results reveal that ISD research is ill equipped for contemporary thinking around time. This systematic literature review (SLR) contributes to ISD by finding the following gaps in the literature: (1) clock time is dominant and all other types of time are under-researched; (2) contributions to mapping activities to time is lacking and existing studies focus on single ISD projects rather multiple complex ISD projects; (3) research on actors relating to time is lacking; (4) existing ISD studies which contribute to temporal characteristics are fragmented and lack integration with other categories of time and (5) ISD methodology papers lack contributions to temporal characteristics and fail to acknowledge and contribute to time as a multifaceted interrelated concept.Originality/valueThis work has developed the first SLR on temporality in ISD. This study provides a starting point for ISD researchers and ISD practitioners to test commonly held temporal assumptions of ISD researchers and practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest editorial: Work from home (WFH), employee productivity and wellbeing: lessons from COVID-19 and future implications Exploring the impact of digital work on work-life balance and job performance: a technology affordance perspective Exploring the effects of different achievement goals on contributor participation in crowdsourcing Supporting participatory innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of enterprise social media use Understanding customer's meaningful engagement with AI-powered service robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1